Reprise du message précédent :

J'ai hate de pouvoir en tout cas mettre la main sur la Barre du Capitaine  

Le combo Tank+Cuirassés+Avions      

Par contre je suis curieux de voir comment va ce faire le matchmaking des Bateaux ... On aura des coques de noix avec des Cuirassés ensemble ?

Et même des Submersible.... ?

Le pied de prend le contrôle du Yamato  

    9 canons de 457 mm (montés en trois tourelles triples)
    12 canons de 155 mm (montés en quatre tourelles triples)
    12 canons anti-aériens de 127 mm (6 tourelles doubles)
    24 canons anti-aériens de 25 mm
    8 canons anti-aériens de 13 mm.

Ouais enfin déjà qu'ils finissent les avions... ca va tourner en melting pot de caca sinon à s'eparpiller....

 
ben ça sera le système de tiers actuel, vedettes lance torpilles et corvettes en T1, destroyers en T2, lights cruisers en T3, heavy cruisers en T4, battleships et porte avions en T5. quelque chose de très proche en tout cas.
 
 
 
ni au début, ni à la fin, jamais il n'y aura de sous marins (sauf si les devs changent d'avis).
 
 
 
je jouerai ni T4, ni T5, au mieux un croiseur léger classe Atlanta pour faire défense aérienne d'une plus grosse unité    

 
c'est ce que j'ai répondu dans le sondage sur le fofo officiel, ils leur restent 75% des avions à ajouter, les maps qui correspondent, ...
 
après y'a GF à FAIRE au complet, et à mi-GF, il sera temps de proposer le NF en test.
 
   

on veut le B29 avec la bombe atomique !
 
   
 

 et toi ça t'arracherai la gueule de dire bonjour quand tu passes dans le jeu !
t'es même pas sur TS gros noob  

Samedi j'ai dit bonjour, et hop tu es parti    
 
TS j'avoue j'y pense jamais

Faut pas le prendre mal
Le nombre de fois où quelqu'un arrive, alors qu'on vient de dire 2 minutes avant "bon c'est ma dernière, après j'y vais"

http://forum.warthunder.com/index. [...] try2991027
 
Dear friends, we have improved the “Join in Progress” system, which allows players to connect to a battle that has already begun. This will somewhat reduce the waiting time and increase the session population in the battles (AB, RB, SB) and events.
 
 
 
The War Thunder Team
 
 
edit : perso j'en vois pas l'intérêt en arcade, par contre en event ça peut faire gagner du temps.

Petit question/réponse rapide d'aujourd'hui :
 
 Posted Today, 05:14 PM
     
    When is B-17's damage model going to be a bit fixed?
 
1.43 I think
     
    Will there ever be aircraft of minor airforces that took part in ww2? For example: Romania, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia... etc...
 
I have plans for these airforces.
     
    Are there plans to add ability to un jam guns that are inside the cockpit? Like the P38.

Well, it should be
 
    Can you share with us how exactly the changes in DMs will happen or what will change?
 
    Will the damage on a plane have a greater effect on its performance? Will cannons/mgs/fires do more damage? Something completly different?
 
I think I will return later to this question. Still tuning this changes

     
    What kinds of Italian planes will we see in the future? If any more? Also. Unsure if it is intended to be this way, but is the S.79B(Twin engine varient) DM bugged? Or just very, very weak? Tail controls go out the instant it gets hit.
 
All possible. Own tech tree and so on.  I will check SM.79B as well as all other aircrafts for 1.43
 
     
    Lassar I have a question about the Canberra. Which if any armament is planned for the plane
 
Better to wait this aircraft on Dev Still a secret
 
     
    Do you think there will be any changes to AI gunners. And their accuracy and damage etc.
 
After we see what changes with DM fixes we will see what we will do with gunners
 
     
    Do you have any plans for German flying boats ?  

Yes
 
    Will there be flyable Ohka? You know, the MXY-7.  
 
