1) En premier lieu, les journalistes ne lui pardonnent pas ses attaques frontales contre le pouvoir médiatique. Ils lui reprochent d’encourager régulièrement son public à huer les médias « malhonnêtes  ». Trump affirme souvent : « Je ne suis pas en compétition avec Hillary Clinton, mais avec les médias corrompus. » Récemment, il a tweeté : « Si les grands médias, répugnants et corrompus, couvraient de manière honnête ma campagne, sans fausses interprétations, je dépasserais Hillary de 20 %. » Il n’a pas hésité à interdire d’accès à ses meetings plusieurs médias importants comme The Washington Post, Politico, Huffington Post et BuzzFeed. Il a même osé attaquer Fox News, la grande chaîne de la droite pamphlétaire, qui pourtant le soutient à fond …

4. Instituer une interdiction de cinq ans aux fonctionnaires de la Maison Blanche et du Congrès de devenir lobbyistes après avoir quitté le gouvernement

5. Créer une interdiction à vie pour les fonctionnaires de la Maison Blanche leur interdisant de faire du lobbying pour le compte d’un gouvernement étranger.

6. Instaurer une interdiction complète pour empêcher les lobbyistes étrangers de fournir des fonds pour les élections américaines.

La Bourse de New York a ouvert en très légère hausse, entraînant dans son sillage les places européennes.
 
La victoire de Donald Trump n’a pas provoqué de panique sur les marchés financiers, même si les places asiatiques, les seules ouvertes au moment de l’annonce des résultats, ont terminé en fort recul. À Tokyo, l’indice Nikkei de la Bourse de Tokyo a chuté de 5,4 %.

Les 7 propositions de Donald Trump que les grands médias nous cachent

../..Le message de Trump diffère de celui des leaders néofascistes européens. Il n’est pas un ultra droitier conventionnel. Il se définit lui même comme un « conservateur avec du bon sens ». Sur l’échiquier politique traditionnel, il se situerait plutôt à la droite de la droite. Chef d’entreprise milliardaire et star populaire de la téléréalité, Trump n’est ni un militant antisystème ni, évidemment, un révolutionnaire. Il ne critique pas le modèle politique en soi, mais plutôt les responsables qui pilotent ce modèle. Son discours est émotionnel et spontané. Il fait appel aux instincts, « aux tripes », pas à la réflexion ni à la raison. Il s’adresse à cette partie de l’électorat américain gagné par le découragement et le mécontentement, et aux gens lassés de la vieille politique et du système des « privilégiés », des « castes ». À tous ceux qui protestent et qui crient : « Qu’ils s’en aillent tous ! » ou « Tous pourris ! », il promet d’injecter de l’honnêteté dans le système et de renouveler le personnel et les mœurs politiques....

....Un tel catalogue de détestables inepties a été diffusé par les médias dominants non seulement aux Etats-Unis mais partout dans le monde. Au point qu’on se demande comment un personnage avec de si misérables idées peut rencontrer un tel succès chez les électeurs américains qui, évidemment, ne sont pas tous décérébrés ? Quelque chose ne cadre pas.

Pour résoudre cette énigme, il a fallu fendre le mur de l’information et analyser de plus près le programme complet du candidat républicain. On découvre alors sept autres options fondamentales qu’il défend, et que les grands médias passent systématiquement sous silence....
http://www.medelu.org/Les-7-propos [...] nald-Trump

Il fait appel aux instincts, « aux tripes », pas à la réflexion ni à la raison. Il s’adresse à cette partie de l’électorat américain gagné par le découragement et le mécontentement, et aux gens lassés de la vieille politique et du système des « privilégiés », des « castes ». À tous ceux qui protestent et qui crient : « Qu’ils s’en aillent tous ! » ou « Tous pourris ! »

Today I want to drive around Moscow with an American flag in the window of my car. If I can find a flag. Join me! :-) They [the Americans] have earned it.

