Reprise du message précédent :
Vous êtes dur: la pénalité en Silver Lions est déjà bien lourde pour un TK.
Ça m'arrive pas souvent mais à chaque fois j'ai fini la partie avec un score négatif, ça calme bien.

Cela dit, je suis joueur 100% gratuit, et d'après ce que j'ai entendu sur le TS HFR je suis un des seuls et je suis très pauvre par rapport à vous. Donc peut-être qu'un joueur premium n'est pas assez pénalisé ... mais c'est pas en pénalisant ceux qui payent qu'on gagne des thunes en développant des jeux F2P ...

Moi et microminus, en réaliste, lorsqu'on fait du ground attack, je peux vous dire que les arbres ont intérêt à faire attention  
 
Sinon, en arcade, sur des milliers de kills, j'ai du faire au max une dizaine de team kills, sans faire exprès et en s'excusant sur le chat, dans 80% du temps, il accepte tes excuses. Les autres 20% cherchent à t'abattre le reste de la partie.
 
Des fois, t'y peux vraiment rien. Du genre, tu tires dans les 6 heures d'un ennemi, et un mec passe devant toi en vitesse supersonique, ben la, t'as pas le temps.

 
ben avant d'être premium j'étais à 1.7M, maintenant je suis à 1.3M, on gagne plus, mais en contrepartie on débloque les avions plus vite, donc on y gagne rien  
 
de toute façon si je veux gagner du pognon c'est en T1 que ça se passe  

J'ai du faire deux ou trois TK en tout, un qui me passe devant pendant que je tire, bon bah pas de bol.
 
Un crétin qui se met devant moi alors que je suis en train de shooter un bombardier avec le Yak 9T

le TK c'est pas bien grave quand même, vu la masse de joueur tu auras toujours 20% de crétin  
Hier j'en ai fait un magnifique de TK sur Gato, explosé au 47mm en même temps qu'un B17  

 
Pareil avec le Yak 9T jai fais un double TK a la suite en chassant un Do 217, un mec passe devant, bam...j'attend quelques secondes en ralant comme un porc sur le TS...je tire...bam le second

Surtout que t'as ce qu'il faut pour descendre un bombardier en un tir avec le Yak 9T. Dans mon cas le mec s'est mis devant avec un Yak 3, du 12.7 et 20 mm, trop intelligent !  
 
Il m'insulte sur le chat bien évidemment, je descends le bombardier sans problème puis descend un autre avion un peu après, ce con me TK volontairement en m'accusant de kill steal  

Ah le coup de bomber en domination j'ai fait aussi tiens  

Mouais, autant raler pour du team kill ok, mais pour du "kill steal" c'est idiot je trouve. Quand je vois ce que tu peux faire parfois avec un avion dézingué, entre jouer sur la finesse pour rallier la base et réparer, et la jouer fort alamo et descendre le gars qui te shootait avant de te crasher (déjà fait les deux)
Perso je préfère que quelqu'un s'assure que l'ennemi est vraiment mort et prendre un simple assist que de me faire pourrir par une brouette avec une demi-aile

Râler pour du team kill quand tu t'es mis 50 mètres devant l'autre en passant au dessus, alors qu'en plus il a un armement bien mieux adapté que le tiens pour descendre la cible : pas ok du tout

Des trucs intéressants depuis 5 pages ?

oui, un post très intéressant de foestus sur les techniques US d'évitement des Flaks Allemandes..... c'est a peu près tout

edit: et un Q&A d'un dev ave tout plein de questions qui restent sans réponses et d'autres dont la réponse est " soon™ "

Non moi aussi je suis en full gratuit et j'assume : ) même si le te commence à me coûter cher en silver lions. Je kiffe ce jeu.  Il faudra que j'essaie une partie en réaliste, j'ai pas encore osé.  Même si je trouve que j'ai progressé en arcade

event de qualitance supérieure (Saipan) côté japonais sur un *2 :
 
- 2 destroyers
- 3 croiseurs lourds
- 5 chars moyens
- 3 chars légers
- 1 assist sur un F4U
 
135 000 lions
12666 RP
 
 KI-49

Beaucoup de "probably" et de "maybe" quand même...
 
