Reprise du message précédent :

Je sais pas si tu as lu "Le grand cirque" de Paul Clostermann, mais en gros il explique que quand les Américains son arrivés en Angleterre en 1943 avec leurs P47, ils n'ont rien pu faire face aux FW 190 et BF109 car il n'est vraiment pas maniable, ils le comparaient à un buffle ou sanglier ! Peut de gens savent qu'il est peu manœuvrable et qu'il faut faire du B&Z avec donc +1 pour toi

 
Oui j'ai suivi vos conseils: je le prend en début de partie et je monte tranquillement à 4000m avant d'engager l'ennemi. J'ai plongé sur un 1er bomber qui piquait vers une de nos bases, je l'ai découpé, je suis remonté. Puis j'ai choisi une autre cible, je me positionne, je plonge, je le touche mais il survit. Je remonte, je refais un passage: touché, mais il vole toujours.
J'avais perdu de l'altitude donc je m'éloigne et fais un yo-yo pour revenir sur lui par le dessous: gagné je le découpe.
Sauf que pendant ce temps je regardais pas autour de moi: derrière à 3km le B25 de BATMAN qui descend sur moi ... la suite vous la connaissez.
 

 
tu as essayé de le distancer vers tes 12h ou tu as "contre plongé" sous lui ?

 
mais bordel c'est pas un peu des gros batards de faire ça pendant que je serai en vacances    
 
bon ok, sur la plage je penserai sans doute pas a WT ceci dit!!!  

Et je pars en vacances au moment de la semaine RP x4  + golden battles  
 
Mon Tiger ne va pas se débloquer tout seul, sacrebleu !    

Au passage :
 

 
http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/

Je pense que tu rates pas grand chose car pour lâcher des avions qui valent parfois plus de 5k ils doivent forcément créer des missions qui te forcent à jouer des dizaines d'heures pour les avoir.

 
Pour les avions premiums, c'est clair. D'ailleurs, ils ne m'intéressent pas.
 
Par contre, des fois, pour gagner 100 gold il suffit de faire 5 victoires dans la journée ou un truc du genre, donc c'est carrément jouable (et comme un 7e équipage pour le japon ne coûterait "que" 500 gold...)
 
Après j'attends de voir. Si c'est tuer 80 avions/jour, non merci    
 
Dans tous les cas, je n'en profiterai pas !

Ah ben moi je serai en vacances, mais chez moi, donc je pourrai y jouer !  

J'ai essayé de le distancer vers mes 12h mais il venait de plus haut et avait deja accumulé bcp de vitesse. Je me voyais pas tourner a 180° et plonger sous lui ... mais c'était ptet la chose a faire

 
c'était la chose à faire  

 
    Lassar will we ever see the meteor mk8 that was fitted with the sapphire engines?
 
I don't think you will be able to see that engine on F.8 as modification as well as separate jet
 
 
    Lassar when can we see the MG151/20 as an engine cannon to be an option for the Bf 109 K-4
 
Do you really need to have this modification? Ok.
 
     
    Will we see some of the Czechoslovakian airforce? The Aeros and such. I'm guessing they'd all be premium, but still.
 
There were many small airforces I want to see in-game. Currently i'm thinking about it

     
    Hi Lassar, for when USA get there B-29, and when Russia get there TU-4, will Japan have a bomber to compete with them? For example,  possibly the Ki-91? The G8N1 alone would not be able to compete, as discussed in the Japanese forum area.
 
ki-91 wasn't build at all. So. As I said earlier there no way to solve it. R2Y is an only exception. Still the same situation is  for Britain and Italy as well.
 
     
    Is it possible that, after the A6M5c Hei and A6M7 are added to the Japanese tree, that we could also see the addition of the A6M6c and the A6M8?
 
    he the A6M6c Model 53 is basically an A6M5c Hei, but with self-sealing wing tanks and a Nakajima Sakae 31a engine with water-methanol engine boost.  
 
    And the A6M8 is an A6M6c but had it's engine replaced by the Kinsei 62 engine, which had 60% more powerful than the engine of the A6M2. And a bunch of other cool features.
 