We have documentation for this a/c, but still can't say anything definite
 
     
    Do you have any info on the IAR 80/81 family of aircrafts?
 
They will be, but still no word about how and when
     
    Any chance of seeing P-40F or P-40L in game?
 
It's possible, but I don't think it will so soon. There are still 5 P-40s for USAAF
 
     
    There are numerous discussions about how the bigger cannons on planes should somehow make the plane hard to control or slow down once fired : can you possibly explain how the 75mm or other big guns effect the flying characteristics when fired, especially on single seat fighters ?

Will be fixed in 1.43
 
     
    Also: When will we see new A26s? Sooner or later? Will they be in the tree?

We have A-26 in Tech Tree. Not very soon.
 
     
    Perhaps a question that can't be answered right now, but what are the jets planned/considered for the Italians, when/if they get their tree?
 
You will see when we will show Italin Tech Tree
 
     
     Will we ever see a fix for the Komet/Ki-200 landing bug?
 
Possible in 1.43
 
     
    Will we see more complex damage models for planes like we have for tanks? For example disabling the guns or cupolas of a bomber in addition to just the gunners themselves?
 
It's possible
 
     
    - Will G-force limitations ever be made for gunners?
 
Well, we can... Should we?
 
     
    Is the Me 410 B6/R3 going to be fixed? The problem that if it gets a hit or a pinky wing and it's almost completely control-less is a bit annoying
 
Anyway with 1.43 will be fixed i think
 
 
    When will you guys give the PBY the correct armament?
 
    The front 30 cal turret should have 2 MGs instead of one.(On same turret)
 
    If not, I wanna know the reason why the PBY got only 1 front turret MG?
 
In the near future i think.
 
     
    Are the first Generation Jets your limit with this game, or will you eventually (of course in the long run) also add 2nd or even 3rd Gen Jet Aircraft?
 
We are not going to add 2 and higher gen of jets

     
    How close to completion are payloads for aircraft that are currently missing large amounts of their historical payload, like the PBJ, F-84, and F-82?  
 
bombloads for PBJ as well as for B-25s should be reworked. F-84 and F-82 still need some intresting armaments under their wings
 
 
     It is modelled the wood in the planes who have parts of it?
 
Yes, it is

 
    I'm just curious about the choice of the AJ Savage.  Wouldn't the P4M Mercator be a better choice since it has a defensive armament?
 
Or just add as well as AJ Savage. I will see
 
     
    will the american tier 5 bomber be the canberra? (Hope not)
 
For the first time it will
 
   
    How do you intend to make the japanese GF tree? will it reach tier 5?
 
I don't work with GF
 
 
    Will the game have a floatplane tree branch for each nation? everyone loves floatplanes

We want at least
 
 
    About the Fw 190s... they are really fragiles (except the A-8), 2 bullets on a wing and directly unflayable... This issue is know ?
 
The same. Just wait 1.43
 
    For the Fw 190s again, it is possible to add someday the kits R1/R2/R3 for the A-8 ?
 
Most likely
 
    Are you gonna lower the required RP for the first upgrade on jets, because the tier 1 modifications have higher RP requirements than tier 4 modifications, making it a pain to unlock because stock jets are just awful.

It's because there only one modification on 1st rank. We will rebalance this situation of course
 
    are you planning to add the Sabre Bloc 40 to the Japanese line?
 
We are not planning now
 
 
    Are there any Dutch aircraft in development or planned to be in the game?
 
Fokker T.VIII for example
 
 
    Will the He-177 has its max payload?
 
it's possible. I'm waiting docs fror this a/c from our historical consultants
 
 
    -Are Devs going to implement He 162 A-1 (one with 2x30mm Mk 108). Yes it would cause stability problems and fuselage would sometimes break but Gaijin said we won't have such things happening. Yak 9k's engine doesn't break when firing a lot of shots.
 
No. Just because stability problems and fuselage would sometimes break. Yak-9K had passed all test at least

 
    Have you decided in which aircraft line from the Japanese tech tree to put the upcoming Nakajima Kikka?
 