Sinon, pour le TK, j'ai dû en faire 2-3, le premier était volontaire, loi du Talion, énervement, toussa toussa, les fois d'après c'était pas voulu...
 
La fois d'après où je me suis fait TK volontairement, j'ai pas riposté, j'ai signalé aux autres joueurs de l'équipe et par l'interface, et black listé le type.

Nouveau Q&A demain sans doute, topal fermé pour cause de préparation de réponses  

sinon petite série de vidéos sur les nouveaux avions prévus soon ™
 
http://forum.warthunder.com/index. [...] l-digging/

 
Hey mitch,
 
Je suis aussi joueur gratuit. Tu peux monter vite tes lions en ne faisant que de la pillbox et du bombing en partie. Ca rapporte plus que de chasser. J'ai galéré aussi avec mes lions pendant un temps et maintenant je suis au delà de 1M et ça ne descend plus.

Encore un tk ce soir

Fin de partie tendue, on se fait mener de peu. Je fonce sur les chars ennemis pour profiter des roquettes de l'i-16 et faire un maximum de dégâts en un passage.

Le con se fout devant moi au moment ou j'arrose

One shot

Hier soir en event : pendant que Foetus se crevait le cul pour gagner la partie ( moult unités au sol détruites, des croiseurs lourds ou pas coulés façon Costa Concordia) moi j'avais décidé de profiter de la douceur de vivre sur une plage du Pacifique sous un palmier des plus rafraîchissants.
Euh bon Foestus moins de bruit stp en détruisant tes chars, y en a qui voudrait faire la sieste !
[img][/img]
Sinon un bug de texture amusant en arcade avec Infernhell : la mer à la montagne, non DANS la montagne, le rêve des vacanciers !
[img][/img]
 
Vivement ce soir que l'on puisse recommencer !

hier soir j'ai aimé le coup du leurre avec Forza, il est poursuivi par un F4U, je suis à peu près en contre sens, bon, en théorie le joueur moyen va préférer se faire un bombardier plutot que perdre du temps à poursuivre un chasseur. On va éviter de se mettre trop dans l'alignement pour qu'il essaye de faire le job en une passe. je croise donc forza à ses 3h plus bas. Bien sûr le F4U mord à l'appat, je le surveille bien, et quand il est suffisamment près, je plonge sous lui, il me touche à peine et Forza en profite pour lui faire rejoindre les crabes au fonds du pacifique.
 
c'est beau le jeu d'équipe  

What is wrong with the B 45 Tornado?  
 
USAAF found out that there were problem using this aiplane, fuselage deformations, engines, big fires probability, problems with hermetization and so on. So this a/c couldn't solve the problem from the very start
 
 
    Are there plans to add first-person views for gunners?
 
We haven't changed intention for 1st look for gunner with one gun-point airplanes. But cockpit for all airplanes will be first
 
 
    He wants to know what changes might be planned for the wellington damage models, he says they are not taking as much damage and enduring as much stress as they could IRL, that they are too fragile.
 
    If possible, could you comment on how you feel about it's DM over the 3 game mode types, if it isn't to much of a bother.
 
Some changes will be in 1.43

     
    Hello I was wondering if you think there's any chance well ever see early era helicopters added to the game like the Focke-Achgelis Fa 223. I understand that it's unlikely because of how different they are from other aircraft and how few of these types of vehicles were used in warfare at the time, but I figured i might as well ask.
 
Well, I don't think it will be implemented (if it will be!) as a vehicles for players.  

 
    Are there any plans on selective matchmaking? "Selective" in the sense that the matchmaker takes into consideration the vehicle/aircraft type and regulates their number? So let's say: For a 5.7 BR match up of 8 players, only a maximum of 3 is allowed bombers and only 2 players would have a the top BR machine... etc. etc.
 
No matchmaking questions. I can resend your wishes, but It's all I can do with it. As a maximum I can correct events    
 
 
        Are there intentions to return the Duels event for Simulator Battles, since the Simulator Squadron Battles have been removed?

As I know we don't remove them of permanently

 
    Are there intentions to correct the Simulator Squadron Rankings, since they still reflect the old method with Simulator Squadron Battles?

