Forum |  HardWare.fr | News | Articles | PC | S'identifier | S'inscrire | Shop Recherche
2504 connectés 

 

 

La guerre est finie. Content du résultat ?


 
7.0 %
 67 votes
1.  c'est parfait, on pouvait pas réver mieux
 
 
12.9 %
 124 votes
2.  on sait très bien que c'est difficile, mais le bon chemin a été pris
 
 
25.7 %
 247 votes
3.  y-avait des solutions, malheureusement on obtient rien par la violence
 
 
36.3 %
 349 votes
4.  on peut pas laisser continuer les choses ainsi, les usa sont devenus trop dangereux
 
 
18.1 %
 174 votes
5.  toutes ces histoires ne sont là que pour échauffer les esprits et donner ainsi de l'énergie à la Matrice !
 

Total : 1080 votes (119 votes blancs)
Ce sondage est clos, vous ne pouvez plus voter
 Mot :   Pseudo :  
  Aller à la page :
 
 Page :   1  2  3  4  5  ..  285  286  287  ..  296  297  298  299  300  301
Auteur Sujet :

[Topic - Irak ] Qui sauvera l'Irak des mains des Néo-Conservateurs ?

n°5089268
korrigan73
Membré
Posté le 17-03-2005 à 20:14:42  profilanswer
 

Reprise du message précédent :

abakuk a écrit :

Les atermoiements de Silvio Berlusconi et les menaces américaines sont inquiétants : un état souverain n'a-t-il pas le droit de décider de manière unilatérale de sa participation à un conflit armé?


en theorie si.
mais si le berlusconi a choisit d'envoyer des troupes c'est parce qu'il avait qq chose a y gagner a la sortie, genre contrats pour la reconstruction du pays ou truc du style.
et la on a clairement du lui faire comprendre que s'il se cassait de une il n'aurai plus ces contrats, et de deux ca refroidirai les relations internationales entre ces pays.
et le rital s'est executé, c'est toute la difference entre un atlantiste et un etat totalement souverain...


---------------
El predicator du topic foot
mood
Publicité
Posté le 17-03-2005 à 20:14:42  profilanswer
 

n°5089317
machinbidu​le1974
Do you feel lucky, punk ?
Posté le 17-03-2005 à 20:21:21  profilanswer
 

vrossi1 a écrit :

[quote]Comment les Etats-Unis délocalisent la torture
 
...
 
 
je suis sur que certains ici seront capable de défendre ces pratiques indignes du pays dont le président se dit représenter le monde "civilisé" (sic)


 
Mais quelles bandes de pourritures... J'ai lâche le sujet de la guerre en Irak mais ça m'énerve trop de lire ça, rien que de voir W 10 secondes à la télé, c'est trop...

n°5089729
Don Quidoc​te
Tu n'as rien à dire.Tais-toi !
Posté le 17-03-2005 à 21:09:08  profilanswer
 

Finalement, la loge P2 a prévalu. Mais pour combien de temps?

n°5090073
timn-ber
Tomn-Hanks
Posté le 17-03-2005 à 22:13:05  profilanswer
 

Ah ben c'est ça.
 :lol:

n°5091481
Profil sup​primé
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 01:18:09  answer
 

le cas du canadien avait deja été traité par certain journaliste, mais ca n'avait l'air d'émouvoir personne. J'ai lu aussi il y'a quelques temps, un article sur des troupes américaine soupconné de crime de guerre, des soldats avait fait transporté des prisonniers dans des camions citernes fermé, puis vu qu'il y'avais un risque non negligeable que les survivants au boute de quelques heures de voyages meurs d'asphyxie ils ont tiré a travers le camion pour faire des trous les prisonniers dedans evidemment. L'article provenait d'un journal serieux de memoire mais comme ca date de la guerre d'afghanistan pour retrouvé ca :/

n°5091713
Salladin
Maître de Guerre /Jihad Master
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 02:24:06  profilanswer
 


c passé au vrai journal de karl zero sur c+
des centaines de prisonniers sont morts durant le transport  
enfermés dans un container sans eau sans bouffe sans aération
et tracté sur 800 km de désert
ça m'a rappellé les wagons a bestiaux du IIIème Reich
comme quoi les idées ne se perdent jamais, elles se recyclent


---------------
Ne croyez pas batir sur nos dépouilles votre Nouveau Monde . ( Kateb Yacine )
n°5091725
Salladin
Maître de Guerre /Jihad Master
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 02:36:13  profilanswer
 

Don Quidocte a écrit :

Finalement, la loge P2 a prévalu. Mais pour combien de temps?


peux-tu donner plus de détails ?
merci


---------------
Ne croyez pas batir sur nos dépouilles votre Nouveau Monde . ( Kateb Yacine )
n°5091734
Don Quidoc​te
Tu n'as rien à dire.Tais-toi !
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 02:42:57  profilanswer
 

Salladin a écrit :

peux-tu donner plus de détails ?
merci


 
http://www.google.com/search?hl=fr [...] ercher&lr=
 
Piacere!

n°5092843
Kiriou
Vicious...
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 10:35:49  profilanswer
 

Citation :

Les autopsies réalisées par des médecins et citées dans les rapports indiquent que les jambes de Dilawar étaient tellement abîmées que des amputations auraient été nécessaires. Dilawar est mort de "traumatismes violents aux extrémités inférieures provoquant des complications coronaires et artérielles", selon un document en date du 6 juillet 2004.  
 
