Reprise du message précédent :
1) What patch can we expect the PB4Y Privateer (god I love this thing) and the Savage?
 
Not so long for PB4Y privateer. I hope to improve B-24 series as well as to implement Privateer.
 
Savage will require much more time. We will see. Still there will be more interesting aircraft with higher priority (But i'm sure there are some people who want savage so badly s )
 
 
    You mentioned being interested by the French Mystere IV, so am I, but you also said a French tech tree is not likely to happen because of the missing content in tier 3 and 4, and your reluctance towards lend lease copy planes in the main tree. So where would you have this plane? Tier 5 premium with the brits?

Yes, but still French is the last nation with the real chances to be as a independent nation in the game for now.
 
And about premium jets. We are not going to add premium jets.
 
 
    I'm lazy to do a bug report: the D520 7.7mm machineguns currently do no damage at all. They go through planes without hitting them haha.
 
I'm not to lazy to repeat that 1.43 will bring some changes about it s
 
 
    I am not sure if this has been asked or not, but do you think we could see the Ki-94 2 Ingame at some point? A suggestion thread was made and it details everything about the aircraft and why it would be great for high tier 4 japan.
 
I was talking about this aircraft with our historical consultant. I was told that we hardy could collect enogh data for this a/c for its implementing. So. I don't know. I hope we will return to this aircraft late.
 
 
    Not sure if this has been asked but will the P-51 get 150 octane fuel upgrade?
 
We have no plans about it. At least for now.
 
 
    Is the P59 Airacomet planned to be added at some point?
 
Chain Lightning? As a premium only... maybe
 
 
    Any chance for having M3 .50 cals as an upgrade for the P-51D-30 seeing how it has the post war USAF livery instead of the WW2 USAAF
 
At least it's not a big problem. If you send me some references, it's very possible that it will be in 1.43
 
 
    So, Lassar, there's no possibility of the Ta 183, the Me262 HG I, or the HG III? ;-; but, these jets would make Germany competitive with the Allies without having to use planes that are 1. out of the cutoff, and 2. are used by another country already. Also they could make way for very interesting senarios such as a "WWII 1946" event, etc. Also, they could be better balanced seeing as how they could be tweaked for better balance and NO ONE could whine about it. Consider these things Lassar.
 
I understand, but it's not a reason to play  more with fire and paper planes. We have already enough aircrafts for such event. And there no reason to add more.
 
 
        Is it possible we may see the Albacore and/or Swordfish Mk.II at some point?

I can't answer now. We are working with navy aircrafts for Britain, but all of them on 2-5 ranks.
 
    Going back to my previous question - So I guess it's safe to say the 109T and Fi 167 are low on the priority list, or will they not been seen at all? As both, despite being built in extremely limited numbers, did see some service. One of the 167's even managed to shoot down a Mustang!
 
Most likely that we will not make them. It's strange from some point to have navy aircrafts for air carriers without air carrier at all
     
 
    Someone asked this earlier in the topic, however it wasn't answered, so I guess I'll ask it here - Is there even the slightest chance for the Po-2 to be reintroduced into the main Soviet tree as an early Tier 1 bomber? Or is it simply 2 OP to have in the tree? s
 
Unfortunately it's not good to be reintroduced in our game. During WW2 it was night bomber with very specific usage. So it's odd to give it as a first bomber.
 
 
    to further question about the possibility of Ki-91
 
    It was a bomber that was built, around 80% before being destroyed by bombing raid. During this time, there would have been an estimated performance put forth by Kawasaki which you could perhaps use to implement the aircraft? It is not a full paper plane, and should be considered as an aircraft that was built, just not flown. Could there be a possibility at all to see this in the later future?
 
I agreed that Ki-91 theoretically has more realistic data than G10N, but still, no. I don't want to change my mind about "only exception".
 