As I know there should be some fixes very soon
 
 
        Most [Air] Simulator pilots really liked the Simulator Squadron Battles, but thought the 8v8 was too hard to fill.  As you are aware, there are a plethora of active pilots flying in Arcade and Realistic.  However, for Simulator [Air] combat we have squadrons that would have at most 6-7 on at one time to full fill the squadron battles.  We were suggesting to reduce the amount of players needed to start the squadron battles to a minimum of 5 or 6.  I believe this would truly bring the Simulator Air Squadron Battles to an all time high.. and you can keep your current Simulator Squadron Rankings.
 
Currently we are experimenting with Join In Progress system.  

 
        Currently the Simulator Squadron Rankings reflect [Air] and [Tank] deaths where the overall Simulator Squadron K/D ratio is skewed.  Would it be possible to allow for [Air] and [Tank] separate scoring to help differentiate between these battles?
 

Logically it should be that way
 
        http://forum.warthunder.com/index. [...] on-system/     <- j'aime cette idée
I will look at it a bit later

   will the bomber spawn alt be changed to the same as the fighters to stop bomb running?
 
I don't believe that it will improve situation. It will make gameplay on slow bombers even worse
 
     
    Any ETA for the FAA line?
 
Sorry? can you be more specific?
 
 
    Any ETA on when we might see a preliminary Italian release tree similar to those priority ones shown recently?
 
we intend to show Italian tech tree till the end of the year    
 
     
    What is the current focus when it comes to Japan? More late or early aircraft or is the plan to increase the amount of aircraft across all tiers?
 
I can say only some common words about what we are planning to implement after 1.43.  Ki-44 series, Ki-21 series, J2M series. No words about what models, when and in what order
 
     
    Currently some bombers like the B-17 can fly on black wings, elevators, and even without entire tail sections, meanwhile some bombers like the G8N1 can only suffer a pink wing before you lose control of the aircraft. When do you plan on tweaking some damage models, and if you plan on tweaking them, when can we expect those tweaks to take effect?
 
Some changes we will discuss during 1.43
 
 
    I saw the ki 67, i know that not is too near for the next patch, but, when is released, it will have his awesome maniobrabilidad? (perform loopins without bombs and soft controls in 600km dives)  
 
Well, any aircraft in our game should fly as his prototype IRL
 
 
    Will British planes get possibility to customize their armament in similar way like Germans?
 
    Mid Spitfires had wing possibility to mount different weapons (Wing type c, e), or Hurricane Mk IV or Mk IIB (pilots sometimes removed some machine guns, from 12 to 8 to make plane lighter). Would be great to see it in game
 
Gunpods are manytimes easier to implement than wing changes. But every customisation without changes in visual models are possible

   
    You said Hurricanes are going to be reworked. Any word then can we expect other Hurricanes, changes or can you say, if Soviet modification of Hurricane will be added?
 
New hurricane will be in the same time with reworked version. Yes. It will be added
 
     
    1.will both the canberra and the b57 have a modification option to install 4 20mm cannon pods
 
It will be early versions for the first time. Without this option
 
 
    2. will we see a french tree after the italian tree as they produced a lot of planes and  tanks and i think they would be better to do the french tree first given they have both tanks and planes from tiers 1 to 5?
 
France didn't have enough or (even any) aircrafts for 3rd and 4th Rank. No doubts.    

    Are the early Mig-17s (variants A - P) still being considered, or are they "off-the-table"?

We have no plans about MiG-17 for now
 
     
    Is there a chance we ever see the ta183?

None
     
    how many planes can we expect for 1.43 ?
 
Many  s  
 
 
    Many people say the EE Canberra is coming in 1.43. Can you say anything about this?
    Also will Britain get any Fighters to it's jet lineup?
 
Yes, 1.43.
 
Maybe...
 
    Any plans for the Me 262 A-1a/U1 or the U5, or
    the He-280?

It's possible
He.280 doesn't have many chances. We don't want premium jets, but well. Solution is possible. Always
 
     
    u mean the j29 tunnan since the swedish saab based it on the drawings of the ta183
 
Saab 29 Tunnan is an another question.
 
     
    Any plans to introduce Spiteful/Seafang ingame?
 