Le mollah Habibullah est décédé d'une embolie pulmonaire liée apparemment à la présence de caillots formés dans ses jambes à la suite des coups reçus, selon un rapport du 1er juin 2004.


 
 
Quelle bande de pourriture !  :ouch:


---------------
Si tout fonctionne correctement, c'est que vous n'avez manifestement pas remarqué quelque chose.
n°5093044
kokolekoko
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 11:04:40  profilanswer
 

machinbidule1974 a écrit :

Mais quelles bandes de pourritures... J'ai lâche le sujet de la guerre en Irak mais ça m'énerve trop de lire ça, rien que de voir W 10 secondes à la télé, c'est trop...


effectivement quelle bande de pourritures ces tortionnaires egyptiens, marocains, syriens et jordaniens


Message édité par kokolekoko le 18-03-2005 à 11:04:54
mood
Publicité
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 11:04:40  profilanswer
 

n°5093048
scOulOu
Born Under Saturn
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 11:06:23  profilanswer
 

kokolekoko a écrit :

effectivement quelle bande de pourritures ces tortionnaires egyptiens, marocains, syriens et jordaniens


Oui bien sûr, il est connu que les petits exécutants sont plus à blâmer que les commanditaires [:itm]

n°5093090
kokolekoko
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 11:12:39  profilanswer
 

scOulOu a écrit :

Oui bien sûr, il est connu que les petits exécutants sont plus à blâmer que les commanditaires [:itm]


[:rofl]
j'avais eu envie de poster bien pire, mais je vois que ça a été suffisant.
 
sinon, oué, eux n'avaient eux ni haine "légitimable" ni croyance en un interet informatif direct, mais ils ont torturé quand même, pour plaire et faire les lèche culs. bah oui, pour moi c'est pire [:itm]
 
plus l'oppresseur est vil, plus l'esclave est infâme.


Message édité par kokolekoko le 18-03-2005 à 11:12:57
n°5093142
scOulOu
Born Under Saturn
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 11:18:30  profilanswer
 

kokolekoko a écrit :

sinon, oué, eux n'avaient eux ni haine "légitimable" ni croyance en un interet informatif direct, mais ils ont torturé quand même, pour plaire et faire les lèche culs. bah oui, pour moi c'est pire


Que répondre à qqch d'aussi con ? [:mlc2]
 
Le tueur à gages est pire que le parrain de la Mafia, aussi ? Le militaire est pire que le général qui ordonne de raser la ville ? Le terroriste est pire que son grand chef (BL, Zarkaoui, etc) ?

n°5093282
vrossi1
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 11:46:15  profilanswer
 

kokolekoko a écrit :

[:rofl]
sinon, oué, eux n'avaient eux ni haine "légitimable" ni croyance en un interet informatif direct, mais ils ont torturé quand même, pour plaire et faire les lèche culs. bah oui, pour moi c'est pire [:itm]


 
 
non mais ils peuvent avoir des avantages économiques et politiques avec les usa.
 
de plus aux dernières nouvelles les pays sus cités n'ont JAMAIS déclaré représenter le monde "libre/civilisé/démocratique" au contraire du commanditaire

n°5093754
Salladin
Maître de Guerre /Jihad Master
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 12:45:42  profilanswer
 

ici commence la démocratie
vous n'avez pas le croit de garder le silence
vous n'avez pas le droit à un avocat
toute résistance est inutile
nous avons les moyens de vous faire parler


---------------
Ne croyez pas batir sur nos dépouilles votre Nouveau Monde . ( Kateb Yacine )
n°5096847
machinbidu​le1974
Do you feel lucky, punk ?
Posté le 18-03-2005 à 19:31:50  profilanswer
 

kokolekoko a écrit :

effectivement quelle bande de pourritures ces tortionnaires egyptiens, marocains, syriens et jordaniens


 
No comment...  :pfff:

n°5099487
abakuk
Posté le 19-03-2005 à 08:10:55  profilanswer
 

C'est pas pour me vanter, mais la qualité moyenne du topic est très très basse ces jours-ci. Ceci rien qu'à cause d'un ou deux boulets...
 
Au fait kokolekoko, j'attend toujours une explication de texte pour ton "Et alors?" de l'autre jour. D'avance :jap:.


---------------
Islamophobie | Rapport Obin | Test de pureté
n°5099529
blackmanth​a
Fuck Boeing
Posté le 19-03-2005 à 08:34:25  profilanswer
 

oui tres moyen


---------------
Je me souviens
n°5112779
el muchach​o
Comfortably Numb
Posté le 21-03-2005 à 00:38:41  profilanswer
 

POur revenir au titre du sujet, Wolfowitz à la tête de la Banque Mondiale, ça vout fait quoi ?
 