 
 
    Also, would you be considering to add the Ki-94 II as Pvt_Pyle_ mentioned earlier? The suggestion made by Smin1080p shows the potential that this plane has in game, and would be delight to have for the Japanese player base.
 
I've answered it earlier
 
   
 
    Hey, I was wondering when we will be seeing the PE-8 & the Yak 30. to me both are really cool planes and i would like to know when we could start seeing them. Thank you.
 
We are working with Pe-8 for now. Yak-30. Not so soon. There are some USSRs aircrafts before him.
 
   
 
    Oh yeah, Lassar, could it be possible that we could get the Ruhrstahl X-4? It can't be to hard to balance, seeing as it was only marginally faster than the 262, and the pilot can't maneuver while guiding the weapon, leaving him open the gunner fire and escort fighters. just a thought (gunners could also shoot it if it needs more balance c

The situation the same as with Hs 293. I know how to implement them, but its advantages and disadvantages need to be studied still.
 
 
 
    Firstly, Lassar, you responded to my question about the MXY7 Ohka by saying it changed nothing, but I want to know exactly what you meant by that. When you said it was possible, a lot of the Japanese community's eyes lit up. I think this would be the same effect to both new and old players. Yes it is a novelty but it could bring players to Japan. Currently we are one of the least populated groups. This is because we have little in planes and end-game. While we are getting more jets I feel that it still may not be enough to make people want to play Japan over let's say Germany or America and cool little things like this may put us over the edge to get more players on our side

Still, i'm not sure that implementing kamikaze run is a good idea. It's a game after all
 
   
 
    Additionally, with both your confirmation we will see RATO and some of the pictures taken on the dev server that appear to show RATO, will we be seeing RATO on quite a few plains or will it be relatively specific on certain planes such as the Arado perhaps and the J8N1?
 
I'm planning to add RATO and JATO to all aircrafts who need this stuff

 
le nombre de fois où j'ai vu des joueurs T3/T4 essayer de capturer alors qu'il y avait des chars ennemis sur l'aéroport    

Franchement, pourquoi ils parlent du Mystère IV, alors qu'il y en a eu d'autres bien avant, à commencer par l'Ouragan en réchauds d'après guerre ?
Bref, faut foutre la pression sur gaijin pour qu'ils nous pondent un arbre francais !!!

 
avec du lend lease oui, avec du paper plane non  

 
Dit le mec qui voue un culte aux avions en Mascarpone ^^

 
non, nuance, je voue un culte à ce qui est différent, je déteste faire comme la masse, ça a tj été le cas quelque soit le jeu, je ne joue pas comme les autres, je choisis toujours la voie la plus difficile  

 
Tu as donc maxé la totalité de ton arbre des S79 je suppose ?
Comme moi.    

 
oui sauf celui avec des marquages roumains, j'ai des principes quand même  

 
Tu as une dent à ce qui touche de près ou de loin à la francophonie toi ?  

 
Oui, aujourd'hui 4 aout est un anniversaire noir pour la Bretagne, je le fête dignement même dans les jeux vidéos    

Any chance for 500lbs bombs on the Hellcat and Corsair? 2x 1000 lbs is kind of heavy to take off from a carrier with. At least since there is no use of wheel chucks in the game.
 
Well, I'm sure it won't be a problem to make it till 1.43
 
 
    Also, what ammunition do we really have in the MG 151/20? There are for example several different mine shells in real life, so which ones do the different shell types in-game actually correspond to?
 
there might be misunderstanding due to its localisation because of technical realisation, but all shells types are real and right.
 
 
    Hi Lassar my question is this are these following planes going to be added to the game at any point
 
    links to my suggestion posts

de Havilland T.55 - no, I was talking about this a/c with our consultant. It was just jet for pilots' trainings.
 
Fieseler Fi 103R Reichenberg - no. especially for control by players
 
Bachem Ba 349 - we have no plans about adding any new rocket engine interpretors.
 