Only as a limited premium for various events. Even so, with its performance these aircrafts will have BR allowing them fly only with jets... it's just a suggestion but it's possible.
 
 
    for the sake of MM have you considered waiting till you can release american and british tanks at the same time.  If not what sort of plans will you have to prevent everyone sitting in queue for america waiting for a battle?
 
I'm not responsible for tanks

Hello les amis ,
 
tin je suis dégouté : hier soir , j'ai tenté de mettre mon P51-D mustang (BR 5.0 et Tiers 4) dans mon roster d'avions T3 : j'ai déjà 2 B17 qui sont en BR 5.0 , je me suis dit , bah j'ai rien à perdre , je vais remplacer mon A6M2 par le P51 Mustang , et là c'était le drame :
c'est pas compliqué , j 'ai pas arrêté de me prendre des pilotes "knocked out" quasi coup sur coup , j'ai pas compris    
un face à face entre mon P51 et un spitfire a duré 1 sec
idem avec mes B17 , les 2 perdus en quelques secondes avant de pouvoir faire le moindre bombardement : pilot knocked out
Je pige pas car mes équipages , à ce niveau sont relativement bien montés (tous au dessus du niveau 400)
mon BR global va de 4.0 à 5.0.  
 
J'ai donc remis mon A6M2 (BR 3.7 et T2) et là ca allait beaucoup mieux , du coup j'ai moi aussi du mal avec le matchmarking.

   So which line on the British tree will it go on? The "Hawker line" with the Tempest ect but that would mean you go straight from props to a top jet. Or on the "spitfire" line with all the spitfires so it can go after the other jets or even possibly after the Vampire.

Hawker line of course!
 
 
    Do you guys fly your planes and check the matchups before putting them somewhere in the tree?  

Plus or minus. We can fly, we can test and make a suggestion where its place will be.  

   
    Will the Tupolev Tu-95 be in the game?
 
No.
 
     
    Why does the team feel that balancing based on player performance is a superior balance solution than basing it on plane performance?
 
Maybe... Players build their opinion being inside the game. We build our opinion being both inside and outside the game
 
 
    is why we see good pilots getting punished for doing well against korean war time machines?
 
According to matchmaking there no possible way to separate Korean jets from early jets. At least for current system.
 
     
    but can you give us some hints if other nations will be receiving new planes?  
 
Every nation will receive some aircrafts
 
     
     you said there'd be Fokker aircraft. Can we expect the Fokker G1? Which nation(s) will be using Fokkers?
 
Still too early to discuss it.
 
     
    when can we expect the B57 Canberra?
 
very sooooooooooooon
 
    - are there more rocket planes planned?

Not really.
 
     
    When will we be getting night battles and different weather battles OFTEN again? Will there potentially be snow battles and other conditions? Thanks for responding!
 
about different time is a good question, but it doesn't depend on me. Snow battles seem good

   Any chance for late Ilyushin ground attack prototypes (i.e. IL-20/40) ?
 
I don't think return to the question about them in the nearest year
 
    Are you going to fix the influence of the R4M rockets on the Me 262 speed etc?
 
Should be fixed in the nearest minor patch
 
 
    J7W1 Shinden become what rank?
 
4
 
     
    When is the H8K and Ki-44 implementation?

we start modelling of ki-44. I can't say something definite about H8K
 
 
    Will you ever lower the Wellington Mk X BR? The Mk X cant hold its own against planes of its BR
 
Wellington will lose its rank when we will have something like Halifax or Stirling  

     
    Will the implementation of the Mosquito Bomber variant come faster, since its quite similar to the FB Mosquito?

Possible
     
    Is it possible to display Japanese(Kanji) in the game aircraft of Japan?  
 