Moreover I know where should be every aircraft in tech tree.
 
     
    I suppose that planed in "ASAP Japan tree" J2M will have standard armament but what about this few existing specimens with two Type 5 Mod 1 30 mm cannons instead of four 20 mm cannons? Should we also expect them as normal or premium planes?
 
As soon as I will have all docs for J2M we will see what models we will make for War Thunder

 
    Why does it feel like that .50 cals do more damage than cannon shells such as e.g. Hispano 20mm, 151 20mm, 30 mm (any nation)? Is it the fault of my connection, the damage model or the model and "damage" of the bullet itself; or is it actually weaker than the 20, 30 mm but I never notice it?
 
Well, there are some problems with high caliber cannons, but don't think there is a problem with 20mm. Anyway it will be checked
 
 
    Which version of the Ju287 are you building up?

too early for answering
 
 
    We will get 3 variant of R2Y2 ? And if it's only one, which  one?

it will be surprise

    Can we have the confirmation if the J7w1 will not be a premium?

It won't be a premium
 
 
    First of all will Do-335 ever appear in patch 1.43?  
 
Later, of course
 
 
    will you ever remove the copy paste german sabre?
 
No, Germans hadn't anything to fight against sabres and migs
 
 
    There was a plan about lowering Me 262s BR to meet Bearcats and early, post WW2 jets, like Yak-15, Yak-17, P-80, Meteors.
 
I understand you, but statistic for this aircrafts show things that could be surprising. For example, Me.262 is feeling himself on its BR.
 
 
        Along with the Kikka jet, will you also include the Karyu?
 
We will see. Not for the nearest future
 
         For RB/SB will you implement a historical type of MM (ie Have planes that fought in 1943 battle against other planes that fought in 1943
 
Events is better solution for it, i think.
 
     
    Will planes that had similar size and payload to B29 also be added to other trees? A soviet Tu4, the G10N Fujikama (That one may be hard) German Me 264 Amerikabomber and the Avro Shackleton for Britain
 
Tu-4 will be. G10N is not acceptable just because it's pure paper with fantastic tech data.  He.177 could carry up to 6000 kg against 3000 kg for me.264. Shacleton is worse than Lancaster and Linkoln

     
    What armament will DO-335 have?
 
To early for answering

     
    Will the Griffon Spitfires ever get higher boost/150 octane?
 
No, whe are not planning. Should we?
 
     
    Will there be some loadout changes for the F6F-3 at the introduction of the F6F-5?  
 
Yes, I think
 
 
    How many types Is there a Japanese aircraft of the implementation plan in the 1.43 update?  
    And Is there a J7W1 Shinden among them?
 
There are about  7 units

     
    Any ETA on when the P-38G will get its bomb pylons?  
 
everything after we rework p-38 series
 
     
    will we see the IL-28 in 1.43?
 
Very possible
 
     
     is there a possibility of the CA-27 Sabre being added?
 
There will be no sabres for British Tech Tree
 

We can already find R2Y2 models in cdk, but I see there three variants of it (R2Y2 Kai, v1 and v2). Does it mean we will get all three versions of it - R2Y2, R2Y2 Kai I and Kai II ?  
 
You will see
   
 
    Will we see the BV238?  
 
Maybe
     
        Lassar, you mentioned late last year about the XP38G (that never existed), that you guys were going to re-designated the XP38G in roughly half a year, its now July so does that mean we will see the new Version of the Premium P38 soon ? or is there a delay ? and do you guys know what version you have picked to re-designated the aircraft as ? some have mentioned a P38K as a suggestion

We will rework P-38 series. As for XP-38G we will change it for better p-38 in the same time, i think
 
    With the apparent incoming Pre production F.1 Hunter on its way in the future. Has it been decided which one will be used as some didn't have Airbreaks, while others did, and some didn't have flying tails/powered ailerons while other ones did have them added. Will we be seeing the one with an airbreak, flying tail and powered ailerons or without?
 