Heinkel He 177 - This aircraft will be and I hope soon
 
Heinkel He 219 - the same for this aircraft. It will be in the game
 
Heinkel He 280 - I'm sure I gave answer about this aircraft some days ado. Anyway. This aircraft will not be in the first priority list
 
Heinkel He 343 - no, but we will have Ju.287
 
Junkers Ju 388 - we are planning to update ju.88 series (188 and further included), but i'm sure that we will do them immediately. Moreover I still have no plans about 288 and 388.
 
Messerschmitt Me 209 - Currently I have no reason to implement this aircraft sooner or later.
 
Messerschmitt Me 264 - will be added if we will really see reason for implementing. Still there are many good bombers with good bombload without me.264
 
     
 
    For later in the future when the Mitsubishi Ki-83 is introduced, will it the top speed of the 705kmh by Japanese tests, or the top speed of 762kmh with high octane fuel performed by American test evaluations? We want the test evaluation by America, but not necessarily because of its speed, but rather the fact its the best Heavy Fighter we have, and should be granted the best performance characteristics for its tier.
 
USAAF got 762 kmh with high octane right. But i'm not sure that Japanese Ki-83 should always use USA fuel s
 
 
 
    Also, have you spoken to your consultants about the A6M3 Mod 32 Kai with 30mm's introduction in game?
 
I'm not sure for now. Hmm. It's possible.
 
 
    Can we expect 'native' premiums for Japan and Germany in the coming patches? Right now, the majority of premiums for these nations are captured planes or simply reskinned planes already available in the regular tree.

Not in 1.43, but in 1.45 for sure

     
 
    Is there absolutely ANY chance that the F-100, F3H, B-47 and B-52 will be added into War Thunder?
 
F-100. Absolutely not.
 
F3H - very small chances
 
B-47 - no, unfortunately
 
B-52 - just never.
 
 
    Will the BF-109B be able to mount a MG17 through the propeller hub? The V4 could but I'm not sure if any BF-109B production model could too...
 
Yearly series of Bf.109B were able to. So it's possible that we will be able to mount this mg.17
 
 
 
    Is there a special reason not to include the TA-154 and the B-26 (which is not a bomber version of the A-26) in the us and german trees ?
 
Ta.154 could be. But only as a premium. Martin B-26 is not included just because there are already good 2x engine bombers. We don't need it ASAP. But later we will return to this momber

   You stated that some planes (exempli gratia B-52) can't be added due to balance issues. While i fully understand this in arcade, would it be possible to limit usage of such plane only to RB or SB? Or maybe only for events?
 
And still no. It's not good to limit players with game modes for several aircrafts. And you are wrong. It's a problem for RB and SB. For AB it's not a big problem while B-52 (for example) will be with both teams.
     
 
    If, when the Shinden and Raiden is implemented, characteristic sounds of forced cooling fan also will implement?
 
Yes. It should be. We are always working on sounds improving.
 
     
    Aircraft of high rank currently, Do want to move to the location of the low-rank?
    Does not fit into many of the Japan aircraft currently,  
    I feel that being in the high rank.
     

With new aircrafts there will be some relocation for current aircrafts. It's true.
 
 
     
    Japan plans to add aircraft of 1.43 update at the time but had been speaking with 7 aircraft,  
    Was introduced currently 6 aircraft.  
    Introduction of one aircraft last, the surprise of 1.43?

well, it's possible you will see it before, or after you download and try
 
 
    Will the Kikka have a form of RATO?
 
Kikka will be used RATO for take off. I'm sure. (I hope I understand you right)
 
     
 
    So now I'm confused as those both answers seems to contradict themselves, will the G8N1 receive something bigger than the 3x 800Kg bombs it have now ?  
 
    Here a link to a document showing some infos about the loadout on the forum :
 
    http://forum.warthun...load/?p=2815318
 
it should not confuse you.
 
I know about experimental 1500 kg AP bomb. Possible we will implement them. But I have no data about 2000 kg bomb.
 