Moi, ça me ferait vraiment mal au cul.

n°5112825
Salladin
Maître de Guerre /Jihad Master
Posté le 21-03-2005 à 00:47:17  profilanswer
 

el muchacho a écrit :

POur revenir au titre du sujet, Wolfowitz à la tête de la Banque Mondiale, ça vout fait quoi ?
Moi, ça me ferait vraiment mal au cul.


je pensais que le crime ne payait pas
apparemment si


---------------
Ne croyez pas batir sur nos dépouilles votre Nouveau Monde . ( Kateb Yacine )
n°5135380
marijuana
Posté le 23-03-2005 à 17:45:48  profilanswer
 

http://fr.news.yahoo.com/050323/5/4bw4n.html
 

Citation :

L'armée américaine a empêché des Italiens d'examiner la voiture dans laquelle est mort Nicola Calipari, selon un journal
 
ROME (AP) - Le commandement militaire américain en Irak a empêché deux policiers italiens d'examiner le véhicule dans lequel l'agent des services secrets Nicola Calipari a été tué le 4 mars alors qu'il emmenait l'ex-otage Giuliana Sgrena à l'aéroport de Bagdad, a affirmé mercredi le quotidien "Corriere della Sera".
 
Selon le journal, les policiers s'apprêtaient à partir lorsque l'ambassade d'Italie à Bagdad a reçu lundi un ordre du commandement américain visant à annuler leur déplacement en raison de craintes liées à la sécurité.
 
La mission diplomatique aurait alors alerté les autorités de Rome, lesquelles ont annulé le voyage.
 
La voiture, une Toyota Corolla dans laquelle Nicola Calipari est mort dans des tirs américains, se trouve actuellement à l'aéroport de Bagdad, où elle avait été initialement louée.
 
Le ministère italien des Affaires étrangères a refusé de commenter les informations du "Corriere della Sera". Quant à l'armée américaine, elle n'a pas fait de commentaires dans l'immédiat.
 
Les enquêteurs ont reçu des photos du véhicule mais souhaitent analyser les impacts de balles et d'autres éléments, selon le quotidien italien. AP


 
 :pfff:

n°5137083
san2012
Posté le 23-03-2005 à 21:47:43  profilanswer
 

Qui sauvera l'Irak des mains des Néo-Conservateurs ? Certainement pas Saddam ou ses fils ! :lol:

n°5137177
t-w
HDBNG club
Posté le 23-03-2005 à 21:59:02  profilanswer
 

san2012 a écrit :

Qui sauvera l'Irak des mains des Néo-Conservateurs ? Certainement pas Saddam ou ses fils ! :lol:


 
c'est cool t'as juste deux ans de retard  :hello:

n°5153221
Don Quidoc​te
Tu n'as rien à dire.Tais-toi !
Posté le 25-03-2005 à 21:52:01  profilanswer
 

marijuana a écrit :

http://fr.news.yahoo.com/050323/5/4bw4n.html
 

Citation :

L'armée américaine a empêché des Italiens d'examiner la voiture dans laquelle est mort Nicola Calipari, selon un journal
 
ROME (AP) - Le commandement militaire américain en Irak a empêché deux policiers italiens d'examiner le véhicule dans lequel l'agent des services secrets Nicola Calipari a été tué le 4 mars alors qu'il emmenait l'ex-otage Giuliana Sgrena à l'aéroport de Bagdad, a affirmé mercredi le quotidien "Corriere della Sera".
 
Selon le journal, les policiers s'apprêtaient à partir lorsque l'ambassade d'Italie à Bagdad a reçu lundi un ordre du commandement américain visant à annuler leur déplacement en raison de craintes liées à la sécurité.
 
La mission diplomatique aurait alors alerté les autorités de Rome, lesquelles ont annulé le voyage.
 
La voiture, une Toyota Corolla dans laquelle Nicola Calipari est mort dans des tirs américains, se trouve actuellement à l'aéroport de Bagdad, où elle avait été initialement louée.
 
Le ministère italien des Affaires étrangères a refusé de commenter les informations du "Corriere della Sera". Quant à l'armée américaine, elle n'a pas fait de commentaires dans l'immédiat.
 
Les enquêteurs ont reçu des photos du véhicule mais souhaitent analyser les impacts de balles et d'autres éléments, selon le quotidien italien. AP


 
 :pfff:


 
 
Cela n'a rien à voir, bien sûr:
 
 
 
Pentagon Kills Investigation Into Case of Abused Reuters Workers
 
News Standard | March 24 2005
 
In a letter to Reuters, the Pentagon says it will not reopen an investigation into the case of three unembedded Iraqi journalists who say US soldiers tortured and sexually abused them while they were working for the London-based news service last year.
 
"I'm very disappointed that the Department of Defense has chosen not to reopen a clearly flawed investigation into a very troubling incident," Reuters Global Managing Editor David Schlesinger said Tuesday in response to the letter.
 
The Pentagon told Reuters it was satisfied with the results of its initial investigation, which did not include interviews with the three Iraqis. It concluded its letter to Reuters by recommending that media organizations embed their reporters with US military units.
 
Soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division detained the three Reuters employees in January 2004 while covering the downing of an American helicopter by rebels near Fallujah. The journalists say soldiers beat them and subjected them to sexual humiliation similar to that practiced by US jailers at Abu Ghraib prison around the same time. They were released without charges three days after being detained.

n°5189977
udok
La racaille des barbus ©clémen
Posté le 31-03-2005 à 17:02:52  profilanswer
 
n°5190227
Kiriou
Vicious...
Posté le 31-03-2005 à 17:38:42  profilanswer
 


 
 

Citation :

"Le montant de l'aide fournie pour promouvoir le développement et pour lutter contre la faim baisse tandis que l'argent est redirigé vers la lutte contre le terrorisme et le renforcement de la sécurité nationale", affirme le document. "Et pourtant, la lutte contre le terrorisme devrait inclure des efforts pour réduire la faim, la pauvreté et les inégalités".


 
Voilà bien quelque chose qui ne fait pas parti des théories américaines  :pfff:


---------------
Si tout fonctionne correctement, c'est que vous n'avez manifestement pas remarqué quelque chose.
n°5190396
pm
Posté le 31-03-2005 à 18:03:44  profilanswer
 

el muchacho a écrit :

POur revenir au titre du sujet, Wolfowitz à la tête de la Banque Mondiale, ça vout fait quoi ?
 
Moi, ça me ferait vraiment mal au cul.


 
Les pays pauvres n'en auront pas fini de payer leurs dettes... :/

n°5190633
udok
La racaille des barbus ©clémen
Posté le 31-03-2005 à 18:43:51  profilanswer
 
n°5190907
hpdp00
bleus, c'est fou
Posté le 31-03-2005 à 19:20:46  profilanswer
 

"Après un examen exhaustif, la Commission n'a pas trouvé d'indications que les services de renseignement aient manipulé les preuves sur les armes de destruction massive irakiennes. Ce que leurs responsables vous ont dit sur les programmes de Saddam Hussein est ce qu'ils croyaient. Ils avaient simplement tort"
 
pas manipulé, le coup du faux achat de matières radio-actives au soudan par des soi-disant iraquiens?? pis quoi encore??
un rapport bien propre bien poli pour faire plaisir au président et justifier ses réorganisations oui


---------------
du vide, j'en ai plein !
n°5192720
blazkowicz
Posté le 31-03-2005 à 23:57:24  profilanswer
 

ça arrange bien la Maison Blanche ce rapport :
- légitime la ligne officielle qui est que tout le monde croyait qu'il yavait des ADM
- fait porter le chapeau aux services de renseignement
- légitime la purge de la CIA
 
 
que l'administration bush voulût n'entendre que ce qui lui plaisait, et qu'elle présentât systématiquement les "worst case scenarios" comme faits avérés, on peut oublier maintenant :o

n°5193059
Niko Teen
Anti Tane
Posté le 01-04-2005 à 01:00:56  profilanswer
 

Salut les gars !
 
Pas encore fermé ce topic ?
 
Spéciale dédicace à vrossi1 et abakuk sans oublier lootresha.  :D


Message édité par Niko Teen le 01-04-2005 à 01:14:21
n°5200903
Don Quidoc​te
Tu n'as rien à dire.Tais-toi !
Posté le 01-04-2005 à 23:44:58  profilanswer
 

De plus en plus clair!
 
http://www.democracynow.org/articl [...] 25/1516242
 
Friday, March 25th, 2005
Naomi Klein Reveals New Details About U.S. Military Shooting of Italian War Correspondent in Iraq
 
Three weeks after being shot by US forces in Iraq, veteran Italian war correspondent Giuliana Sgrena is released from a military hospital. New details are emerging about the killing of the Italian agent who saved her life. We speak with independent journalist Naomi Klein, who just returned from meeting with Sgrena in Rome. [includes rush transcript] In Rome, journalist Giuliana Sgrena has been released from a military hospital where she was being treated for a gunshot wound she suffered when US forces shot up the car bringing her to freedom after a month being held hostage in Iraq. The head of Italy's Foreign Military Intelligence Nicola Calipari was killed in the attack when he shielded Sgrena from the bullets.
 
Yesterday, Italian newspapers reported that the justice minister has asked U.S. authorities to release the car so it can be examined by Italian ballistics experts. The papers said the request came after the U.S. command in Iraq reportedly blocked two Italian policemen from examining the car.
 
* Naomi Klein, award-winning journalist and author of "Fences and Windows: Dispatches From the Front Lines" of the "Globalization Debate and No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies." She just met with Giuliana Sgrena in Rome.
 
RUSH TRANSCRIPT
 
This transcript is available free of charge, however donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...
 
AMY GOODMAN: : We're joined in Washington, D.C. by journalist Naomi Klein, who has just met with Giuliana Sgrena in Rome. Welcome to Democracy Now!, Naomi.
 
NAOMI KLEIN: Thanks, Amy.
 
AMY GOODMAN: : Can you talk about what she told you?
 
NAOMI KLEIN: Yeah. At first I want to say that I know Giuliana really would have liked to have been on the show herself to talk to your listeners and viewers, but one of the things that surprised me when I met with Giuliana is that she was quite a bit sicker than I think we have been led to believe. Her injuries were described as fairly minor; she was shot in the shoulder. But when I met with her, she was clearly very, very ill, and that's why she's not on the show this morning. She was fired on by a gun at the top of a tank, which means that the artillery was very, very large. It was a four-inch bullet that entered her body and broke apart. And it didn't just injure her shoulder, it punctured her lung. And her lung continues to fill with fluid, and there continues to be complications stemming from that fairly serious injury. So that was one of the details.
 