     
    Also, maybe even a A6M4?
 
yes, it is possible. But i'm really not sure about last one
 
     
    Are there plans for any German carrier-based aircraft such as the Bf 109T and Fieseler Fi 167? (Apologies if this has been asked before)
 
And there will be no aircarrier they will be able to take of. It seems strange, doesn't it?
 
 
    Is the differing structural integrity (strength) of aircraft's landing gear modeled in game? For example, can a F4U hit the ground harder than a P39, without the landing gear collapsing?
 
 
Yes, but we have some boosters for AB
 
 
    Has a modification to add 12.7s to the Lancaster been confirmed? You stated in a suggestion that they were work in progress, but it is unclear whether you are talking about the bomb load, new engines, new guns or all of them.
     If they are confirmed, is there any ETA you could give us?
 
and you will see it very soon
 
     
    Lastly, I'm not sure if your involved with this, but anyway its costs nothing to ask, is there any chance we could see a Devblog for the EE Canberra, seeing as it is a possibility for 1.43?  
 
we usually don't show a/c that still in development (I mean unfinished artist work). I remember only one exception with Ho.229. We just wanted to save players time who decided to make it on his own
 
 

Vacances finies reprise lundi pour moi    
 

     
    The Me 410 B2/U4 had a modification in real life that would take off the 13mm turrets and replace the 20mm cannons with 30mm mk103 cannons while keeping the 50mm bk5 cannon. Can we expect to see this added one day? (it is even talked about on the aircraft's description card in-game)
 
well, it's possible way. But with all my references I haven't seen something about this possibility. BTW. Did someone make a suggestion on this four about it?
 
     
    Is any of the ground attacker/ naval Wellingtons with a 40 to 47 mm mounted on the dorsal (Ground attacker) turret position or nose (Anti Submarine) turret position to come to WT eventually?
 
Most likely no.All this experiments remained only as experiments
 
     
    Will you be able to use external fuel tanks in your aircraft and jettison them when they are empty?
 
We are about implement drop able tanks as well as JATO
 
 
    Will the Ju-88 A-4 be getting it's second rear facing dorsal machine gun anytime soon?

Possibly no as modification. But if it will be possible we will implement them with another version of Ju.88

 
    when will be see the tiger cat f7f?
 
when is a bad question

     
     at a later date after the canberras been in game for a while will you add modification be added to the canberra to have 20mm pod or will you have another canberra with has this option  
 
this early version will be without gunpods
 
     
    will we ever see swedish planes in the game

I hope so. Really hope that i will find a way for it
 
     
    do britian get a jet fighter in 1.43
 
maybe  s
 
 
    So now we have all the spitfires on the release tree. Any chance we can see the rest of the main spitfire variants used?
 
Yes. It is possible. At least for Merlin engine versions
 

     
    Will we see planes with more than 4 engines in the future?  
 
why not? technically we support this feature
 
     
    Is there any possibility for a German heavy bomber line of He-177
 
with difficult aircrafts we define versions only after we received all references and necessary documents.
 
     
    Also, is there any chance for the Ju-388?  
 
for now i cant answer. Maybe yes, maybe no. We are going to add more of junkers bombers
 
     
    Fw 189 Uhu - it has been said it might be a premium aircraft in future patches. Any info on when we can expect it? And whether it will be part of a package or purchasable with Golden Eagles?
 
When is a bad question. It's a quite symbolic plane to make it asap, but we have more important aircrafts to implement
 
 
    Ar 196 and BV 222 - Floatplanes have been neglected in the update German tech tree, iirc something has been said that acquiring them will be part of a special event. Is that true?
 
both of this can't take place of good floatplane. And I have no plans for them. The closest to this position on first rank is He.115 as a regular plane. And one more as a premium

 
    Ju 290 and Ju 390 - Two bombers that seem a lot more logical than the Ju 287, at least to me. Will they be a part of the German tree further down the line?
 
No they don't. On 1-4 Germans aircrafts have enough good bombers and with good bombload. Ju.287 is a bomber for 5th rank. It's not connected to why we are not implementing Ju.290 and Ju.390
 
     
    Me 264 - Amerika bomber. It really is iconic for anyone interested in the "Amerika bomber" project. Same question as above.
 