 
 
    Someone made a detailed report one year ago about the number of ammos those planes are supposed to get, here : http://forum.warthun...iy/#entry845017
 
    This have seen no answer at all in one year, we still have 15 or 16 ammos depending the heavy fighter models.
 
there is no way to fit 16+ rounds in its nose.
 
 
    And will we get AP ammos for the 37mm's ( and 57mm in the Ki-102)  to deal with ground targets ? Right now Japan don't get any plane able to deal damages to any ground targets like light tanks, light pillboxes ( light pillboxes that are able to be killed by the US 12.7mm in game !!! O_o )  but i heard Japan used to have some big caliber AP ammos like on the 37 or 57mm, this will be welcome for finally be able to deal a bit of damaged on the ground.
 
I will see, what could happen with it
 
 
 
    Also those HE 37mm used to deal really hard damages before the 1.37 patch, now they often result in just a few lions and RP awarded by the server when the hit is detected, not even doing a critical on small planes, even a 37mm hit on a biplanes can result in a hit only reported by the server and few lions and RP rewarded only, it doesn't seems correct, they seems really underpowered even compared to some 20mm on other Nations that are able to deal more damages than those big 37mm, will this be modified so the Japaneses 37mm will finally be able to deal some damages like on the past ?

The same. I hope it will fixed soon

Pfff, dégouté qu'ils ne foutent pas le B-26...
Et leur excuse est bidon...
Ils ont qu'à le requalifier en chasseur bombardier, genre leur PB1J tout pourri.

 
au moins c'est pas une fin de non reçevoir  

Ca ressemble plus à un aveu d'oubli mais qu'on n'ose pas le reconnaitre surtout....
Et puis ca comblerait un tier 3-4 français...dommage hein ?! ^^

   ill we be able at some point to make our own custom ammos belts ? Like selecting entirely the ammos type we can put on our belts ? if we want stealth HE only or Stealth AP only etc etc and not be forced to use the per-defined belts selections we have in game.

We have no plans about it.
     
 
    What changes receive the Ho 5 cannons two parch ago? A lot of people coincide that was nerf.
 
I hadn't change anything. Really. All my changes are waiting 1.43

 
 
    ETA for Ki 61? B6N? D4Y?
 
Ki-61 KAI could be soon. But J2m or Ki-44 will be faster anyway.
 
B6N or D4Y will be implemented a bit later after ki-61
 
 
    will the canberra and b-57 have drop tanks on the wings i hope they don't as it spoils the look of the plane and will slow it down
 
Drop tanks mechanics is a feachure of nearest updates
 
 
    are there eny plans for another new tree after you have done the italian tree?
 
We will try to find a way to implement French Tech Tree. But it will be hard. Really

 
 
    are there any plans do add another canberra and b-57 which can expect gun pods if the one's that are going to be added under perform and are easy targets like the ar234
 
No. Surely no for the first half an year. It won't be easy target. I'm sure. Still forward fixed guns will not change the situation anyway. It's a bomber after all.
 
 
    Is it possible to see the De Havilland DH-155 T.55 Vampire for Japan?

It's still trainer version. So no.
 
 
 
    Is there the plan of an ente type and Pusher configuration plane other than XP-55 ascender and J7W shinden?
 
Not for now.
 
 
    what kind of German planes come in 1:43?
 
You will see)) Really) It's not so long to wait

Sachant qu'on a des maj tous les mardis soirs.
Ca sent la 1.43 pour cette nuit.

 
en tout cas ça fait 2 fois qu'il balance des infos confirmant une sortie très proche "august i think" et "You will see)) Really) It's not so long to wait ", donc clairement d'ici aout on devrait voir pas mal de correction, peut être un ou des nouveaux modes et surtout une 20aine (?) d'avions.

    Is the performance of the Japanese Ho-5 modeled after its design specifications (and early production) or after the late war underloaded ones (due to quality of materials/quality control)?
 
