Reprise du message précédent :
Tu as bien désactivé l'instructeur qui t'emmerde quand t'es prêt du sol?

Damn ! Je ne vois pas du tout de quoi tu parles, du coup je suppose que non ...
 
Je précise que je ne joue qu'en arcade (si ça change qqchose ..)

Oui moi aussi il me fait chier
Y'a un moyen de le virer pour pouvoir se crasher comme on veut ?

   With the topic of an Italian tree's introduction becoming more discussed I have been wondering what may be planned for the planes already i the german tree.  Will they be removed and placed in the Italian tree with progress retained or will they stay where they are and be duplicated in the Italian tree?
 
All Italian aircrafts we have now will be moved to Italian Tech Tree with saving progress.
 
    Will there be more ammo options for MG 151 15mm gun? Also, whill there be an option for MG 151 gunpod for planes that used them?
 
I remember some issues about it. I think It will be fixed.  Gunpods are possible, of course! If you know some suggection threads about it, please, send me links to them
 
 
    Regarding the R2Y2 and the blueprint argument about all the Me 262s and such (Overrated much? /o/):
     Earlier in the development of the game, before Japan and Germany received Sabres (And a MiG in the case of the GDR), it was decided that aircrafts that were never actually built or flown and had only estimated performance, figures and models on paper, as in blueprints aircrafts, will not be making an appearance in the game.  
    Yet, we now have three variants of a Japanese aircraft derived from the R2Y1 Recon prototype, the R2Y2 Light Bomber, of which none existed. And in addition to that, the Me 262 HG II may also make an appearance.
    What has driven you to make such a radical change of pace, even though it is true that Japan may be lacking in jet aircrafts when compared to other air forces.
 
    Also, I would like to correct, unless you have another source of information that I never heard of: The Me 262 HG II never took into the skies. In fact, it was never built. The closest to it being built was the Me 262 V9, or more commonly known as the Me 262 HG I, which had (If memory serves right) slightly more swept wings and a low drag cockpit to increase the aircraft's air speed, although it wasn't much faster than the serially produced variants.
    However, it is the Me 262 HG II and III that had the more impressive changes over the HG I and all serially produced Me 262s. The HG II sported wings swept at a 35 degrees angle and a V-shaped tail, while the HG III had its wings angled at 45 degrees and had the engine turbines embedded within the root of the wings, close to the fuselage.
 
    These changes would have made both aircrafts sufficiently more faster than standard jet aircrafts of that time, which in the case of the HG II concerns me about its combat capabilities against post war and even Korean war aircrafts. What are your own thoughts about it, Lassar?
 
(I'm not sure my English will allow me to answer as full as in Russian, but i will try)
First, I need to remind what I was said in Japanese Tech Tree update topic and in R2Y2 announcement topic. R2Y2 is an exception for Japan just because there no way to make it stronger with jets bombers/attackers on 5th rank. R2Y is good for this purpose. Its glider was build at least. This hard decision makes us to act accurate but it's necessary anyway. They won't be OP. It's just impossible. As well for Me.262 HG II. It was build in metal. But even with HeS 011 it will be impossible to be as powerful as Korean jets.
 
And I just believe, that implementing nation speciality is good for WT and WT players. We still have work to do with Events, we still have some problems to make all nations interesting to play.
 
 
    Alright, so currently there night maps are rare. Before they used to be common till they were removed due to the Simulator Community not liking it, and it was just made rare for all modes. Is there anything about night map chances in AB/RB being increased? Or could you move this on to happen? Night battles would be fun combined with small maps in RB like Peleliu. I realise this might not be the right place to ask but I hope you can give an answer.
 
I will see what can I do. If it's possible you will see changes quite soon
 
 
    -Is the B7A2 going to get its full ammoload.......it has 240 rounds of 20mms but I read that it had 400 rounds of 20mm......this would make it far better....can you look at it ???
 
Yes. It will have. In 1.43

 
    The new Mig-3U with the cannons....has 200 rounds of 20mm but in real life it had 300 rounds....150 rounds for each cannon....will this be changed in the future???

Our historical consultant provide us with information that this aircraft should have 100 rounds per cannon

 
    Also I would like to know what you think about the "Suchoi Su-8".....after the ASAP russian tree is finished...is there a possibility to see this plane in the near future or would it be too OP....?????
 