The same answer here. On 1-4 Germans aircrafts have enough good bombers and with good bombload.
 
     
    BV. 155 - Why is there no chance of it being included. I think I recall you answering that. It fits in the timeline, could have a great future in the German line once the Naval expansion hits!
 
First of all, we are updated Tech trees with really necessary aircrafts. And after implementing all these aircrafts we will return to other aircrafts question. But still. There no chance we will implement every aircraft, every prototype if there are some analogs in out Tech Tree
 
     
    And last but not least my most important questions, which you've already answered but I feel need to be revisited with the update on the policy of tanks that fit into the timeline. I have received no answer as to why the Ta 183technology dated from 1942 and used later on in the production of the FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II, influenced the Saab J-29 Tunnan, the MiG-15 and Republic F-84F Thunderstreak can not be used, when quite Stona said that the ZSU-57-2 fit into the timeline because it was a technology from earlier developed into a produced tank later on. This goes for the Me P.1101 later on developed into a Bell X-5. I honestly believe that these two aircraft are needed and would fit right into a very unbalanced and unenjoyable gap in the German tech tree - the post war jets before the Korean era ones.
    I am sorry if I am repeating the questions of others but I would like more of an explanation.
 
German will not receive any aircrafts that wasn't built at least (Ta.183 and P.1101). They will find its future in project of others countries. And if they will be, the will be as a premiums, but still not in German Tech Tree

BH OPERATION SAIPAN COTE JAPONAIS ( c'est important de le noter, cf. première image)
PRESENTS FOESTUS FORZA STUKKA BEX
1 G4M1 1 G5N1 2 KI 84 HAYATE
 
Si vous lisez les objectifs vous comprendrez tout de suite pourquoi cette mission était foirée d'avance, sachant qu'un grand nombre de couillons appliquent les ordres reçus sans discernement aucun.
 

 
Les bombardiers loin devant les chasseurs plongent sur les bateaux AA. Forcément un bel oiseau tel que le G5N1 attire les viandards avides de trophés. Et après ils s'étonneront de la disparition de ces élégants géants des cieux !
 

 
Un répit mis à profit par le G4M1 pour réaliser un joli doublé.
 


 
"Trop coule " dixit STUKKA  
 
Le RTB n'est pas de tout repos : bel effet pyrotechnique du G4M1 !
 

 
Pendant ce temps un coéquipier a trouvé une solution radicale pour régler le problème des boat people qui envahissent nos plages.  
 

 
et Forza tombe dans les embouteillages de départ en vacances  
 

 
 Un Spit déboule  d'un itinéris bis à quelques encablures de là  
 

 
Je décide d'expliquer ma façon de penser à ce resquilleur    
 

 
Résultat la famille Spit se  fâche et exige réparation immédiate, voilà c'est fait    
 

 
Forza dans une position délicate dont il se sort avec brio mais non sans dégâts  
 

 

 
Selon lui les larges ouvertures dans le fuselage permettent d'évacuer efficacement du cockpit les gaz délétères  produits suite à la consommation de sushis à la date de péremption dépassée.
 
RTB pour le survivant de la team en arrosant délicatement au passage quelques IA.
 
Un grand classique au-dessus de l'aérodrome : passage facial avec le dernier Spit, parce qu'il n'y a pas de mal à se faire du bien.
 

 
Aïe là si ! Faut se poser d'urgence, mais si vous êtes observateurs vous remarquerez sur le côté gauche du fuselage au niveau de la cocarde un accessoire pour le moins indispensable à cet exercice.

 
Oui gagné !
 

 
La réparation va être plus longue que prévue, prendra peut-être même jusqu'à la fin de la guerre, vu que des chars viennent de se garer en bout de piste.  
 
 

 
L'avion étant quasi hors contrôle, il ne reste qu'une seule solution. A votre avis, honorabru ou pas ?
 

 
En espérant avoir partagé avec vous le plaisir que nous avons eu de voler ensemble, merci en tout cas d'avoir pris le temps de lire ce CR !  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Je décerne une médaille à Bex et a ses CR détaillés, pleins d'humour et avec screenshots s'il vous plait!!