She told me a lot about the incident that I had not fully understood from the reports in the press. One of the most – and at first, the other thing I want to be really clear about is that Giuliana is not saying that she's certain in any way that the attack on the car was intentional. She is simply saying that she has many, many unanswered questions, and there are many parts of her direct experience that simply don't coincide with the official U.S. version of the story. One of the things that we keep hearing is that she was fired on on the road to the airport, which is a notoriously dangerous road. In fact, it's often described as the most dangerous road in the world. So this is treated as a fairly common and understandable incident that there would be a shooting like this on that road. And I was on that road myself, and it is a really treacherous place with explosions going off all the time and a lot of checkpoints. What Giuliana told me that I had not realized before is that she wasn't on that road at all. She was on a completely different road that I actually didn't know existed. It's a secured road that you can only enter through the Green Zone and is reserved exclusively for ambassadors and top military officials. So, when Calipari, the Italian security intelligence officer, released her from captivity, they drove directly to the Green Zone, went through the elaborate checkpoint process which everyone must go through to enter the Green Zone, which involves checking in obviously with U.S. forces, and then they drove onto this secured road. And the other thing that Giuliana told me that she's quite frustrated about is the description of the vehicle that fired on her as being part of a checkpoint. She says it wasn't a checkpoint at all. It was simply a tank that was parked on the side of the road that opened fire on them. There was no process of trying to stop the car, she said, or any signals. From her perspective, they were just -- it was just opening fire by a tank. The other thing she told me that was surprising to me was that they were fired on from behind. Because I think part of what we're hearing is that the U.S. soldiers opened fire on their car, because they didn't know who they were, and they were afraid. It was self-defense, they were afraid. The fear, of course, is that their car might blow up or that they might come under attack themselves. And what Giuliana Sgrena really stressed with me was that she -- the bullet that injured her so badly and that killed Calipari, came from behind, entered the back seat of the car. And the only person who was not severely injured in the car was the driver, and she said that this is because the shots weren't coming from the front or even from the side. They were coming from behind, i.e. they were driving away. So, the idea that this was an act of self-defense, I think becomes much more questionable. And that detail may explain why there's some reticence to give up the vehicle for inspection. Because if indeed the majority of the gunfire is coming from behind, then clearly, they were firing from -- they were firing at a car that was driving away from them.
 
AMY GOODMAN: : Now, can you talk about when Nicola Calipari arrived in Baghdad? For people who have not been following this story so much, the U.S. version of events of them driving to the airport very fast on a road with many checkpoints as you pointed out, not the secured road, that the U.S. soldiers fired into the air, tried to stop the vehicle, that they just kept on coming, and so eventually, they shot at them. Can you talk about how the Italian military intelligence official first came to Iraq?
 
NAOMI KLEIN: My understanding is he came the day before, and that he had checked in. U.S. authorities were aware of his presence. There was some kind of a negotiation process, but these details actually haven't come to light. The details that led to the negotiation, if there was a ransom paid. We don't know those details yet. What Giuliana knows is simply what happened from the moment of her release to this day, and her description is that she didn't see any of those signals, and she really wants people to know that she was not on a road with any checkpoints, and in fact, she told me many times that Iraqis are not in any way able to access this road. It's not the road that we hear described so many times as being a road with roadside bombs going off all the time, with checkpoints that you have to pass through. It's a completely separate road, actually a Saddam-era road, it would seem, that allowed his vehicles to pass directly from the airport to his palace. And now that is the U.S. military base at the airport directly to the U.S.-controlled Green Zone and the U.S. Embassy.
 
JUAN GONZALEZ: And Naomi, what did she tell you about Calipari? He was sitting in the car with her in the back, or what happened when the shooting began, and -- with him?
 
NAOMI KLEIN: Yes. I mean, she feels a tremendous amount of guilt, as you can imagine, and one of the reasons why she feels so much guilt is that Calipari chose to sit with her in the back seat. There were only three of them in the vehicle. So, he could have sat in the front seat with the driver. But because she was so afraid and she had just emerged from this horrifying ordeal of being in captivity for a month, he told Giuliana, let's sit together in the back seat, and I’ll tell you -- she said that he was telling her stories to try to reconnect her with her life, because she had been incredibly disoriented. One of the things that she has told me was most disorienting about her month in captivity was just that she didn't know what -- the difference between day and night. She didn't have control over the light switches, and because of Baghdad’s constant blackouts, the lights would go on and off at all hours, and she couldn't control the switches. So she really didn't know where she was. She says she has kind of a black hole of that month. She said one of the most terrifying things was that she would often hear U.S. helicopters over the house, and she was obviously very afraid that the house that she was in would come under fire, because obviously it was a resistance house. It was a resistance stronghold. So she had many reasons to fear. She was afraid of her captors. She was afraid of U.S. soldiers. And so, Calipari sat with her in the back seat, and he just told her stories about all of her friends, about her husband, about everyone who had been worried about her, about Italy, and that was the context in which he was killed. So it was his decision to sit with her in the back seat, and he was telling her these stories and reconnecting her with her past life, with her current life, when he died protecting her from a bullet. And she told me that that moment is really all she's able to remember vividly. That's the only moment that feels real to her is the moment of his death. In fact, her month in captivity, horrific as it was, she said feels like a far-away dream. All she can think about is the moment where he died really in her arms, protecting her.
 