Too early to answer
 
 
    Are there any definitive long-term plans for adding new planes?
 
British Naval aircrafts for example. We are making them, but will implement together later.
 
 
     If so, which planes are very likely to appear in next big patch?
 
We will show them step by step in dev blog
 
     
    How is the map making going on? Will there be new maps added in close future?
 
There will be at least one new aircraft map in 1.43
 
     
    Any concrete plans on changing the matchmaking?
 
Not working with matchmaking directly

     
    Second question: Did you have ideas for more Japanese jets? (maybe other JASDF planes like the F-40 or the Vampire. or other paper plane like the Ki-201, J7W2 and others)
 
For the nearest future we are not planning new japanese jets
     
    When we will see early version of Bf 109 ?
 
1.45 possible
 
  The Lancaster has been lacking proper bombloads and their full defensive armament options for so long now.
 
    Can we expect a fix to this plane soon?

Well, ust now we a reworking Lancaster model and I hope we will add new bombloads for it.  
But i'm not sure if we will make it till 1.43. Most likely till 1.45
 
     
    First: Fw 190 C-1 - When, Lassar, wheeeen?!
 
1.45-1.47 possible
 
     
    he G8N1 has the Ho-103 12,7mm guns ingame, but it had MG 131. It's even in the description of the plane. Will it be fixed with the next patch?
 
yes
 
     
     Regarding DMs. Rumors say, that radial engines were kinda robust and could still work when damaged. But they just turn black and smoke into your face like inline engines, after slight damage (indicator is pink, as example). What are reasons for that?
 
I know the way to fix it. 1.43
 
     
    (Topic which was often talked about in the japanese subforum) The Kitsuka was powered by Ne-20s during her first flights. I guess the plane will come with these engines, however, is it maybe possible to see the logical upgrades for it (unlockable or uptiered Kitsuka "Ko / Otsu" (Ne-130 and maybe Ne-330).
 
You will see
 
     
    The A6M7 is in the ASAP tree, but not the A6M6. Is there a specific reason for that?  

Nothng specific.As I said earlier. If we hadn't a/c in Tech Tree ther is still a chance for its appearance in the game
 
     
    -Any chance the DO's will get airbrakes?
 
it's possible
 
   
    any chance we might see the P-38K-1-LO sometime in the future?
 
Little chance for now

TL;DR

 
 
ça veut dire quoi ça aufaite le TL;DR        

too long; didn't read

prochaine IRL, JTLLB

Je te lèche la bite?
 
Coquin va!

 
Je Te Latte Les Boules ... mais je savais que j'arriverai à trouver un pervers pour répondre à côté  

 
C'est avant le renforcement de sa défense anti-aérienne fin 1943 ça. Sans parler du second.
Mais les obus de 25mm étaient trop lent pour faire de l'AAA. Bref c'était de la merde.  

 
ça me rappelle un samedi soir

Doc sur le mur de l'atlantique et les bombardements alliés dur F5 naoh

Bon ça cause surtout bateaux en fait

nouvelle vague de Q/R aujourd'hui avec les devs, comme précédement, ceux qui sont trop flemmards pour lire iront se faire foutre    

 
Heinnnn... je pensao à une blague de geek genre HTML ect    
 
 
j'ai trop cherché loin  

Petite question de n00b
 
Là actuellement j'ai débloqué un bombardier T2 du côté américain, j'ai quasiment tout débloqué en T1.  
Par contre, comment ça marche pour se retrouver dans les parties T2 ? Dès qu'un véhicule T2 est sélectionné ça fait passer en T2 ou c'est un système de point ?
 
Je ne risque pas de me faire démonter la boite à benco si j'ai qu'un avion T2 parmi toute ma liste ? L'xp avance plus vite si je suis en partie T2 ?

 
 
Chaque avion à un Battleranking, qui UP avec les modif que tu lui fourres. Le jeux prend tes trois avions au plus haut BR et fait la moyenne !  
 
plus tu montes en tier, plus tu gagnes d'xp, mais plus il faut de point.... Bref en gros plus tu montes en tier plus c'est long...
 