C'est clair, gros talent Bex    
 
(et moi ça fait deux fois que je tourne comme un porcassou avec le G4M1 et que je me vautre en réaliste, cette fois c'est en voyant arrivée une famous salve de DCA   comme le disaient les bonnes soeurs à l'école "Arrête de tirer sur ton manche à balai" )

jolie CR

Merci messieurs! tout le plaisir est pour moi !
Serviteur    

   Any chance to see the HA 1112 Buchón/Tripala?
 
The same answer as for Czechoslovakian airforce. I hope i will be able to find some soution for this kind of aircrafts
 
 
    Is there any chance for the Me 263? It had more than double the current fuel capacity of the 163 and was extensively test-flown, if only as a glider (but this alone makes it more credible than the HGII, which you are already adding). It could be a progression from the 163 (however you call it) so people won't have to grind through yet another plane to get their 262s.
 
Currently we have no plans with rocket engine aircrafts
 
 
    nother interesting tidbit to further its case is that the Russians were inspired by its design to create their own prototype, the MiG I-270, just two years after the war's end. It never went past a few prototypes because of accidents while testing, and at any rate advancements in jet technology and SAMs made the idea of a rocket interceptor with such a limited range superfluous.  

Project closed after few crash landings. No way.
 
 
    Could you tell me what BR the 229 probably will have?
 
We can't predict what BR will receive this a/c in the end.
 
 
    will we see b 47 it has 28 x 500 lbs bombs
 
No. We have no plans for strategic bombers with jet engines
 
 
    in cdk b 29 has 40 x 500 lbs so it has airfiekd on two hits/drops

and this aircraft won't see a game in the nearest future. It's not tuned at all.
 
 
    When we will see fix for G5N1 tail gunner? It's should rotate, but gunner can shoot only in vertical right now. I saw it reported some time ago, but still nothing changed.
    Something like this
 
the similar situation is with nose turret of he.111. Well, are working with this problem.

     
    What I am referring to is the Hs 132 jet dive bomber made by Henschel.
 
I'm not sure we need this a/c at all. No flights but supposed to dive with high speed. Imave doubts that ww2 jet engines was able to withstand such dive modes and overloads
 
     
    Also, any ETA on the Hurricane with the dual 40mm Vickers cannons?
 
this hurricane will be with with hurricane updated series

     
    Lassar, you said that you plan to add early Mustang variants for America. Will this be the focus of patch 1.45-7 or can we expect some of these planes in 1.43?

Not in 1.43 definitely
 
 
     
    Would it be possible to see D.520 as a premium for Germany, seeing how the plane was intensely used by Germany's allies like Italy and Bulgaria during the war?
 
I think I have found more interesting aircrafts for German premiums in the end.  

 
     
    will there be any more deHavilland Mosquito variants incoming, such as the Mosquito B Mk XVI (definitive bomber variant), or others?

In current updated Britain Tech thee you will find F. Mk. II and B. Mk.IV
 
 
 
    Do a plane and a jet have of BR the upper limit and the lower limit?
 
    Where does BR of the plane rise at the maximum to.

Yes, they have. I'm not sure i can answer  the second part of question
 
     
 
    When a planned is implemented, do you think that there is the big change in present BR?
 
    Japanese tree particularly.
 
it's possible., of course!
 
But how... It's hard to predict

 
     
    The Japanese tree is really lacking some interesting low tier premium planes.

We are planning to remove this injusticeю But I will keep in in secret how we want to solve it
 
 
     
    when you have completely finished war thunder would you make it into a purchasable game on stream like birds of prey and a buy game on ps4 like birds of steel?
 
I'm not sure that WT is a such kind of game. It's MMO after all

 
 
     Bombers on their own are too vulnerable to dedicated bomber killers and will not be able to defend themselves effectively.
 
bomber alone is defenseless anyway. The same was IRL
 
 
    Is it possible to implement the following suggestion to fix bomber meta?
 
    The overall Meta of Strategic bombers still contain many unaddressed issues.
 
