Reprise du message précédent :
Il me semble avoir lu lors des premières annonces sur le mustang que nous pourrons échanger notre Aurora contre un Mustang. C'est déjà possible ? Conserve t'on la LTI ?

Du coup à voir si je garde mon pledge 325a puisque j'ai le pack mustang maintenant.

 
faut attendre les cross upgrade pour ça, donc que le mustang soit dans l'ac

fais gaffe a ton acces alpha, tu vas le perdre du coup

perso, j'ai rien de particulier (pas de lti, alpha ou autre)

la mozaic de toutes les organizations, taille assez énorme... https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ [...] Mosaic.png
 
pour info on y est ^^
 
sinon on devrait avoir bientot des infos sur le fps

 
 
avec notre logo on va passer pour les clowns de l espace

Trouvé !

J-8 pour la présentation du gameplay FPS

...... Mois- 3 ou 4 pour le module

Mois -45 avant le module multi crew ! (pardon!)

Le petit nonox avec son Aurora est attendu sur le pont d'envol n°42, je répète, le petit nonox est attendu ...

Pas la première fois où je me dis que le choix des typos n'est pas vraiment bien inspiré...
Lisibilité perfectible.

Ton phoenix a besoins de canonniers !
 
Je suis sur qu'il a hâte de tout nonoxer

Quasiment toute les interfaces HUD moderne de jeux vidéos. Magnifique mais 100 fois moins lisible que le povre bloc note Windows  

Sans demander à ce que cela soit parfait, les premiers "render target" concernant les huds était bien plus sympa. A voir si cela va evoluer dans le bon sens.

ils avaient pas dis que les hud serait finalement moddable ?

 
je suis déception a fond, ma CG n'est pas supporté ça crash a chaque essai de lancement  

Merdouille .... bon ben, on attendra que tu changes de CG alors

 
ce qui ne devrait pas trop tarder

reddit live en cours a propos du FPS : http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comme [...] _anything/
 
What games are you drawing mechanical inspiration from?
A mixture of Counter-Strike, Rainbow Six, Arma, Delta Force, Kill Zone
   
Will you be able to damage a ships systems from the inside intentionally or non-intentionally?

Absolutely
   
Will the death of a spaceman mechanic be addressed in fps gameplay itself, making the players inherently more cautious? For instance, some games allow characters to heal automatically, while others allow med kits to restore all health. Will there be more realistic approaches? Med kits only restoring to a certain point (80%) or only taking effect temporarily (boosting health for 5 minutes) or minor gunshots tearing holes in space suits so the vacuum of space can kill?
You are absolutely correct on all points, maybe not the tearing holes in space suits part but on other systems yes. the mechanics are built to discourage players from going ballistic and be very cautious while playing.
 
When can we expect to see an alpha version of the FPS module released?
early next year!
 
Can you provide an example of the kind of gameplay experience you're looking for? Maybe a description of what an encounter between two players might be like in terms of lethality, weapons used, moves used, length of play, etc?

there are so many. lets just pull one randomly from the sky.
A Persistent Universe experience. I'm a stealthy, solo player. I find a wrecked ship, i know scavengers will be around soon. I find a crate and put myself in it. I let the scavengers take the crate and put me in their ship. When i'm on their ship, some time later, i get out of the crate. Very quietly, i rummage around and find some goodies i like. I steal those... now i can either - A) Jump out the airlock and call a ride or B) go to their engine room and self destruct their ship or C) quietly hunt and execute the entire staff and take their ship.... or Z) they could have scanned the crate properly before loading it, blasted it with their ship and me with it....
   
 
Can we expect more tactical gameplay (Rainbow Six, etc) or more like run and gun (call of duty)?

Absolutely, the core of the FPS mechanics is very tactical
 
What directions has Chris Roberts given you regarding the visual style and mechanics of FPS?

He is very hands on and quick to say what he does and doesnt like! It was very interesting because he pushed us creatively and made us get out of our comfort zones, which allowed us to truly excel as developers.
 