I know about this aircraft. But in summary it's more possible to have Su-6
 
 
    in the updated japanese ASAP-tree we have the Kitsuka and the J8N1 listed but both are the same plane...so are we going to get 2 Versions of the Kikka or is it just a Mistake??

It looks like J8M
 
 
    Are there are any plans to introduce G-force jams on weapons?
 
I suppose with jam on weapons caused by bullet hits.
 
    Are there any plans to make weapons destructible, so that guns (not speaking about gunners) can become disabled by enemy fire?
 
it is possible for fided weapons. But I don't believe there is a big chance to disable gunners gun without hitting gunner.
 
 
    Any news on ships that you could enlighten us with?
 
no comments, sorry s commentaire intéressant
 
 
    Also any plans on the J7W2 Shinden Kai?
 
No. R2Y2 is an exception. But I don't want to multiply this solution
 
 
    Any chance to see the Ju-290 in the future?
 
It's possible just because it was built and served

 
    Regarding the Sea Fury, any idea what will its BR be?
 
Close to tempest mk.II i suppose

 
    Hi Lassar,
    We were talking about french planes earlier and the fact that rank 3&4 were too few according to you. You also said it would be very bad to forget French Armée de l'air and the whole french players couldn't agree more, waiting to know the decision how to get french tree into the game.
    I just would like to make sure you have seen this proposal below with the finest selection of french aircraft and associated which could form a decent tree, almost as complete as today's Japanese one. None of the plane in this tree are paper-planes (we exclude them during selection).
    This may feed your project regarding french forces. And below, you will find a link to a complete thread where this French Tech Tree is detailed. I hope you will enjoy it.  
 
Hello!
 
I know about this tech tree.
But it's still not enough. I will see what can we do, but for now there are some ammount of aircrafts on each rank (from 1 to 5) 20-20-20-10-5 or something similar. Minimal amount of aircraft without premiums. So, I continue to think about it.
 
 
    When will more replay options for move-makers come?

All I know that we are working with new replay system now.
 

 
 
    Do you think the legend bf109g-6 three variant?
    Available G6 changed to G-14 ?
 
well, Bf.109G-14 will be as a real aircraft, not as a modification. And I'm not sure it is necessary  to make 3 simular version. With different engine - yes. But then it is easier to separate one aircraft into two.

   Will you fix the M2 brownings? They can burn planes down in a milisecond and deadly accurate - pilotkills from 1,1.5 km.
 
It's not problem of brownings. There is another way to fix it.
 
    Is the Fw 200 going to have the guided rockets (gelenkte raketen) as it was written in its article? If yes, how will they work and when can we expect the Fw 200?
 
Still no. It's not a big problem, but there are some hidden problems with its gameplay
 
 
    1,will the hunter f.1 have an air break as it did in real life?
 
As I said earlier no, it will be very first series without brakes
 
 
    will the hunter be able to carry bombs and rockets as a modification?
 
It it could it will be able to carry bomb and rockets. It's simple.

 
    will be see the hunter in 1.45 or later?
 
After 1.47 i'm afraid

 
    ill there be a prototype version of the sea vixen in game as a naval bomber/ attacker
 
Do we really need ше if we will have sea venom? It's possible for the time-limits events. Like La-174
 
 
    5,do you have any other british jets planned other than what's on the release tree like the venom, shorts Sparrin, prototype gloster javelin just with the 4 30mmm adens ?
 
4x30mm adens. Sounds like annihilation system. Heh sweet. But no. I don't have any plans for now.

 
    Will Hs.129 B-2 have it's automatic fire-extinguishers in the engines applied? (if so, when and in which game modes)
 
I want to implement this system. We have now some Basis mechanics in GF. So I hope it will be easy to implement and for Air Forces
 
     
 
    Will the Hs.123 be a premium plane, or a regular one?

Regular one
 

   When will high-calliber (30mm, 50mm) cannons be fixed? Few days ago I managed to hit an F9F in the engines from the rear (200m distance) with my Me262 A1/U4, the F9F just continued to fly, (hits registered and I got a few rp + sl), not even crits. You know a 50mm shell from 200meters distance in the egnies equals explosion, more so when it was a HEI-T.

Yes, the will be fixed in 1.43
     
 
    When will MK 103 & BK37 finally be able to kill player tanks?! I'm talking about T-34's (I think all models have same overall armor ) and KV-1/ KV-2's?
 
They must be able to kill some tanks. It was tested. But I see, that I need to test it again
 
    When will we see the PO-2/ 2-OP as a reward again?
 