JUAN GONZALEZ: What about the driver of the car? Did she tell you anything about what happened with him, or did she recall that part?
 
NAOMI KLEIN: Well, what she told me, and this is once -- an incident that I know that has been reported on in the Italian press, but not so much in the American press, is that after the shooting, she was very injured. They took her out of the car and lay her down, I think -- I don't know if they had a stretcher, but they -- she was being tended to, her wounds were being tended to. And the driver who was another intelligence officer called Italy and was on the phone, I think, with Berlusconi, she said, and he said, our car has just been fired on by 300 to 400 bullets. And as he was saying this, the U.S. soldiers ordered him to hang up the phone. So, but I asked her whether she had connected with him since the incident, and she said that she had not, with the driver.
 
AMY GOODMAN: : We're talking to Naomi Klein, independent journalist, who just met with Giuliana Sgrena, saw her in her hospital room in Rome. I'm looking at Jeremy Scahill's piece in the most recent Indypendent called “Checkpoint Killings Unchecked,” that says the Italian government, a close ally of the Bush administration is disputing what the U.S. says. According to Italy’s foreign minister, Calipari arrived in Baghdad that Friday after making contact with the kidnappers. Calipari and a fellow agent checked in with U.S. authorities at the airport as well as the forces patrolling the area. The agents had been given security badges by the U.S. to allow them to travel freely in the country after picking up Sgrena from the abandoned vehicle where her kidnappers left her. They drove slowly to the airport, keeping the car lights on to help identify themselves at U.S. checkpoints. It says, news of Sgrena's release was already on the Reuters newswire and on Al-Jazeera. The mood in the car was one of celebration until the vehicle came under intense gunfire. So this is also not only what you and Giuliana Sgrena are saying, but quite something that one of Bush's closest allies to the top, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi is now refuting his ally's claims and also demanding an investigation that the U.S. is stopping at this point. Naomi?
 
NAOMI KLEIN: Well, Berlusconi is facing elections at the beginning of April, which is partially why he needs to be seen to be taking somewhat of a tough line with the U.S. He doesn't -- he is not facing presidential elections. That doesn't come for another -- I think until 2007, but there are regional elections, and this was a national, obviously, a national incident, and he needed to be seen to be standing up to the U.S. in some way. But he's really been going back and forth, and this is another thing that Giuliana Sgrena was very frustrated about, because as we know she is very, very opposed and continues to be strongly opposed to the ongoing occupation of Iraq, believes that Italian and all, indeed, all foreign troops should withdraw. And in the – one thing that she told me that was very moving was, she believes that her release really came as a result of anti-war organizing in Italy across incredible coalitions, and she said that she feels like her life is a testament to what people can do when they get organized, and when they work together. And she is frustrated that that same pressure forced Berlusconi to announce that Italian troops would be withdrawn in September, and she really felt that the left opposition parties should have really maintained pressure on Berlusconi to insist on Italian troop withdrawal now. But in fact, Berlusconi has been allowed to backpedal on this claim, and now he is saying he didn't really say that; they will withdraw when Iraqi security forces are strong enough. And of course, Iraqi security forces -- it's not a training problem, it's an occupation problem. The reason why Iraqi security forces are not strong enough is because they're being massacred, because they're seen as an extension of the occupation. They don't have independence. And the continued occupation is the greatest problem to Iraqi security independence. It is not helping.
 
AMY GOODMAN: : Naomi, we have to break. When we come back we will continue this discussion and also talk about Paul Wolfowitz to be President of the World Bank.
 
[break]
 
AMY GOODMAN: We continue with independent reporter, Naomi Klein. She just met with Giuliana Sgrena, who has just been released from a Rome hospital to her home though she is still very ill, dealing with having been shot on the way to the airport after her release by -- in Iraqi captivity. Naomi Klein, the news that the checkpoint -- that the road that they -- that Calipari was killed on, that she was driving on, Sgrena, when she was being driven to the airport, had been set up for – that there had been a checkpoint set up for the trip of U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte to a dinner that night with General George Casey, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq to provide security. U.S. soldiers established mobile checkpoint, clusters of humvees armed with 50 caliber machine guns on top. It was one of the details that opened fire on the Italians' vehicle. Have you heard anything about this?
 