What kind of camera settings will you allow for the FPS part (first person, third person)?
only first person as third person breaks tactic balance too much.
 
 
c'est pas fini et j'ai asp tout quoté

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcitize [...] responses/

FPS TEAM

pour en savoir plus sur le dev, leur façon de faire pour rendre un vaisseau jouable.
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ [...] p-Pipeline

ps : vous noterez les "CR approval"

d'ailleurs :

Ship Name Next Stage
315p Flight Ready
325a Complete
890 Jump Hangar Ready
Aurora CL Flight Ready
Aurora ES Flight Ready
Aurora LN Flight Ready
Aurora LX Flight Ready
Avenger Flight Ready
Avenger Variant 1 Concept Ready
Avenger Variant 2 Concept Ready
Avenger Variant 3 Concept Ready
Banu Merchantman Concept Ready
Carrack Concept Ready
Caterpillar Concept Ready
Reclaimer Concept Ready
Constellation Andromeda Flight Ready
Constellation Aquila Flight Ready
Constellation Taurus Flight Ready
Constellation Phoenix Flight Ready
Cutlass Black Flight Ready
Cutlass Blue Flight Ready
Cutlass Red Flight Ready
Freelancer Flight Ready
Freelancer DUR Flight Ready
Freelancer MAX Flight Ready
Freelancer MIS Flight Ready
Gladiator Hangar Ready
Gladius Hangar Ready
Herald Concept Ready
Hornet F7C-M Flight Ready
Hornet F7C-R Flight Ready
Hornet F7C-S Flight Ready
Idris M Hangar Ready
Idris P Hangar Ready
Manticore Concept Ready  
Mustang Hangar Ready
Mustang Beta Hangar Ready
Mustang Delta Hangar Ready
Mustang Gamma Hangar Ready
Mustang Omega Flight Ready
New Corvette Concept Ready    
Hull C Concept Ready
P52 Merlin Hangar Ready
Redeemer Hangar Ready
Retaliator Hangar Ready
Starfarer Concept Ready
Vanduul Glaive Flight Ready
Vanduul Scythe Flight Ready
Xi’an Scout Hangar Ready
Xi’an Volper Concept Ready  

A voir dans combien de temps on verra le mustang, retaliator et 890 ds le hangar

Je veux mon aurora ln

Voila comment le tableau doit etre compris Kenrio  
 
NOM DU VAISSEAU           ETAPE ACTUELLE         PROCHAINE ÉTAPE
315p                                   Paré pour le Hangar         Apte au vol
325a                                   Terminé                         Terminé
890 Jump                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Aurora CL                           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Aurora ES                           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Aurora LN                           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Aurora LX                           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Avenger                           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Avenger – Variante #1           Concept                         Concept prêt
Avenger – Variante #3           Concept                         Concept prêt
Avenger – Variante #2           Concept                         Concept prêt
Merchantman Banu           Concept                         Concept prêt
Carrack                           Concept                         Concept prêt
Caterpillar                           Concept                         Concept prêt
Reclaimer                           Concept                         Concept prêt
Constellation Andromeda   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Constellation Aquila           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Constellation Taurus           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Constellation Phoenix           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Cutlass Black                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Cutlass Blue                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Cutlass Red                           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Freelancer                           Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Freelancer DUR                     Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Freelancer MAX                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Freelancer MIS                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Gladiator                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Gladius                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Herald                           Concept                         Concept prêt
Hornet F7C-M                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Hornet F7C-R                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Hornet F7C-S                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Idris M                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Idris P                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Manticore                           Concept                         Concept prêt
Mustang                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Mustang Beta                   Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Mustang Delta                   Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Mustang Gamma                   Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Mustang Omega                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
New Corvette                   Concept                         Concept prêt
Hull C                           Concept                         Concept prêt
P52 Merlin                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Redeemer                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Retaliator                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Starfarer                           Concept                         Concept prêt
Vanduul Glaive                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Vanduul Scythe                   Paré pour le hangar         Apte au vol
Xi’an Scout                           Concept prêt                 Paré pour le hangar
Xi’an Volper                   Concept                         Concept prêt

 
non mais j'avais compris mais c'est surtout qu' ils viennent d’annoncer 3 vaisseaux inconnus ^^

Salut Bonjour !
 