As a reward - possible. It's a question for our community managers
 
 
    Possible added He 277 b5 and Me 264 ?

If I will see that we really need them.
 
 
    Is it possible for the P-39 Q-15 (Rare russian premium) to be available for players again at one point?
 
It's question for our community managers. Just because I don't know their plans on events
 
 
    Do you have any future plans to introduce non-tropical versions of the Spitfire Mk V series of aircraft, since they're not currently on the release tree? Or do you feel that the Spitfire Mk IIb and the Spitfire F Mk IX fill the same role as these aircraft would well enough at the upper and lower ends of tier III? Whilst the current Spitfires at the tier are still Mk Vs, the tropical filters (as far as I'm aware) do have a negative impact on performance.
 
Not in the nearest future. Not our work with spitfires is concentrated around seafires series.
 
 
 
    Are you considering to rework on damage texturing? Like add more damage spots on the planes such as:
 
As I have answered earlier, it's not only texturing, but updating whole visual model
 
 
 
    What do you think the Japanese.
 
I think that there will be some possible solution to calculating BR for RB and SB.
Due to mixed commands in AB it's not so troblesome

 
    Is there the plan of the map which did on the stage of Japan?
 
We have plans about new Pacific maps if I thanslate your question right

 
ça m'est encore arrivé hier soir, alors que j'étais en P39, je tire, gros boum, explosion, et l'autre gus,aucuns dégats  
Pourl es tirs d'opportunités à très haut différentiel de vitesse entre les deux avions, j'ai l'impression que c'est un peu Nawak, ça m'arrive souvent, alors que j'ai 15 de ping    
 
 

 
le nb de fois où tu touches un avion avec un obus de 37mm et plus (avec le 45 du 9K), que tu vois une explosion et que y'a aucun hit d'enregistré  

 
ET après y'a le reload time    
 
ça m'est arrivé à la pelle, et bien sur après je crève  

   The Fw 190 Dora series all have glass engines.  I have never taken any damage in one and not have it go black, usually it dies on the first hit from any gun.
 
Engines DM will be reworked in 1.43
 
 
    The Type 3 No.6 Mk 27 rockets used by the N1K are supposed to be air-burst phosphorus with a timer, but in game they're just regular HE rockets, will this be fixed?
 
If they should they will be. I will see what can I do with it

 
    Will the damage model of the B-24 be fixed any time soon? It was notorious for catching on fire quickly, and the wings were weak at the root and tended to fold up when taking damage.
 
1.43 promise some DM changes for all aircrafts
 
 
    As some said earlier the 50.cals are a problem, but for me its not the damage itself but how they keep their energy over the range. It seems that they loose no energy, because of this the damage isnt reducing over the distance.(at least it seems so for me).

No, the problem is in other place
 
 
    Is the Rollbug on the G8N&G5N being fixed soon? cause that is the most common death in it(slightest hit in the wing and it cant roll or use its rudder) and what about other bombloads for the G8N, as it could carry up to 4T(If i remeber correctly there was an 4T Bomb prototype)
 
Rolling is an FM question. And yes, we are working now about some additional weapon presets for G8N and G5N
 
 
    Do you have any plans to introduce early US Naval jets (for example the F6U Pirate, the FJ-1 Fury or the FH Banshee)?
 
We are working with FH banshee at the moment
 
 
    Are you planning to introduce spalling mechanics to Ground Forces?

I'm not working with GF
 
 
    Will British 7.7 ammo be un-nerfed in 1.43?
 
They not so "unnerfed" i dare say, but yes, really. the hit effects for every caliber should be more sensitive
 
 
    Will we ever see CA-15  (CAC Kangaroo) in this game? it was like P-51H but better, would like to see it for Britain as it was built by            Australian Common Wealth Corporation.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAC_CA-15
 
The question is where do you want to see this aircraft

   Also when are we going to see P-51H
 
When is not a good question. First of all I'm planning to implement early series of P-51... B, C, A-36 for example
 
 
    Lassar senpai, can we get an A6M3 Mod 32 Kai with wingmounted Type 2 30mm cannons? It would be a nice premium or even a nice addition to the regular tree. The low ammo count makes it balanced
 
Well. Ok. I will talk with out historical consultants
 
     
 
    1) Can we get an ETA of some of the new British bombers on the release tree (other than sunderland and canberra)?
 