Regarde le BR de tes avions (dans les infos de ton Zing), et essaye de faire un mélange homogène, sinon, éffectivement tu va te faire tasser le burito    
 
ça dépend surtout des nations, le BR des allemand est bien trop haut, celui des JAPS un peu bas, celui des amerloques à revoir, et les Russe je pense que ça va à peu pret  

Ah merde j'ignorais cela merci pour la précision.  
Je vais de suite me documenter sur le battleranking

   2nd question: What will the bomb load of the B-29 be? I have seen the bomb loads for it in the CDK editor but will the bomb loads there actually be in-game?

Historically based of course For now what can you see in CDK isn't something valuable
 
    for example FW 190 A5 had 17 different kits with 30mm and 20mm pods or torpedos (and also A8)
 
for torpedo Fw.190 had reworked rear landing gear by the way
 
    do you plan to add any historical loadout to every plane sooner or later, or do you plan to skip some on purpose for balancing reason?
 
Yes, we do plan to add most of historical loadouts. Not all, but...
 
     Is there a reason spitfires don't have the benefit of their universal wings allowing different load outs of weapons?
 
Different wings = different plane. It's fact.
 
     Is the current wing tearing on the meteors intentional/accurate or is it a bug?
 
This question is closer to FM, that DM.
 
     
    Regarding FM and DM - what level of fidelity is planned to be developed in the future? I mean, can we look forward to see something like e.g. Il-2 1946 in the end?
 
Don't really understand what do you mean.

    I love bombers and while fighters saw some BR changes from time to time, nearly none of the bombers ever got balanced. especially lancaster and the late wellington for example are way too high and easy victims for any fighters in that BR..
    Will there be some bomber rebalance in future? especially since you work on the DM I guess they will be (because every fighter guy wants that) even easier to kill in future..
     
 
This situation is curious. From one side we can lower BR for Lancaster for example. (But IRL this bomber was weak against interceptors). Then We will add maximum loadouts for this bomber and i'm sure we will have to give higher BR for this bomber again just due to its statistics
 
    Is there any possibilty that the time limit of the game will be revisited in the future? And here I'm not asking about the usually discussed post-1953 time limit but about the possibilty to add planes from the 20's (not counting the special 2-OP) to the game.
 
For now we are limited by Spanis Civil War and don't see for now any reason to touch earlier years
 
    It is possible to make a plane explode ingame via shooting at it (fighter)
 
    Does that ingame explosion affect other planes (similar to the WrGr 21 does right now)?
 
Yes it possible. And Yes, it does if other planes will be close enough
 
     
    A bit related: Can the bombload of bombers set of with a AP hit?
 
No, it can't for now. We discussed this question during CBT and with players too. But we still gave no proofs it could be. Moreover bombs had own system preventing detonation till bomb drop
 
 

   Still want a little more precise answer of my question about the place where the Nakajima Kikka will be put.  
 
You will see after open test on Dev server
 
    Which are the chances of seeing guided bombs in the game?
 
     Such as the "fritx x" bomb,  henschel Hs 293 and their counterparts from american side for example.
 
Well, I have idea about how implement them, but still they have uncertain gameplay aspect
 
     
    It's still in your list, that AP and HE bombs behave differently? (I'm talking about mostly about japanese bombs)
 
Currently we are working about improving AP mechanics for AP bombs and rockets
 
    One last question, that I don't really know if you could answer them is that, something I like in the game, is the information tab that the planes and tanks have, but not all of the tanks and planes have this information available, it just say, look at the wiki of warthunder for more information. Are there any planes to fill the information tab of all planes and tanks or is something that is delayed for the moment?
     
At least I will be able to ask about it
 
    Are there any plans to fix the artificial horizon on German planes

I haven't known about this problem. If there were issues on bug-tracker then our artist should know about it.
 