Should be after its design specifications (and early production)
     
 
    was digging informations about planes to propose adding planes in events (that link which I sent to you) and so I have a question about La-5.
 
It should be M-82A.
All La-5F should be labeled with this sign

   
 
    will japan get more jets in the future, ore is this the last time?
 
Very possible the last one for a long period.
 
 
    i know the swordfish is not a particularly high...concern s      but will we get the swordfish with rockets? also would love to see the sea plane variant in game.
 
It's possible, but not earlier than 1.47

 
 
    also this prob seems like a dum question but why dose it go from 1.41 to 1.43 where is 1.42?
     

1.38, 1.40, 1.42 are DEVs version.
 
 
    Will we see yak or lagg with vya23?And the yak9-ns57? THX

Lagg is possible, Yak-9 is not.
 
 
 
    Since the US has XP premiums and other nations are getting prototypes is there any chance of seeing different Hurricane projects as premiums? Ones with different power plants, armament or even the slip wing Hurricane?
 
All nation will have some prototypes. But I will not say current models
 
 
    1. Do we will see pilot cockpits for bombers like for B-17 models in future?
 
Yes, of course
 
 
    Are guys planning add Fokker D.XXI to game? source: http://en.wikipedia....ki/Fokker_D.XXI
 
we are planning some fokker aircrafts, but i can't say what aircrafts exactly

Faut aussi compter les chars et il risque d'y en avoir un sacré paquet

 
à vue d'oeil je dirai une 20aine de véhicules dont la moitié de DCA, mais bon en l'absence de maps un tant soit peu réaliste (à part "Koursk" en fait), pour moi cette partie du jeu est off limits pour l'instant. Par contre quelques nouvelles maps, je suis pas contre même si il faudra surtout compter sur le concours de maps pour voir quelques unes arriver.

    I apologize if someone has already asked this, but what armament is planned for the He 219? I've read that the A-7 model has 4x MG 151/20s in the front and 2x mk 108s as Schräge Musik. While this is respectable, I have also heard that the Uhu carried mk 103s as part of its forward-facing armament. Will we be seeing the mk103s in the He 219?
 
To early to discuss versions of he.219. This aircraft is not ordered yet
 
 
    I apologise if this has already been answered, but will the G.50s finally get their correct ammo count? Here's the G.50 manual, stating a total of 600 rounds:

1.43
 
 
    You previously said the Hawker Hunter may be released in 1.49 or after 1.47, but can you give the Hunter absolute priority and hopefully plan on releasing soon, say 1.47 or 1.45? The wait is too long and Brits urgently need a top tier jet which even the venom will not be able to compete within.
 
No. First priority without doubts for Britain  navy aircrafts. We still want to implement it ASAP. But there a lot of work anyway.
 
 
 
    Will the Mosquito get it's 4x 250lb/500lb bomb load?
 
    will there be a full bomber variant of the mosquito (the mk IV or XVI)?the British tree has the XVI but it is under attackers not pure bombers and so i don't know if it's a typo

well, there will be additional variants of mosquito. One pure fighter and one pure bomber as well
 
 
    will the ta 154 night fighter ever going to be in the game
 
Yes, as a premium
 
 
    will there be a korea mission editors with all the jets on like mig 15 sabre ect
 
I will see, what can I do
 
 
    In the future will someone be able to answer Ground Forces questions?

Well, I will ask my colleague about it

 
 
    his is gonna sound nooby of me (Not unusual) but will the b-29 be allowed to have a atom bomb? Well, of course I'd love to use it in historical battles, but if it's not possible, would you at least allow it to be used in a mission of some sought?
 
No nuclear weapons in the game.

 
    . in the damage model exist plans for make the  37 mm+ guns more efective in air to air?,  some times wen play wit kingcobras or ki 102 really feel like the big gun just have to much sparks or bounce and no damage registred, just dont feel the realistic touch wit normally we get wit 12 mm or 7 mm. i know depend of ammo too, but happen a lot wen you have hight explosives, you get 2 or 3 direct shots and just dont get eny significant damage.
 