    When the DM and gun modelling are fixed. Bombers will still have the same issues as in 1.29:
 
    ...

and so on http://forum.warthun...17#entry3075717
 
I prefer to discuss it with you all in separate thread in suggestion section
 
     
    Is this going to be addressed soon with a lower GE cost or a higher reward or is the displayed reward a bug?  
 
it's not a question for me, unfortunately. But as I know it's not  a bug

 
     
    How many German plane coming in patch 1.43  

3-4. Not so many

 
    Can you give an ETA for the Do 335? 1.45? 1.47? or later?
 
after 1.47

     
    Have you thought, about adding more events for one gameplay mode (not just one for each) so that each nation can fly events every day?

No, I don't think it will be good for waiting time
 
     
    1.34 will bring fix on Japanese 20 mm rice cannons? its quite common to see sparks and puff of smoke w/o any real damage on planes
 
every session the same question. Yes)))

     
    Are you planning to add more ground targets for bombers?
 
At least I want to add them.
 
   
    Are there any plans for increasing number of player slots in matches? for like 64 players?
 
it's not my question, unfortunately

    Is the G5N1 and G8N1 getting FM fix in 1.39. The bug was reported several tines since Stone Age. Few hits by 7.7, the plane just becomes unresponsive to roll. I think You and El Barca should look into this. It's damage and FM related.
 
will be fixed in 1.43
 
     
    Will the Dora DM (whole DM, not only engine) be made equal to the Fw 190 A series DM?
    Right now the 190 Anton is 3 times stronger than the Dora in wings, fuselage, everything.

upcoming changes will fixed durability questions.  
engines durability issues,
detecting hits  
fire collapse issues  
 
for almost all aircrafts as a main points
 
     
    . will the f-82 be fixed anytime soon? it can barely make it off the runway.
 

It is ElBarca's question
 
     
    will the CF-100 Canuck be added around like 1.47 or 1.49?
 
for now we have no plans for this a/c
 
 
    Are you guys planning to make the cl13 to change sides to the NATO sides?
 
    If you can't will you be removing it from game or adding a counterpart on the NATO team  such as the F9 cougar or the F86K for the american and
    Supermarine Swift ?  
 
    Because right now the jet games in high tier is unrealistic and its unbalanced because the war pact countries have both the mig and the sabre.
 
    (I think removing it would be the best option because the cl13 historically and climb better than the mig15bis and it can out perform the sabres.)
 
    Thank you  
 
first of all, statistics with jets shows that it's not really true about unbalanced German side.  
 
F9 cougar is possbile after all, but no chance for F-86K. Swift is under big question. And i'm not sure we are going to implement it after all.
 
 
    Will the Skyraider have the toilet bomb for xxxx and giggles? :3  

No I think.
 
     
    Are there any plans to bring back squadron battles for SB? They were lot of fun and the sim pilots miss them.
 
As I know, there are some wort to do with them before its return.
 
     
     Will we ever see Random Nation que again in SB? Yall said it would be back, but we haven't seen any changes or news on it.
 
Cant answer. I just don't know.  

     
    Will we ever see the Grand Slam bomb in the game  

yes
 
     
    Also, can we get 500lb bombs for American fighters? I've noticed that pretty much everything starting at about Tier 3 only gets 1000lb bombs. 500lb kills pretty much everything-pillboxes, tanks, destroyers- and are lighter and cheaper. 1000lb only matters for cruisers, which are rare, and then you just put both 500lb bombs into it.  
 
I will see, what can i do with it till 1.43
 
   
    land-based aircraft and ship-based aircraft are mixed, but this will be divided ?
 
No. There no need in it. This aircrafts were used by the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service.
 
 
     If Shinden and Raiden has been implemented,  
    Interceptor Japanese Navy independent,become the tree?

No. There should be only 5 columns for researchable aircrafts
 
     
    Are you sure you wont add ANY paper planes, not only to japan but the rest of the other nations including the Italian Tech Tree coming soon because I dont want this game to become like WOWP.