     
    Is it true you will not add RATO units to a single nation (EVEN preliminary) because it's not worth it for just one nation or is considered unfair?
 
Like this one? Why not? We are about to add them, but after 1.43. Mechanics for them we have now
 
    Also, is ramming ground targets removed to encourage better gameplay or is it temporary, due to lack of appropriate DM's for ramming?
 
more likely they will be reworked.
 
 
    Are there plans for Joystick-only and/or Cockpit-only (in the case of the latter, perhaps leaving out the planes without cockpits or bombers in general, in) AB or RB events?
 
We should add this kind of events of course
 
   
    Finally, when should we expect the F3F, as well as other important biplanes? What BR should we expect?
 
after 1.45 I think

    1) According to this suggestion, P-51 should have another 200 rounds of ammunition, when can we expect it to be implemented?
 
1.43 I think.

C'est quoi "DM" et "FM" ?

 
flying model, damage model

 
Ca c'est ton avis perso
 

2) According to some, G.50 should have 300 rounds per gun, not in total. Is this true?
 
I have an issue on Bug-tracker. I will see. It's possible.
 
 
    example PTAB bombs for il-2(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PTAB), anti bomber bombs for japanese planes (http://www.lonesentr...log/tag/tactics), american bat bombs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_bomb), napalm for jets , fritz-x for germany(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_X)etc...
 
    Also naval mines and parachuted bombs could be interesting.
 
PTAB will be ingame. About others can't say now. Every special bomb should be discussed separately

 
 
    Question 2: Is the Hs 123 coming any time soon?
 
Not soon unfortunately
 
     
    Question 3: Will the Mig-3 be getting the option to equip rockets?  
 
Late version will get rockets
 
 
     How much time it usually takes to create rdy for testing Damage Model of a plane.

Well, for now not too much. For now I have many airplanes tuned with different accuracy. So the problem is to find Tech description for aircraft's construction, find differences with other aircraft, documented problems and events with  its durability properties and so on. So I'm usually able to get first draft in 3 hours if I have enough references. Then there are several test iterations.  

     
     Is there major difference in time for creating DM of fighter or bomber?
 
no difference there
 
     
    . How much time it took to fix B17 disaster and why are U stalling with the fix implementation?
 
Because changing common setting for DM. It's for every a/c. B-17 just showed problem in the most brightest way.
 
 
    whats your most anticipated aircraft?
 
Fiat G.55
 
 
    Not sure if you can answer this, but a friend wanted me to put this out there. He says the Wellington models are too weak compared to how much damage they can take realistically, or how much stress their flight models could take realistically.
 
We will return to this problem after 1.43. If it will continue to exist
 
     
    And? What's wrong with adding He 162 A-1? You should know that mechanical problems is not modeled in the game, so I don't see any problem with He 162 A-1 considering that German would use another jet with more powerful cannons to deal with spam of B17s and B24s, IMO.  
 
Yak-9K had powerful muzzle brake (reduce about 85% of shot energy)
 
    Since you confirmed Hawker Hunter F.1 early production model, which one that has airbrakes, powered tail or powered controls? It's important to know, since first 11 pre production model didn't have those. Only 12th to 20th has air brakes and other controls that were crucial in high speed turning.
 
without airbrakes
 
    Any plans to update certain aircraft guns sounds? For example, look at the German 13mm MG - sounds like peas falling into a frying pan...
 
We are always working on sound effects. But I don't know what is with german 13mm MG.
 
 
    Is there any possibility to implement appealing de-/reflector sights? Like changes between Daylight and Nightvisiors or settings for higher brightness and dim. Also dynamical reticle, instead of the static/immovables sight.
 
I think it is possible
 
 
    Will we see prototypes ingame, which were just cancelled because begin of the jet age or other minor reason? I mean really successful and outstanding prototypes.
 
Prototypes is a question of need. Every a/c should be discussed in separate thread.
 
     
    Is a he-111 model rework planned?  
 
I'm not sure it will be soon
 
     
    Are there any plans for the B-29 in the near future?  
 