Let's wait till 1.43. There are many changes in dm to make it clear from bugs. then it will be easier to talk about it.

 
+1 aussi.
Je suis allé sur WT parce que c'était un jeu d'avions et c'est pas prêt de changer.
Je suis toujours avec mes 2 chars de réserve et un T1 de débloqué pour chaque camp et c'est tout.
Si j'ai fait 10 runs en tank c'est bien le maximum.

 
Pas trop de DCA, tout de même !
 
Non parce que mine de rien, elles sont utiles quasi-uniquement en Mixed Battles, et s'il y en a des pétrachiées, plus personne ne voudra sortir son avion ! Puisque ça fait bobo, cette affaire. Surtout si en plus de sont des DCA blindées avec bons canons, qui du coup, pourraient aussi meuler un peu les chars à forces d'obus. Bref, je préférerais qu'ils essaient déjà de donner une vraie utilité aux chars légers, même si je suis moi-même joueur DCA.

 
ben les chars légers sur des maps aussi petites de toute façon, y'a rien à attendre pour eux  

   he render distance for the bullets, some planes have bigg guns and the capacity of get long range lucky shots if the pilot is skilled, but in certain point the bullets just disapaer, in some point the bullets will be have a realistic drop to hight distances?
 
Bullets have realistic parameters and life distance. 2 kilometres for sure. And more I think.
 
 
    n the future a player can get the option of make he own ammo loadout? choce the convination and type ammo acording to the nation.
 
We have no plans about it in the near future

 
 
    when will the new replay system be introduced?
 
When I asked about new airplanes it's ok. But i'm really don't know about replay system.
 
 
    When you introduce P-51H in future, it will have 90" in HG with 150 octane fuel plus 5 minutes of WEP (with ADI fuel)?
 
For now we have no plans to add 150 octane fuel to new aircrafts
 
 
 
    lassar would you guys ever add the P-47M into the game since american 1945 planes are looking quite sparce in most respects other then the P-51H and F8F
 
I don't see any reason to make P-47M ASAP for now, you can see it in updated Tech tree as well. There is a list we want to be implemented in the first priority

 
 
    Lassar, some people have found evidence that 3 different skins exist for the Ki-43-I on the CDK: a "Ko" skin, an "Otsu" skin, and a "Hei" skin.  
 
    Does this mean we will be getting all 3 as individual planes next patch? (in the same manner as P-36 A, C, and G were introduced)  
 
    Or will the 3 different Ki-43-I variants be smushed together and represented as 1 plane (perhaps with multiple armament options)?

No comments for now
 
    When can we expect the ta 152 c? What engine will it have? Will it have the option to switch the mk 108 for a mk103? Sorry if already asked.
 
I'm sure, it won't take a long time
 
 
    Will we be seeing a He 177 variant with the Hecklafette HL 131V quad tail turret?

from now it looks possible. But I will know more a bit later

 
 
    Why is the P-400 in the US tech tree instead of the USSR (CCCP  (SU)))?
 
because it was in USAAF service (35thFS, 8thFG, 5thAF, USAAF)
 

   Correct me if i'm wrong but isn't the P-40 a P-39 the british modified because they hated it then sent it away and eventually found use in the USS
 
Not for P-40, but yes for P-39. Only USSR pilots showed full strength of P-39s

   
 
    TA on B29? What are some planes you are PERSONALLY looking forward to flying in 1.43? I heard rummors that B29 won't be getting the one 20mm on the early version. Why?
 
B-29 won't be very soon. I'm personally looking for some aircrafts we haven't showed yet
 
     
 
    Is it possible to know which planes do you have exactly planned for 1.43? There have been many threads about the different planes you are working on like the sea fury, Do 335, etc. Is it possible to know which exact planes will be part of 1.43? You've mentioned planes here and there like 1.47 for Do 335 and sea fury but an actual organized list? You said we should see 1.43 before the summer ends and summer is coming to an end Thank you.
 