I should find out
     
    Can we expect a fix for German guns in near future? Especially the MK108s theyre so bad not registering half of the shots and sometimes even if it registers they deal very low damage

Yes
 
    Also are the Flight models of 109s G10, G6 and K4 finished? They feel kinda heavy at high speeds
 
It's a question for ElBarca

 
Pareil, combien de fois l'avion enemi était salement amoché, je le laisse à mon coep qui était la avant pour qu'il le finisse... et l'avion enemi fait demi tour, et me descend, parce que mon allier rechargeait, maintenant c'est pas de quartiers      

moi ça dépend surtout de l'altitude de l'adversaire :
- Un bombardier volant haut auquel je mets un moteur en flammes et qui plonge, je cherche même pas à poursuivre, je l'ai bien endommagé, je l'ai forcé à descendre, je vais pas aller le finir pour perdre une position avantageuse en altitude.
- Un avion volant bas, auquel je crit' le(s) moteur(s), les ailes ou la queue, je le laisse, je sais qu'il ne rentrera pas chez lui, j'ai mieux à foutre que le finir et risquer des "accidents" avec la masse de débiles qui trainent autour.
- Un avion à n'importe quelle altitude s'il est endommagé et que y'a des débiles autour (sous entendu des coéquipiers bas du plafond ), je préfère partir et trouver un truc intelligent à faire plutôt que de rester dans une zone à QI négatif et risquer le TK.

En général s'il y a une action plus intelligente à faire, je laisse l'avion ennemi suffisamment endommagé à un autre sort (genre un allié en difficulté ou un bombardier que tout le monde laisse passer).

    Ju 287 on the release tree, in other words why did you think it should get added?  

It's really interesting a/c. Flyable  aircraft with good bomb load.
 
     
    Can you share something yet on how Japanese D4Y4 will be handled?  
 
We fixed it and removed this a/c
 
     
    Please tell me what is "realistic" about a me 163 fighting f86 f2s in a "realistic" game mode on korea.......
 
Regular battles with matchmaking can't go with the same rules as events go.  

     
    Any chances the F9F-6 will be added?

Yes. But we give first priority to a/c that have in updated Tech Trees
 
 
    why doesn't the British bombers have the 21000 kg bomb, it was used in WWII by the Brits and once and a while the American's would borrow one for a specific job, if we are going to have WWII air battles, why not use all the equipment that was at the military's disposal at the time?  That bomb was known as the base killer, two aircraft and two bombs would devastate any air base beyond belief, my grandfather saw it, he told me about it, he said the bomb was as big as a buick and would destroy anything within a thousand yards of the blast zone.  buildings, planes, bunkers, anything, so why don't we have them?  Thanks
 
Maybe 22 000 lb Grand Slam? If it is, then yes, we will have tall boy and grand slam some day
 
If not, please, provide me with some info about this bomb
 
 
    Reading Your answers regarding Me-262, I am under impression, that You never actually played with this aircraft (in RB at least). I can understand this, as it would be very hard to work hard on this game AND play with every single aicraft. But because of this, You cannot see some really big problems. I would really like You to understand, that current system of adjusting BRs is not good. It would perform good, if every nation had pool of players with similar skill. But for some reasons it is not. For example some people feel guilty for playing in undertiered machines. Or it's because those better players just don't enjoy such easymode and are looking for more challenging planes. Another thing is, that statistics cannot be taken seriously, when MM is inbalanced. Situations, where one team has only few 8.0 planes + 7.7 and 7.3 and another team has a few 8.3 planes are NOT uncommon. In addition 262 is a little special case, because since I joined (little before CBT ended) Me-262 was never tiered correctly. It was always facing much superior enemies. That way, only really good players were (are) able to play with this plane.
 
SB most likely. Just now I've received X55 Rhino  
 
BTW. I can open access and wipe my own accout for playtests on main servers. So I now about this kind of problems
 
 
    Also are You thinking/working on another way to correct BRs?
 
BR and matchmaking is not really my area of activity. But of course i know about them. I just need it
 
 
    Do you know what plane will be behind the Ki-200? In the same time do you mean to move the Sabre into army line after the release of the Kikka?
 
No comments for now
 
     
    Can you talk a little about the bv238 thoughts you guys are struggling with? Is there any problems with its implementation, and if so, what problems?
 
No problems except  it was prototype. Then it's only a premium
 
     
    Is there any chance for the Martin Baker MB 1/3/5 be added to the game after finishing the current planned tech tree?
 
It's possible but not fast

   you see at some engine related modules how much hp or N a engine or compressor update adds, but you dont see how much power you have at all, will this be included in the sheets too? would be nice..
 