Will be it enough if I say that 1.43 or 1.45 for example?
 
 
    Is it also possible that we might see the Boston premium bomber for sale again?
 
You should ask our community managers
 
 
    Will the B-29 have its realistic payload?
 
It will except nuclear weapons
 
 
    What teir/br will the B-29 be?
 
4 tier
   
 
    Are there any plans to add F4F-3S Wildcatfish? It's a float plane mod of the Wildcat. Not many were made, so premium possibly?
 
Moreover I want to see this a/c as a premium
 
     
 
    1. Is it possible we'll eventually see the Convair F2Y Sea Dart, the worlds only supersonic seaplane?

We have no plans for supersonic jets

     
 
    2. Another jet power seaplane any chance we'll see the Saunders-Roe SR.A/1? Apparently it handled fairly well but was never mass produced because the war ended.
 
    -->http://en.wikipedia....ders-Roe_SR.A/1
 
It's possible. Maybe like La-174 for example

Pas d'armes nucléaires pour les B-29 ?
 
Je ne comprends pas, c'était pourtant tellement dans l'idée du gameplay  

   I would like to know if the Arado C-3 is coming soon or only in the future, because this aircraft was already suggested a long time ago, but never was added:
 
    http://forum.warthun...r-234c-3-blitz/
 
    It's already on implemented suggestions because it was added to new Release Tree (or Tech Tree), but since its an old suggestion, does it have a priority?
 
    Also, will have the cockpit? There are not just me, but a lot of fans of this a/c, who really like to see a cockpit for this.
 
We want cockpits for all planes. Well, if it will be possible we will see it in 1.45
 
 
    So i don't know if this belongs to here, but do you have any plan on when the Me-163/Ki-200 Landing bug will get fixed ? I mean it's in the game since over a year now, from what i know, It's probably not so easy but woudn't it be able to write something like, when the plane gets under 50 km/h then deactivate dmg by G forces or, makes wings invinceble to ground dmg then, but only when trust is on 0% so that you can't abuse it or so, well i don't know if that would be possible to code or if there is a solution know, but we would love to hear if that bux would finally get fixed.
 
We have some solution for this issue. Better or Faster. The first one will be implemented some day anyway. But I really want to fix it in 1.43
     
    Japan aircraft increase appointments  at 1.43 the next update  
    Will TierⅠ 2 aircraft , Tier Ⅳ 2 aircraft ,  tier Ⅴis 3 aircraft?

I want to keep some secrets before dev will be open
 
 
    Will the sounds for Japanese machine guns change? Right now they sound like rain on a tin roof.
 
We are always working with improving guns sound
 
 
 
    When you say there will be more than one Horten, do you mean there will be one with 2xMk103 and one with 4xMk108?

Two Mk.103
 
 
    Comes the B29 with 1.43 oder 1.45
 
No. We are not going to implement it even in 1.47
 
 
    Will we see the Hs 132 at some point?
 
This a/c is in updated tech tree
 
 
    When do you think Britain gets the Venom?
 
really sooon

 
on a déjà de la chance que y'ai pas le B-29 avant 9 mois/1 an  

C'est dommage, j'imaginais déjà les parties    
 
"Bon les gars, on vole en formation.
- Okay    
- Moi je prends la base du milieu !    
- Okay j'attaque celle de gauche, mais j'ai pas assez pour un passage, qui me soutient ?  
- Moi ! Je fais celle de droite et j'aurais assez pour venir t'aider ensuite    
- Et toi Michel, tu fais quoi ?
- Les trois à la fois. Attention... je largue !"
 
ENEMY BASE DESTROYED
 

 
ENEMY BASE DESTROYED
 

 
ENEMY BASE DESTROYED
 

 
ENEMY AIRFIELD DESTROYED
 

 
MICHEL KILLED ALL GROUND UNITS
 

 
MICHEL KILLED ALL AIRCRAFT UNITS
 

 
VICTORY !
 

 
"C'est trop bien ce jeu ! On en relance une ? Non parce que j'ai un score négatif à cause des team kills dans l'affaire !   "

non mais    

    also ask this question. Both designations are wrong as well (J8N1 and Kitsuka) - J8N1 designation never existed and Kitsuka was a mistake by the Americans when translation the Kanji lettering and its actual name is Kikka. In the tree, they are not different planes, they are the same and it should be in the Navy only.  
    A7M2-J does not exist and its a miss spelling of the A7M3-J  
    Lassar are you going to fix these corre
 
we must
 
 
    a question: don't you think that adding too many prototypes or airplanes that were never used in combat (Ho 229, Do 335 , R2Y2, Xp50, etc)  is in conflict with the "genuine World War II experience"?
 
we anyway don't have any chances to balance aircrafts in regular online battles. Events - yes, We can fix plane sets for events.
 