I'm not really want to open all my plans I have definite plans for next few patches
 
 
 
    Is there any chance of the Ki-61-1c Hei getting a logical FM?  At the moment the plane is so sluggish it feels like its dragging the Yamato's anchor around with it, when at most it only weighed about 300kg more than the Otsu (probably less).
 
It is a question for ElBarca
 
 
 
    Also, would it be possible for AB to limit plane speeds to their RB wing-break speed, and prevent them turning faster at the point when in RB G-forces would start tearing things off the plane?
 
Why? It's AB after all, really.
 
 
 
    And lastly, how about true elevator compressability for large bombers?  At the moment they pull out of high speed dives very easily, in fact many can jink around in the dive by waggling the elevator up & down.
 
The same. FM question for ElBarca
 
 
    Lassar, will we see some more Italian Aircraft in the German Tree before the Release of the Italian tree or do we have to wait until the Italian Tree is available?

I'm not sure. We are making our first steps toward Italian tech tree

ouais moi j'ai beaucoup apprécié le sérieux de la réponse  

 
Oui, enfin la question est notablement con à la base...
Est ce que le P-40 n'est pas un P-39 modifié....
Ben non banane....
En plus les 2 avions n'ont absolument rien de similaire, ils ne sont pas de conception brit, bref, le mec vit dans un monde parallèle.

 
non mais le mec voulait parler du P-400 je pense et a fait un oubli de frappe, le problème c'est que le dev te répond sans sourciller :
 
"les pilotes américains et anglais sont des tanches et pilotent comme des merdes, le P-400 est tellement bien qu'on l'a pas copié et qu'on l'a utilisé que pour la basse altitude"

[Special] The Birthday of Artem Mikoyan
 
From the 5th August 12:00 GMT to 6th August 12:00 GMT
 
+20% research points for MiG-3-15, MiG-3-15(BK) and MiG-3-34
 
30% discount on the price of MiG-9, MiG-9P and 20% on the price of MiG-15, MiG-15bis

 
Bon, ben je vais devoir patienter au moins jusqu'à l'anniversaire du Gourevitch pour pouvoir profiter de la promo.  

J'aime beaucoup ce jeu mais ni le mode arcade ou réaliste ne me conviennent tels qu'ils sont,
 
Arcade : Les avions sont bien trop boostés ce qui génère un gros nivellement des performances, possibilité de piquer à 700 km/h avec un bombardier, certains bi-moteur tournent presque aussi bien que des mono moteurs, les damage model sont bien trop permissifs notamment sur les bombardiers.
 
Pour moi il faudrait un mode intermédiaire entre arcade et réaliste : 3 voir 2 avions max, pas de boost de barbare comme l'arcade actuellement mais une évolution du réaliste pour avoir des avions plus permissifs, qui pardonnent plus facilement les erreurs -> retour de l'instructeur. Remplacement de la cible de visée par une bien plus grande en transparence qui donne uniquement une indication d'ou viser.
 
Autre problème plus général mais amplifié en arcade : pour avoir des points de recherche et des lions, il faut faire du kill du kill et encore du kill, escorter un bombardier ne rapporte rien, descendre un bombardier ne rapporte pas plus que descendre un chasseur etc ... Pour moi il faudrait réduire l'écart de récompense entre ceux qui ont fait des kills et ceux qui n'en ont pas, ce n'est pas parce que ces derniers n'ont pas un seul hit qu'ils n'ont rien fait : forcer un bombardier à descendre, servir d'appat, escorter un bombardier etc ... cela est utile mais non récompensé.
 