Absolutely sure. Italian Tech Tree will see only aircrafts that were build
 
   
    Will we see the 5 rocket 'christmas tree' pods on American planes like the P-38 and F-82?  The gunpod on the F-82? and the other hardpoints on the F-82?
 
well, we are working now with hard points for F-82
 
     
     Will the sea fury be in 1.43 since we say the dev blog for it in 1.39, or will it wait for the FAA update in 1.45?
 
Sea fury will be with Britain naval series in 1.47
 
 
    In arcade all planes perform amazing feats of physics etc as well as damage models which lack g breaking and wing tearing etc.  This is part of the appeal of ab but have you considered changing the rules for ab FM?
 
     What I mean is a plane would rip at 600km/h in RB but in arcade it just keeps accelerating until it hits the ground but what if the plane just stopped accelerating and maxed out it's speed. Same with turning, hit max g and plane turns no sharper.  Would this not bring back some of the true character of each plane and balance to AB.  Like to hear your thoughts on thi type of FM.
 
DM should be the same in AB. In AB there are some FM boosters and it's not really mu question. Still with this boosters should remain advantages and disadvantages of each aircraft.
 
 
    I was wondering of the reason for the G8N2 and G5N2 to be in the CDK for so long
 
we have other plans for them

     
    can you give us a rough estimate on when are you planning the De Havilland Hornet to arrive to the game?
 
and again. When is a bad question. Not in the near future. I don't know what will be after 3 updates
 
 
    Looking at this source, G8N1 could carry well over 8000lb of bombs. Yet in WT the biggest amount of bombs is 3x 800kg (2400kg)
 
and what kind of bombs? Overall bombload can't answer what bomb presets should be. We have implemented all presets we are sure about
 
 
    -what kind of ho229/go229 are we going to see in 1.43?
 
     Will it be V3,V4,V5?

V3
 
     
    - The Br is based on stats, but when only 100 aces play a plane could they make a higher BR ,or not?
 
I'm not working with BR directly
 
     
     know you stated the MXY7 Ohka was possible, therefore I won't be like everyone and ask "will it be in-game". All I want to know is how hard exactly it would be to implement. Also do you have any mechanics in mind that might make it a viable addition to the game? Thanks in advance  

I don't think we will do it soon. It's not hard to implement, but it changes nothing
 
   
 
    Which will be the first top tier jet the british will receive?  
 
    Venom or Hunter?
 
Venom should be faster. We are working with it now  for some time
 
 
    Any chance we can see Australian built and designed/modified Mustang variants on the US or British tree? Particularly the Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation CA-17, CA-18 MK.21, CA-18 Mk.22, CA-18 MK.23, CA-21 with the later ones been equipped with better performing engines then their US counterparts.  
 
I'm not sure really.  

     
    Are you considering adding high altitude combat themed maps into the game, such as strategic bombing maps? (Basically guardian angel event but at a even higher altitude and against more variety of enemies like Japan and Russia)
 
I don't think that we need to repeat it for Russian and Japanese aircrafts. It optimal altitudes is  a bit lower
 
 
     
    Are you considering to have a more sophisticated match making? I hope match making can provide equal numbers of fighters on both sides
 
Matchmaking isn't my question
 
     
    f possible, can you experiment some historical tiering by service introduction dates? At least try it out in events? Or in Dev server? Right now the battle ratings are really bad for German planes.
 
Introduction date will be bad as for me. war isn't something balanced at all. Only introduction date is not enough
 
     Can we have more events for all the countries at the same time? Some times I want to fly my bearcat or other American planes but I don't want to fight things 2 to 3 years older.
 
it won't be good for waiting time first af all
 
And it's still event. Not a regular battles
 
     
     skins. Would you consider putting some off the historical accurate custom skins as "regular" skins so everyone can see them? Right now skins are all client side which kind of defeat its purpose.
 
we are thinking about it. Maybe
 
 
     mustang fan, can you tell me when will other variants of mustang make it into the game?  
     