I think it's possible
 
     
    Will the mirrors in the cockpits work (
 
I hope they will
 
 
    will the F3D skyknight navy night fighter ever be added as it very similar to the british sea hawk in design which is coming. as they were used in the korean war as night fighters to escort b-29s

Good a/c but no for now. USAAF had many good jets. really. But we can't implement all of them

 
    Are there any plans to re-work the damage from bomber turrets?  Currently turret mounted guns sure feel like they hit 2 to 3 times harder than their fighter mounted models.  B17/B24  fifty caliber guns hit harder than 20mm cannon.

1.43
 
     
    Will we see some "cleaning" of cockpit glass? All the more recently added planes have nice clear cockpits, but some of the older ones are really dirty (e.g. big dirty spot right infront the gunsight of the P63-A5) IRL pilots/crew cleaned the canopys before flyout.
 
question for artist, really
 
     
    Also what about plane modifications like removed headrests on the 109 F and G-2 or galland panzer (armored glass)?
 
Ok, it will be

 
    Do you guys have a back-up plan if you ever decide to give up on your statistical model? What would it take for you guys to switch to manually setting each BR?
    .Does your statistical model consider peer groups?
    Have you considered putting korean war jets and 'inter-war' jets (very early jets) into separate eras? mig 9 vs 262 is a fun match-up, but it never gets to play out because the 262 sees much higher performing planes.
    For example, new era 5 could contain bear cats and other 'super-props' and very first jets. new era 6 could contain mig 15/sabre, and korean era attackers/bombers etc.

As i said earlier I'm not the one who created this model
 
     
    4. Is anyone working on, or planning to work on, implementing projectile inheritance?

Could you be more specific?
 
     
    Is there any possibility of 'realistic controls' (the setting with auto-trim) getting the same recoil cancelling that mouse aim gets in RB? If not, is the FW-190 F-8 with mk103 supposed to have such insane instability?

There will be some changes in recoil soon
 
    Are you going to add F-86F-40 that was manyfactured by Mitsubishi for Japan? and also what bomb load will B-29 get? 9tonnes? or less to balance stuff?  
 
Not for now, I suppose. 9 tonnes for b-29 is quite possible

Dans la lignée du doc proposé par foestus sur la flak, un très étonnant film de propagande sur l'escorte de bombardiers et l'attaque au sol. On y trouve des B17 (oui ils encaissent bien, notamment celui qui vole avec un demi empennage sans que cela ne semble le perturber outre mesure), des P47 P38 P51 et de malheureux Bf 109 , Fw 190 et autres locomotives chars proprement rayés de la surface de la terre.
Notez vers 25/ 30 mn l'altitude du P47 mitraillant des avions au sol : hallucinant !https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idfMaeAk9z4

 
je fais un peu pareil    
Hier soir avec mon Wellington ça à tourné en bataille de forteresse volante, Gunner arrière de H6K Contre mon Gunner avant de Wellington, ça à duré 2 minutes, mes gunner on descendu tout ces Gus   , sauf le paylotte  !
 
C'est assez drôle de voler cote à cote avec un bombardier enemi et laisser les gunner faire    
 
 

Mais paie tes avions à foison    
 
Et pdt ce temps ceux en place y en a pas un de fini

 
   
tu pourrais mettre une liste ?

Ouais enfin le well c'est plus une casemate légère

   
    Will there be any other paper planes since the ME262HG2 was added to the tech tree?

HG2 was built

   do you plan to introduce breaking of guns?

It's possible to implement anyway. <- on en parlait hier de cette feature justement

 
    Is there any consideration for the (far) future of the introduction of the CF-100 Canuck in the British tree?

Can't answer now. It looks intresting.

    You said you want to add each Venom version, so when do you think you can add the land based Venom?

yes, there will be land version

Prochaine session vendredi

Y a pas de liste de faite désolé, y a que des vidéos mais y en a rien que 33 pour les british
 
 

 
Le Wellington est officiellement sur classé pour l'instant en attendant 2 versions plus lourdes de bombardiers british, il devrait redescendre en tiers aussitôt après.

 
ça correspond aux nouveaux arbres déjà postés il y a quelques temps, je vais les remettre en un seul post en rehost

   
 
La je test le lancaster ca change un peu