J'ai pris une clé sans trop savoir ce que je faisais avec une nouvelle carte amd.
Maintenant que c'est téléchargé, il va falloir que j'essaie de comprendre

Pour ma part je suis tres "fan" de ce jeu.
J'espert qu'on auras rapidement des bonnes petites nouveautés
 
J'attend deja le MULTI CREW (en soit déjà ça ce sera le pied ..) même si au début ça risque d’être "bidon" du genre "tu invite des gens dans ton vaisceau et ils sont téléportés" (maintenant il se peu que je me trompe et que l'on puisse carrément les TP dans le hangars et qu’après ils embarquent avec nous mais ça m'étonnerait, car il n'y a pas encore l'univers persistant, (donc pas de décollage))
 
Ceci dit ça devrait etre fun  
 
D'ailleurs si des gens cherchent des place à ce moment pour embarqué dans un phoenix, je pourrais en faire venir hihi  
 
Si non les vaisseaux que j’attends a tout prix .. :
- Le retaliator : c'est simple des qu'il arrive je me le prend (il sera entre 250$ et 300$ du moins pour la version civile (CAD, pas celle avec les bombes anti IDRISS, mais celle avec des tourelles etc)
- Le redeemer : car je le trouve jolis
 
EDIT: pour ceux que ça interesse, vous trouverez sur cette page un pdf de 165 pages assez interessent (en anglais), https://forums.robertsspaceindustri [...] ar-citizen

Traduction de l'article d’ou est extrait la liste de vaisseau.
http://www.starcitizen.fr/2014/10/ [...] r-citizen/
On peut notamment constater que CR s'implique dans chaque étape importante de conception !
Je me demande si c'est généralement de rigueur dans les autres boites ce genre d'implication de la par du big boss.

Q&R du 890
 
(j'ai pas trouvé les balises pour citer )
 
Je permet de réciter ce que j'ai déjà post sur jol:
 
 Hey guys! I’m sorry for the delayed response on this; it’s not that the 890 is less important than the Cutlass, it’s just at a much earlier stage in development… so where Travis and I can open up a Cutlass and check out how the guts work, the 890 remains much more theoretical. But I will do the best I can with these questions!
 
1) How accurate are the schematics from the brochure supposed to be?
 
The schematics (which are my favorite part of the 890 brochure) are accurate in so far as everything listed on them will be included in the finished ship and it will be roughly in that area. The next step for the 890 Jump (do you guys prefer Jump or JUMP?) is that we will build the model itself in the CryEngine. While that happens, we whitebox everything… and that’s the step in the process where we discover and correct a lot of what you’re identifying about in this thread. Along the lines of ‘oh, the room doesn’t fit here, we need to make the ship bigger, oh this room won’t fit here, we have to move it down a level’ and so on. The schematics are, quite literally, our schematics in that respect
 
1a) Is the hangar really large enough to fit two 85X size ships? [See question 6C as well]
 
Yes; at least: that is the design goal. If we get to whiteboxing and two ships don’t fit, we can expand the length of the hangar as needed.
 
1b) What is all the empty space behind the cargo loader?
 
That is the cargo hold.
 
1c) Does the central elevator not reach the top floor? Is this considered wheelchair accessible?
 
The elevator does reach the top floor; think of it as being a circular pedestal that carries you up… so the top of the shaft is the bottom deck it reaches. If you look at the ‘above’ blueprint, you can see it on the top deck.
 
1d) Is there just a single bathroom in the ship, or will the individual guest bedrooms as well as the crew area have facilities as well?
 
There will be facilities in each of the guest rooms.
 
1e) Is the 890 Jump ship size correct in the current holoviewer, or the 85X? (or neither?) Currently if the 85X is scaled correctly the 890 Jump would only be about 80 meters in length:
 
Neither; the Holoviewer is the older concept model. We will swap it out on the website with the larger ship once we’ve built it as a CryEngine asset.
 