 
In the nearest few updates

 
 
fixed    

 
 
   
 
+
 
   
 
cette partie là était vraiment sympa en tout cas
 

 
OUPS ! Suis pas à une bourde près ! C'est une de mes spécialités avec les fins de misions prématurées en torche +/- humaine

d'ailleurs c'est dommage qu'il n'y ait pas un bombardier style Pe-2 côté japonais, c'est de très loin l'avion le plus polyvalent du jeu que je connaisse, je le kiffe sa mère (patrie)    
 
et sur une mission comme Saipan, un avion de ce genre manque clairement dans l'arsenal japonais.

petite question pour acheter des golds vous passez par leur site et payez par CB ? j'ai un peu de mal a filer ma CB sur un site russe lol

 
je sais pas mais il me semble qu'il y a une astuce pour payer bcp moins cher en passant par le site russe plutôt que l'international.

Je passe par le jeu, ca passe sous steam et je paye avec steam.
 
Conversion en ma faveur

un post sur le fofo officiel qui fera sourire certains    
 
Posted Today, 02:13 PM
 
Hello Gaijin team,
 
 
 
This is a little "complain" about the survivability of bombers in the game. Lately I have been flying the b-17 with maxed out gunners and modifications, and still every time a fighter shoots one or two cannonshots against the plane it literally explodes!  
 
 
 
Its seems like the cannons are way to good againt pathetic 12 mm gunners.
 
 
 
So my question is. Will you make the bombers more capable of defenting themself? Maybe make gunners deadlier or more substainable against incoming fire?
 
 
 
Sincerly,
 
 
 
Thunder

Moar gunnerz, & moar armor plz gaijin

bah finalement j'ai acheté 1000 golden a 6 euro par paypal.
je dépense juste pour mes équipage en fait

via le jeu (steam) tu aurais pu avoir 2500 pour 11 €

OUPS le retour !
 
Du coup c'était un destroyer détruit par chacun de vous ?  
J'étais persuadé que tu étais parti en G5N1, peut-être parce que l'on avait parlé avant ?
 
Mille excuses si c'est le cas

 
Foestus a pété deux destroyers, et j'ai pété deux croiseurs.  
 
Il dégageait la voie aérienne, je m'occupais de ramener la flotte américaine à plus d'humilité  

 
2 destroyers et un croiseur    
 
on a mis la misère à leur flotte à deux  

 
Mes excuses mon bon    
 
La prochaine fois je fais moins l'andouille et on se fait toute leur flotte tranquille pépère    

 
mon jeu n'est pas lié a steam et de plus j'ai cherché je trouvais que des packs a 20 euros

 
avec 4 ki-49, je suis sûr qu'on se fait croiseurs et destroyers au 1er passage, et si on survit, je pense qu'au 2ème passage on peut couler un porte avions  

Ah et d'ailleurs, juste pour de petits trucs observés ces derniers jours en char :
 
Comportement débile : le "Pousse-toi" ! Après le "Pousse-toi c'est ma place !" avec les joueurs qui rentrent dans les autres parce que haaan, c'est un bon coin de snipe, voici le "Pousse-toi, je passe !" puisqu'hier, mon char qui fonçait s'est fait taper dedans à plusieurs reprises soi par des mecs qui faisaient du tout droit et refuser de mettre leur clignotant pour doubler, soit... carrément je me suis fait une fois pousser dans les cailloux du coin (en parlant de ça, il y a vraiment une carté méchamment buguée), mes chenilles ont pété, je me suis retrouvé en plein à découvert avec toute la ligne de feu qui pointait droit sur moi, et le joueur qui m'a poussé qui m'a sorti genre "Don't be a crybaby". Oui ? Don't be an asshole, aussi. Quand il y a de la place pour deux, tu évites de pousser le mec devant    
 
Comportement héroïque : en mixed battle, un joueur jouait en bombardier italien et...   le garçon faisait passe sur passe à fond et à chaque fois, en plein dans le mille. Il envoyait un "copy that !" quand on le remerciait ou qu'on l'appelait à l'aide, et aussitôt, il bourrait tout. Bravo à lui.  
 
Ironie du sort : c'est un obus de KV-1 qui l'a abattu. Mais entre temps, je pense qu'il a bien abattu la moitié des troupes d'assaut ennemies !
 

 
les italiens ne livrent pas que des Pizza, les pewpewvafanculo roxxent en trollfight