NAOMI KLEIN: Well, this would support what Giuliana told me, which is that the road she was on was not the public road that other journalists have traveled on, and that contractors and so on travel on, the very dangerous road. It was a secured road reserved for top Embassy officials, like obviously like Negroponte. But one thing that's very clear is that if she is on this road, and the way she explains it, she had to go through a U.S. checkpoint in order to get into the Green Zone. You can only access this road through the Green Zone. It's very, very difficult to get into the Green Zone. When I tried to get into the Green Zone, I had to go through six checkpoints -- six different passport checks. So, the idea that the American military didn't know that they were on the road, that they -- that didn't know about their presence is impossible, if she was, in fact, on a road that emerged out of the Green Zone. And I think that the idea that there was a mobile checkpoint set up for Negroponte obviously supports this claim very strongly. What Giuliana was talking about was what she was -- the only thing she could figure out is that the people who they checked in with in the Green Zone, the U.S. soldiers they checked in with in the Green Zone in order to get in, didn't radio ahead to these mobile checkpoints and warn them that they were coming. And from her perspective, that could have either been a mistake, or it could have been some sort of act of vengeance and anger, you know, and we know that there's a lot of anger at the idea that Italians may be paying very large ransoms for the release of prisoners. She's not alleging some grand conspiracy. There could have just been a broken down communication. But the idea that they didn't know, I think, is impossible, if she was on this secured road, because it emerged out of the Green Zone and you cannot get into the grown zone without passing through a checkpoint.
 
JUAN GONZALEZ: But even if there was broken down communication, it would seem that the issue of even just firing on a car that is moving away from you and is posing no threat to you on this secured road certainly raises questions of at least extreme negligence on the part of the U.S. soldiers.
 
NAOMI KLEIN: I think so. And I think that the -- all of these details will obviously emerge from the investigation, and we'll be hearing it directly from Giuliana herself and presumably from the driver.
 
AMY GOODMAN: Did Giuliana talk about her time in captivity and who held her, Naomi Klein?
 
NAOMI KLEIN: Yes, she did. I mean, she talked about this incredible disorientation. I think -- I know that you have covered the case on your show, and you have really stressed the fact that Giuliana's experience is not at all unique from the perspective of Iraqis who are living in this sort of pincer of the fear of being caught in a bombing by the resistance or a fear of being shot by U.S. soldiers at a checkpoint, and this is an ongoing fear every time Iraqis leave their home, and we're only hearing about this because there was foreigner involved, because it was such a dramatic incident. But I think the other part of the story is the implications for journalists and for independent journalists, because Giuliana Sgrena is really a hero, and she is an incredibly committed war correspondent who has put herself in situations of tremendous risk around the world. She has been to Iraq many, many times. And she went back to Iraq after Simona Pari and Simona Torretta had been kidnapped and released. She told me she has met with the Simonas in her hospital room, as well as several other people who had been kidnapped. She referred to it as the ex-kidnapped club. And she went knowing these risks, but one thing she told me that I think is an issue that you have discussed often on the show is the implications for all of this, for whether independent journalists can do their job in Iraq. And coming from someone who has been willing to take such tremendous risks, she said she just cannot figure out how it's possible at this point. This is because the people who held her made it very clear to her that they don't want independent journalists working in Iraq talking to Iraqis. And this was really one of the most disturbing details and, I think, a very telling detail. She told them that that made them just like Bush, because the Bush administration has also made it clear that they don't want independent witnesses talking to Iraqis, counting the bodies, highlighting the civilian toll of the war, but there are also clearly some elements of the resistance that feel the same way, and this makes it very, very difficult for independent journalists to do their work.
 
 

n°5207205
Salladin
Maître de Guerre /Jihad Master
Posté le 02-04-2005 à 23:07:37  profilanswer
 

http://freemanbox.free.fr/Irak.PNG


---------------
Ne croyez pas batir sur nos dépouilles votre Nouveau Monde . ( Kateb Yacine )
n°5207248
abakuk
Posté le 02-04-2005 à 23:11:48  profilanswer
 

Niko Teen a écrit :

Salut les gars !
 
Pas encore fermé ce topic ?
 
Spéciale dédicace à vrossi1 et abakuk sans oublier lootresha.  :D

J't'ai sonné, toi? [:itm]
 
Non? [:itm]
 
Alors dégage! [:itm]


---------------
Islamophobie | Rapport Obin | Test de pureté
n°5213501
sidorku
Ultime Boeing 747
Posté le 03-04-2005 à 20:29:39  profilanswer
 

Citation :

BAGDAD - Le ministre sortant de l'Industrie, le sunnite Hajem al-Hassani, a été élu dimanche premier président de l'Assemblée nationale de l'après-Saddam Hussein, et a annoncé que l'élection du Conseil présidentiel, la plus haute instance de l'Etat irakien, devrait avoir lieu mercredi.
M. Hassani a obtenu 215 voix sur 241 députés présents alors que le Parlement compte 275 sièges. Agé de 51 ans, ce sunnite originaire de Kirkouk (nord) est diplômé d'une université américaine et a dirigé une compagnie d'investissement à Los Angeles.
Porte-parole du Parti islamique irakien (proche des Frères musulmans), qu'il a rejoint au début des années 1990, il est devenu ministre de l'Industrie du gouvernement d'Iyad Allaoui en juin 2004.
Les deux vice-présidents sont le chiite Hussein Chahristani, un scientifique spécialiste du nucléaire emprisonné sous le régime de Saddam Hussein, qui a obtenu 157 voix, et Aref Tayfour, dirigeant du Parti démocratique du Kurdistan (PDK de Massoud Barzani) avec 96 voix.
M. Hassani a demandé à toutes les confessions et ethnies d'Irak d'avancer "la main dans la main", pour "mettre fin à toutes les corruptions, financières et administratives, cesser tout jugement partisan", ou encore "faire face au terrorisme".
Après la discussion de questions diverses, M. Hassani a déclaré que "l'ordre du jour de la prochaine session, qui aura lieu mercredi (matin) sera l'élection du Conseil présidentiel et le règlement intérieur de l'Assemblée nationale".