2) Is the Size 6 max power supply - the same size found on most Constellations, which are far smaller, and which the Reclaimer has two of - going to be adequate to power all the amenities on this ship?
*UPDATE* - based on concept art in the subscribers den, the reactor room may have two power plants (R1 and R2 on different panels of the reactor mechanism).
3) Is the Size 6 max shield - the same size found on the Constellations, which are far smaller, and smaller than the Reclaimer's size 7 - going to be sufficient to protect such a large target?
4) Are the six TR5 main thrusters - the same number / size as the Reclaimer, which was described as 'lumbering' in an episode of Reverse the Verse - going to be able to provide enough speed for this ship?
 
The short answer for these is yes, the components do work the way we’re imagining them to (and that while they’re often the same class as other ships, they’re different sizes and/or top-of-the-line versions of things that size.)
The longer answer is that you can expect to see a change in ship components in the near future, with a clear difference between standard and capital-class components (as we build larger and larger ships, we realize the current system doesn’t give us enough room to expand to cover things like Bengal engines.)
 
4a) Where does CIG feel like this ship should fall in terms of max speed, compared to the other ships? Faster / slower than... a Constellation? Retaliator? Cutlass? 300i? etc
 
This is a surprisingly difficult question, given that the ships are modular in this respect; but from the stock ships, the 890 Jump should be around the same speed as the Retaliator. (With the design concept being: it should be fast for a capital ship, but slow compared to single-seaters.)
 
5) What is the difference between having Class 3 missile hardpoints, which a lot of ships have, and the Class 4 turrets that the 890 Jump has which are equipped with missiles? Is there some targeting advantage or other to having missiles on a turret like that?
 
A Class 3 missile hardpoint is fixed-forward, while a Class 4 turret is… well, turreted. So it can rotate around to achieve lock from different angles.
 
5a) Can those missiles be swapped for other types of weapons on those same turrets? Can other ships mount missiles in place of guns on Class 4 turrets?
 
Yes to both.
 
6) How does the 85X shuttle (or any other ship in the hangar bay) deploy from the 890 Jump?
 
The original plan was to have it ‘drop’ like a bomb, although now that the ship has been resized we’re considering other options.
 
 
6a) Is the impression that the hangar opens on the bottom correct? It seems like this could cause problems if any more than one ship were in the bay at a time, or if any items were left sitting on the bay floor by accident.
6b) Has a horizontal entrance to the hangar been considered, instead of vertical? There appears to be plenty of space between the engines in the back to allow something like that, if the hangar bay were relocated:
 
See above.
 
6c) Regardless of location, is there a rough idea of what size & number of ships the 890 Jump "should" be able to fit? The holoviewer currently shows one 85X, the M50 has been mentioned as being able to fit, and the schematic shows two 85X. Origin's premiere individual spacecraft, the 300i series, seems like it would be something Origin would want to allow their ship owners to use...
 
A pair of 85X’s is the design plan; as for what else might fit in there, we’ll defer until the actual model is build and we can see what fits!
 
7a) What are the number and type of hard-points available? Some information seems to indicate that there are two class 5, three class 4 (two of them equipped with missile launchers in place of guns), and two class 9. The ship specs page appears to only lists one class 9 hard-point though ("1x 2x Kodiak" ), and the landing page for the ship and the CitizenCon presentation indicate as many as nine total weapon systems - rather than seven in the current specs. Can you clarify the correct loadout?
 
There are seven hardpoints: 3x Size 4, 2x Size 5, 2x Class 9
 
The ship specs page is wrong, two Class 9 hardpoints and not one.
 
I’m thinking the landing page for the ship is counting multiple guns on a single turret hardpoint.
 
7b) Where is the location of the second Class 5 turret? One can be seen on the bottom-forward section of the ship, with a tube leading to it (visible on Deck 3), but the second doesn't seem to be visible anywhere. It looks like it may be near the bridge from the Deck 2 layout, but there is no sign of a turret control seat.
 
I believe this is an upper rear turret; it may not be reflected on the current art.
 
7c) Will the missiles be reloadable during combat like the Freelancer MIS or Idris, or will they require landing to re-arm?
 
They will be reloadable, one of the benefits of larger ships with internal magazines!
Citation:
8a) Where is the location of the secondary "battle" bridge? Is it present with the main bridge, or something that can be swapped in place of it?
 