Theretically it is possible. But after 1.45 anyway
 
     
    Do you plan on making night battles more common? If so, will lights (headlights and taillights for ground vehicles, landing lights and navigation lights for aircraft) on vehicles become operable?
 
Not for now. There are some mechanics to implement before we will be able to return to this question
 
     
    is there a chance for the He-111E series from the spanish civil war with the seperate cockpit to be included in the warthunder project?
 
After all aircrafts in tech tree updates i think we will see
 
     
    the yak-2 / yak-4 bombers?
 
Possible some day. But i can't say anything certain

 
toutafé  

 
Y'a pas l'info sur wikipédia mais de souvenir je crois que le Yamato n'a pas descendu plus d'une dizaine d'avions sur les 386 qui l'attaquaient.
Il a été achevé par un TBF-3 qui est quand même pas un super avion.
 
De toute façon les très gros bateau c'est prestigieux dans les défilés militaires, ça fait fantasmer tout le monde, mais sur le terrain ça a toujours été de la merde (sauf peut-être pour des tactiques spécifiques genre coup de Trafalgar).
 

 
ben les gros bateaux n'ont eu du "succès" que contre les cibles terrestres à partir du moment où il y avait couverture aérienne, ça veut tout dire sur leur intérêt  

Tu vas même très vite rencontrer des avions T3, voire même T4, vu que le matchmaking prends aussi en compte tes résultats...

Bon je me remets aux allemands, que j'avais commencé au tout début du jeu avant de passer sur les russes, et c'est la que je me rends compte que les canons russes c'est vraiment de la merde, ou alors les canons allemands sont surpuissants au choix, je sais pas si historiquement la différence était si flagrante.
 
C'est simple, en allemand chaque fois que ca touche ca crit quasiment à chaque fois, ce qui n'est pas du tout le cas des russes, en russe les ShvaK sont corrects mais alors le reste comparé aux allemands

 
Ah je me posais la question justement, au début je faisais des très bons scores puis moins, puis tout pourris, et la c'est correct

       Will the Russian Tech Tree see any future Jet Fighter / Interceptors (eg: MiG-19) now that it is likely the U.K. tree will receive a pre-production Hawker Hunter F.1? Both the examples above were both developed and flown before the time limit, with production beginning very soon after (as-is the same with the Hawker Hunter).
        Will the MiG-17 be added to the game in future?

We are not going to implement even MiG-17. We don't see any need in it for now
 
        Is there any possibility or plans by Development to add limited-time experimental Aircraft, such as the Tu-1 and so on?
 
Possibility always exists, but tu-1 don't seem to be a good interceptor even in game reality. At least every prototype should be discussed
 
 
    Air Force tree would go to complete from which country?
    And what time, to develop plans to complete the Air Force tree?

There will be at least Italian Tech Tree in the future.  
 
Hard to say. Last Tech tree updates show to players what aircrafts left to fulfill every country. But there are still to many aircrafts not on board
 
     
    Now, to the question. Do you personally think that the 262 is tiered correctly? Do you think it's fine that it fights sabres?  
 
 I will try to answer. I think that in game reality with its limitation it has right tier. Time limits, battle area limits, start at the same conditions, kill'em'all to win, etc. This all can provide unpredictable results. Even so different with our expectations
 
     
    Short question about Boulton Paul Defiant
 
I'm still sure this a/c will have specific gameplay. Maybe even unplayable
 
   
    Is there going to be any limited time planes like La-174?
 
Why? It's more fair than 5th Rank premiums if you ask me
 
     
    have the devs chosen between the Hunter  
 
Hunter F.1
 
 
    Will we be seeing more British bombers in the upcoming patches? The British bomber line needs some non-wellington love :l
 
I want sunderland ASAP at least

 
la correction appliquée en fonction du "level" du joueur est de +1/-1 au BR lors du lancement d'une partie en fonction des résultats obtenu avec chaque avion du deck. autant dire que le  +1/-1 sur 5 avions c'est du théorique.