 
http://www.lalibre.be/breaking_new [...] source=afp

n°5232785
udok
La racaille des barbus ©clémen
Posté le 06-04-2005 à 01:11:56  profilanswer
 

http://www.lexpress.fr/info/infojour/rss.asp?id=6031
les usa pourront pas prétendre que l'arabie saoudite est vendu aux terroristes :o

n°5232842
timn-ber
Tomn-Hanks
Posté le 06-04-2005 à 01:25:09  profilanswer
 

udok a écrit :

les usa pourront pas prétendre que l'arabie saoudite est vendu aux terroristes :o


 
Les Américains, cela fait des années qu'ils savent très bien que sans leur support et leurs bases, c'est les islamistes qui renversent les princes saoudiens et prennent le pouvoir.  :o

n°5232871
udok
La racaille des barbus ©clémen
Posté le 06-04-2005 à 01:37:34  profilanswer
 

timn-ber a écrit :

Les Américains, cela fait des années qu'ils savent très bien que sans leur support et leurs bases, c'est les islamistes qui renversent les princes saoudiens et prennent le pouvoir.  :o


 
je sais bien mais depuis quelques temps (depuis bush fils en fait), les usa arretaient pas de dire que les authorités saoudiennes manquaient de fermeté avec les islamistes, que ça leur parressait louche et que ça pouvait pas continuer comme ça ... stou [:spamafote]
maintenat je connais pas les intentions prochaines des américains, mais ils trouvent toujours une bonne excuse pour leur action ... parfois ils en trouvent même plusieurs, et ça arrive même que l'excuse arrive en retard par rapport aux actes   [:anathema]


---------------
Non au projet de loi DADVSI ! (droits d'auteurs)
n°5232878
timn-ber
Tomn-Hanks
Posté le 06-04-2005 à 01:39:28  profilanswer
 

Ben ma réponse tend à montrer que les Américains savent pourquoi ils ne doivent pas attaquer l'Arabie Saoudite. Sous-entendre qu'ils ne font pas assez d'effort et que ça pourrait mener à des actions contre eux, c'est du bluff, mais vu l'enjeu pour les dirigeants saoudiens, pas de risque à prendre (t'as vu leurs Boeings privés ? ;) )

n°5233042
hpdp00
bleus, c'est fou
Posté le 06-04-2005 à 02:28:56  profilanswer
 

nouveau et premier président post-hussein désigné :  
 
BAGDAD (AFP) - Un accord est intervenu mardi sur la composition de la plus haute instance de l'Etat irakien, le Conseil présidentiel, à la veille du vote de l'Assemblée nationale
 
Selon le vice-président du Parlement Hussein Chahrastani et le chef de la diplomatie sortant Hoshyar Zebari, le chef de l'Etat sera le Kurde Jalal Talabani, le vice-président sunnite sera le président sortant Ghazi al-Yaouar et le vice-président chiite sera le ministre sortant des Finances Adel Abdel Mahdi.
 
http://fr.news.yahoo.com/050405/202/4clwn.html
 
un président kurde, même sunnite, c'est inattendu


Message édité par hpdp00 le 06-04-2005 à 02:29:18

---------------
du vide, j'en ai plein !
n°5233703
scOulOu
Born Under Saturn
Posté le 06-04-2005 à 09:18:16  profilanswer
 

hpdp00 a écrit :


http://fr.news.yahoo.com/050405/202/4clwn.html
 
un président kurde, même sunnite, c'est inattendu


Ca fait lgtps qu'ils en parlent, de ces tractations... Je crois qu'en échange le premier ministre serait chiite, mais j'ignore qui du président ou du premier ministre a le plus de pvoirs ds le nveau régime irakien.

mood
Publicité
Posté le   profilanswer
 

 Page :   1  2  3  4  5  ..  285  286  287  ..  296  297  298  299  300  301

Aller à :
 

Sujets relatifs
[OVNIS] La véritable raison de la guerre en IrakPour ou contre la levée des sanctions de l'ONU contre l'Irak?
levé de l'embargo sur l'irak[hygiène] lavez vous les mains apres vos besoins
Pourquoi l'irak et l'iran se sont tjs opposés ???[Irak] Les bavures militaires lors de manifestations
Les mains moites, sa suxxe vous avez des soluces ?[Topic Unik] Avis sur la guerre unilatérale - la démocratie en Irak ?
[Topic Unik] Avis sur la guerre unilatérale - la démocratie en Irak ?[Sondage]Notre politique par rapport a l IRAK a eté une bonne chose ??
Plus de sujets relatifs à : [Topic - Irak ] Qui sauvera l'Irak des mains des Néo-Conservateurs ?


Copyright © 1997-2025 Groupe LDLC (Signaler un contenu illicite / Données personnelles)