*UPDATE* - based on early concept art in the subscribers den, it looks like the plan was to have a secondary bridge in the nose of the ship. That is missing from later schematics, though.
 
Your update is correct, it looks like they didn’t include it in the schematics. We’ll make sure it’s highlighted in the next version!
 
8b) Are the guest bathrooms shown on the schematic the same as the on board spa?
 
No.
 
8c) Are the kitchen/bar facilities next to the crew sleeping quarters for the crew? Are there also some for the guests in the main atrium?
 
The kitchen is for the whole ship, but there’s a separate dining area for passengers.
 
8d) Do the master and guest suites all have windows / views?
 
That’s the goal, although it may change as we tweak the internal layout. At least SOME of them will
 
8e) Is there a plan for a med bay on the 890 Jump? Perhaps as an option in place of another room (one of the suites)?
 
Not something we’d considered for this one, but it’s certainly something that I’ll pass along!
 
9) Related to cargo hold:
9a) Can rovers be stored in the cargo Bay or does the cargo loader prohibit this?
 
As long as they fit on the cargo loader, you should be able to carry them. This is another one of those ‘we’ll measure it when it’s in the engine’ questions.
 
9b) Is the cargo bay (or some other part of the ship) shielded like the compartment in some versions of the Constellation and Hull C?
 
Not on the stock ship, but this is the kind of upgrade you’d be able to pick up in the PU.
 
9c) Is access to the ship hangar through the cargo bay?
 
At the moment, not directly; I believe you’d need to go up and around.
 
9d) Is there a reason that there is a separate cargo loader, rather than just having the entire cargo bay lower (like in the Constellation)?
 
Purely a stylistic decision.
 
9e) If the loader is needed / kept, can it have cargo held in place or does cargo have to be moved into the bay to be properly secured?
 
You can store cargo on the loader. Think of it like loading in multiple waves – the first one gets pushed back into the hold, the second one stays on the loader.
 
9f) The cargo area plus lift look to be significantly larger than a Constellation Taurus's cargo bay, which does not seem to line up with the listed 1600 unit capacity. How does CIG see the 890's cargo capacity comparing with the Constellation Taurus? With other large ships in general?
 
The 890 should have more cargo space than the Constellation Taurus, but less than a similarly sized cargo ship.
 
10) Given its size do CIG see this fitting in the Revel and York hangar or will it only be accessible from outside?
 
We have a couple of different solutions in mind for larger ships in Hangars, but haven’t settled on a single absolute yet.
 
11) What is the primary method of entering / exiting the 890 Jump when landed? At present the only visible option would be Cargo loader -> Cargo bay -> Elevator -> Level 2.
*UPDATE* - based on concept art in the subscribers den, it looks like there may be an external elevator at the rear.
 
That’s right, rear elevator and cargo loader.
 
source: https://forums.robertsspaceindustri [...] ons#latest

gros post de Ben sur la mécanique des modifications de vaisseaux.
 
https://forums.robertsspaceindustri [...] nt_3685587
 

hey!
 
je poste ici car sur le topic pc c'est le bourdayl    
 
on a des news d'eve valkyrie? ils avaient annoncé 2014 et sur leur site c'est toujours 2014 mais j'ai pas l'impression qu'on le verra pointer le bout de son nez cette année...

 
pourquoi tu postes pas sur le topic de eve online ? tu as plus de chance d'avoir une réponse ^^

Ou sur le topic Oculus Rift vu que OVR finance le jeu.

et qu'il est exclusif Oculus Rift et Sony Morpheus

 
oui c'est vrai en effet, mais bon je me suis dis que les gens d'ici s'interessent aussi sans doutes a ce jeu non.

Sinon je reviens là dessus, mais les gens qui se plaignent que les variantes du Cutlass sont pas à leur goût ...  
Le vaisseau est même pas jouable que ça râle déjà sur les performances/fonctionnalités du bouzin

de mon coté pas du tout car on a tout simplement rien vu, a part une pauvre vidéo

ps : oui divadg ton smiley colle parfaitement avec les gens de la bas

la lettre des 59M$ https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ [...] e-Chairman
et l'image hd qui va avec :