Also I want to recreate the national peculiarities of each country.

 
 
    Is Germany getting any bombers in 1.43?

No, some of them will be in 1.45 i think
 
 
    Were scouting/spotting planes ever considered to be added? They could work nicely when army and navy are fully added in the game and get score for pinpointing enemies.  (aim cursor at them for spotting) This way the current spotting mechanics could also be reworked to be much less effective and place more value in recon planes/cars etc.
 
I'm always ready to discuss gameplay on these aircrafts. But now  I want but don't see any way to implement them and make its gameplay interesting. I hope I will take over this problems with our programmers
 
 
    Another question, Will more paper planes be added for Japan? There are many of us in the Japanese playerbase that are hoping for more to be added, along with prototypes for the higher tier aircraft.

No. R2Y2 is an exception for Japan for bomber/attacker role. I don't want to multiply paper planes in WT

 
    Will the XF5F receive its armament of 4 .50cals?

And documents that could prove it placed on .... ?

 
    Will we ever see the CAC CA-15 Kangaroo? it was Australian much improved P-51, Would absolutely love to see it in Teir4 British, at least make it premium (not 7000 golden eagles doe, we're not billionaires you know)  
 
    Q2. Are we getting P-51H in 1.43??? looking forward to get answers

I'm sure I saw this question before!

 
    Any plans to Introduce the Fiat Cr-32? I
 
only with Italian tech tree
 
 
    Also, shouldn't the F-82 have 25 rockets, not 10?

It will have, I hope, and very soon

   s there any chance that the Messershcmitt P.1101 will be added? It's prototype was 80% completed but the US captured the plane. A similar plane was made using the characteristics of the P.1101. (Bell X-5)
 
No. In history of German aviation there were enough good and flyable aircrafts.
 
        1. The Hs 123 was in it's later years given by the ground crews 20 mm MG/FF gun pods on its wings. Mainly  with some elements SG/1. Since this was a ground crew modification it was never officially recognized or documented very well. Will we ever see this as a gun pod modification ingame.
 
it's possible i think.
 
    Given how long it served late 1937 -1944 (in German hands) will this be listed in most eastern front related events. I don't mind flying this against La 5's onward
 
of course we will no include it where it will be useless. BTW. Po-2 take part in Korean war
 
 
    The Hs 123 B-1 did see combat with SG 1 later in the war according to this casualty list. Any chance we could see it as a premium?          
 
I can't answer now.
 
    4. The A-1 Skyraider was able to carry more than 8,000 Lbs standard bombload. With 15 hard points it was able to carry over 14,000 Lbs with no trouble in both Korea and Vietnam. Will we see this overload weight in game?
 
For the first time no, i suppose. But then it's very possible. Most likely we add all needed bombloads during dev testing

 
    Why are planes that were produced (in however small of numbers, but were produced) being seen as premium, especially when such planes as the I-185 (that weren't mass-produced) are researchable planes? I'm specifically looking at the BTD, the A6M5 Ko, the British premium Spitfire, the Fw 190D-13, and several aircraft in the RU tree as examples.

For several purposes sometimes  we just have no other way but make some aircrafts researchable. Otherwise they will be premium for sure. For example the situation with i-185 is simple. It's a good aircraft that passed all tests and it's only way to fullfill place between mig-3 and mig-9

 
    why has the japanese type 5 30mm gun the same sound as the mk103??
 
Why do you try airplane before it's fully tuned??

 
 
    Will you ever consider DOWN TIERING the 262 instead of doing the opposite for a change? Make it the same BR as the Meteor F.3 at the VERY least for a bit. Put it in the game and let the community test it out. If you truly believe that it should fight Sabres due to the player's performance statistics, then change it back. All I ask is that you TRY it... Can you do that?
 
I'm sure I've answered this question today
 
    Do you think that the game will be a nice future option, you know, when it´s completed, or would you like to work on any other project?
 