En réaliste je ne suis vraiment pas très bon et je trouve ca assez frustrant de faire 10 minutes de vol pour se faire descendre et devoir recommencer une nouvelle mission, rince and repeat, j'ai surement une marge de progression mais je préfère l'action immédiate.
 
Enfin débloquer les avions de tiers 4 et 5 est un calvaire, même en premium, les "convertible points" sont une incitation ouverte à dépenser de l'argent réel, pay 2 search, cet aspect me dérange un peu, surtout vu la blague qu'est le dernier event.
 
My two cents.

Comme je l'ai dit sur le TS, les extended maps pourraient vraiment changer la donne sur ce jeu. Parce que quand un Dev parle de parties pourvant durer des heures, je m'imagine mal faire des heures avec un seul avion, dans mon esprit ce genre de partie se fera avec full deck dispo, même en réaliste pour pouvoir s'adapter aux missions et même simplement continuer à jouer.

 
 
Certaines de tes doléances ont été écoutées quand même.
Avec les nouveaux badges de fin de mission, tu as souvent du teamwork lorsque tu te trouves aux alentours d'une zone de combat et que tu participes même relativement passivement au fight.
T'as plein d'autres récompenses de ce style qui boostent tes gains de lions.
Pour l'écart entre arcade et réaliste je ne suis pas d'accord avec toi car la séparation des 2 modes étant très subjective, chaque joueur voudrait quelque chose de different mais il faut bien trancher au final.
Perso, j'aimerais bien un mode arcade où l'on ne pourrait piloter qu'un seul avion, ca éviterait le ram à outrance tout en permettant aux débutants de se familiariser avec leur avion.

http://forum.warthunder.com/index. [...] or-heroes/  
 
Testing new game mode  "The Sky is for Heroes"
 
From 14:00 GMT August 5th to 19:00 GMT on August 6th
 
Dear players!
 
From August the 5th at 14:00 GMT to 19:00 GMT on August the 6th, we will introduce a new “Event” which will include a new “spawn system” for RB in the Event mode named "The Sky is for Heroes", designed to encourage activity in combat. This will mean that a player may use the earned points to respawn in the current battle.
 
A player can earn points by destroying enemy vehicles, dealing damage as well as capturing zones. He can spend these points later on respawns with any vehicle (air or ground)  set in the crew slots before the battle (as long as he has earned enough points).
 
 
Main Features of this mode:
 
    After starting the session, each player in the team will receive an initial 400 Points which he spends to get  the first vehicle to participate in the battle;
    Matchmaking is calculated according to the vehicle that has maximum BR in the line-up;
    If the player fails to earn enough points for respawn before his vehicle is destroyed, he withdraws from the battle;
    The number of respawns are limited only by the points earned by the player;
    A team wins once it accomplishes the mission’s task or destroys all enemy vehicles - the same as for standard War Thunder missions.
 
Maximum requirements Points for reinforcement respawn:
Anti Air vehicle:  200
Light or Medium tank:  300
Tank Destroyer:  360
Heavy Tank:  400
Fighter:  600
Attacker:  680
Bomber:  800
 
The given numbers are calculated if the vehicle you wish to respawn in has highest BR in the battle. If there are vehicles with higher BR than the vehicle you want to respawn in, you will need to spend less points.
 
 
 
 
 
E.g. if the BR of the battle is 3.7 it will cost you 300 points to respawn in T-34-57 and about 220 points to spawn in Т-34 1941.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dear players, you may have already tested this type of mode during the CBT of Ground Forces and due to popular demand it has been considerably reworked and will be available for further testing.
 
 
Please feel free to give us feedback and suggestions in this thread. This will definitely help to improve the given mode.

[Under Construction] City location "Poland"
 
http://forum.warthunder.com/index. [...] on-poland/
 

 

 

 

 

 
Currently in development we have several urban locations. We offer you a small video clip from our future map "Poland":
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNpwg4_5F3I

enfin de l'urbain !

 
j'espère que c'est pas du full urbain parce que là on me verra plus sur GF