Hard question for me. Now I'm working with all heart for WT future. What will be next. Don't know. It's not a problem

 
    Why? British lacks any competitive jets to compete with MIG/Sabres, atm. We have been waiting for long time to get an proper competitive jet, we are asking for one for many months. Look, I think it is simple to add Hawker Hunter F.1 same time with FFA arm in 1.45 you mentioned about. It all takes one good jet to add while you can add 2 more navy planes in each tier.  
 
    Please, we really need Hunter F.1 to compete to order to survive in MiG/Sabre territory. Meteor F.8 is not simply enough to do this.
 
I ordered to collect full possible data for this a/c. This aircraft has ASAP priority. And even with this I have no idea when in will be.
 
 
    Sorry if this was already asked, but the Lancaster (And the Mosquito, I think...) are lacking their full, historical bombloads. When can we expect them to be implemented?
 
bombloads with AP bombs will be after reworking AP mechanics for bombs. I hope to add GP bombs ASAP
 
 
Well, that's all for today I think. Till Friday.

Désolé si j'ai pas tout suivi mais y'a une date autre que "soon" de prévu pour la 1.43 ?

 
oui aout

 
 
début aout j'espère

clair, +1 et relever les volets d'atterissage aussi, capturer a 500km/h fonctionne bien

 
l'essentiel c'est que ça arrive, après début aout, fin aout, septembre, je m'en fous un peu. j'ai déjà largement de quoi m'occuper sur ce jeu, et ça réglera pas le BR de toute façon  

Je veux voir les nouveaux avions  

Comment fait on pour désactiver l'instructeur ?

 
 
tu joues en simu
 

Oh merde... Non parce qu'impossible de faire toucher mes stabilisateurs sur la piste au dessus de 200Km/h  

Il suffit d'aller le désactiver dans les options.

 
c'est pas l'instructeur qui gère le vol ras du sol, c'est une option de jeu naab, retourne sur ton spad  

Ok car avec mon nouveau P-51 fraîchement livrée, j'ai du mal à faire de beau virage en bataille réaliste

 
Oh merde, j'ai un point golden la, je ne savait même pas, quand j'ai paramétré cette usine à gaz, je devais être trop pressé de jouer j'ai pas fait attention, my bad

 
bienvenue au club de ceux qui voudraient virer l'instructeur  

 
 
Euh si, justement. (l'abus d'alcool de riz est dangereux pour la santé )
 
Pour le virer il suffit d'aller là :
 
Menu => controls=> Mouse aim =>Instructor
 
Et vous collez les 3 options à no (c'est d'ailleurs la première de ces options qui gère le vol à ras du sol, le nom est on ne peut plus explicite...)
 
Edit:
Si vous êtes en contrôles simplifiés il y a une option supplémentaire à mettre à no.
 
En image, mouse aim:
 

 
simplifiés:
 

 
oui mais c'est pas l'instructeur "en jeu", c'est une option "hors jeu"

Je m'envole tester. Merci

 
J'ai du mal à voir de quoi tu parles en fait (du coup c'est peut être moi qui devrait arrêter l'alcool de riz...).
 
Les options que j'ai screen désactivent l'instructeur ingame, en gros tu ne le verra plus s'allumer en rouge pendant que tu vol, signe qu'il ne reprends pas la main sur tes décisions.
En tout cas ça va régler le problème de celui qui n'arrivait pas à caper les points à haute vitesse, c'est la premières des options qui gèrent ça.
 
Si je réponds à côté, méa culpa (mais du coup je veux bien savoir de quoi tu parles toi )
 
 

ce que je veux dire c'est juste une option à gérer l'histoire du vol ras du sol pas un problème d'instructeur en jeu même si l'option gère l'instructeur en jeu

Je débarque (encore ,je sais ) mais c'est quoi cette histoire d'instructeur ?
j'ai aucun instructeur en jeu moi (hormis sur les tutos bien entendu)

 
 
tout le monde l'a, en haut à gauche de l'écran tu as un "instructor" qui de temps en temps clignote en rouge, ce clignotement signifie qu'il prend la main pour modifier un paramètre de vol à l'insu de ton plein gré, super super pète couille  

ah ok , tin j'avais jamais fait attention !
pourtant il me semble que j'ai fait des trucs assez improbable (en arcade) style piquet de B17 etc...
et sans qu'il y ait eu des modifs particuliere , ou alors j'ai vraiment pas fait attention

Je me demande si l'instructor a pas le meilleur K/D de la partie, surtout en Dom, il détruit facile 20 avions en 15 min