Okay, so today I’m going to drive around like this: in one window I’ll have our flag, and in the other I’ll have an American flag. I’m symbolizing love, peace, and harmony. As an advance.

I just realized that I’ve lost two cases of beer!

Corbyn. Brexit. Trump. Any questions? The world is sick of the establishment, of its lies, and its lying, arrogant media.

When the media and the authorities spend years sowing values that society isn't ready to accept, explaining to society that it's too backward, Trump wins.

People are tired of war. People are tired of the media. People are tired of aggressive liberalism. People are tired of immigrants. Good or bad, these are the facts.

If Trump recognizes our Crimea, cancels the [economic] sanctions, comes to an agreement with us on Syria, and frees Assange, then I'm retiring. Because it will be a beautiful world.

Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin political analyst, was jubilant at the result and said a Trump presidency would make it more likely the US would agree with Russia on Syria, where the two powers back different sides and Moscow has intervened decisively on behalf of the president, Bashar al-Assad.

Markov also said it would mean less American backing for “the terroristic junta in Ukraine”. He denied allegations of Russian interference in the election, but said “maybe we helped a bit with WikiLeaks.”

Serbia has deported a group of Russians suspected of involvement in a coup plot in neighbouring Montenegro, the Guardian has learned, in the latest twist in a murky sequence of events that apparently threatened the lives of two European prime ministers.
 
The plotters were allegedly going to dress in police uniforms to storm the Montenegrin parliament in Podgorica, shoot the prime minister, Milo Ðjukanović, and install a pro-Moscow party.  
 
The Russian fingerprints on the October plot have heightened intrigue about Moscow’s ambitions in a part of Europe hitherto thought to be gravitating towards the EU’s orbit.
 
A group of 20 Serbians and Montenegrins, some of whom had fought with Moscow-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine, were arrested in Podgorica, the Montenegrin capital. In Serbia, meanwhile, several Russian nationals suspected of coordinating the plot were caught with €120,000 and special forces uniforms.

Rumours that Russia may be meddling in the region flared up last month. On October 16th Montenegro’s authorities said that on election day they had halted a Kremlin-backed coup, which aimed to stall the country’s almost completed accession to NATO. Police rounded up a group of 20 Serbian citizens whom Milo Djukanovic, the outgoing prime minister, said were working on behalf of Russia. Bratislav Dikic, the leader of the alleged coup, argued that he was innocent and that evidence had been planted on him. A former head of Serbia’s gendarmerie, a paramilitary police force, Mr Dikic was sacked last year after reports of his involvement in organised crime (accusations which he also denies). Now he leads a small right-wing, pro-Russia, anti-NATO party in Serbia. Many Montenegrins think the story is nonsense and was concocted to encourage doubters to re-elect the government.
 
However on October 24th Aleksandar Vucic, Serbia’s prime minister, announced that another group in his country, including a number of foreigners, had indeed been plotting against Mr Djukanovic. Several people were arrested. Two days later Nikolai Patrushev, a senior Russian security official, flew in, and according to the Serbian press he secured the release of three arrested Russians. (Both the Russian and Serbian authorities denied this.) Four days earlier 40 tonnes of Serbian food, clothes and medicine destined for Aleppo took off in a Russian plane from Nis in central Serbia, where Russia has a base for humanitarian aid. Meanwhile, the Serbian press and officials have been debating the identity of an alleged CIA agent in their police.

In Serbia, Mr Vucic has championed the idea of EU accession, but faces pressure from Russia to co-operate with its Eurasian Economic Union. According to Daniel Sunter, a security analyst in Belgrade, a “war of ideas” is being fought between Russia and the West in Serbia. Russia’s strongest tools are its Serbian-language news outlets, in which, he says, the world is presented as if in a “parallel universe” to that seen by its Western rivals. It is a war which looks likely to escalate.

The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia is a geopoliticalbook by Alexander Dugin. The book has had a large influence within the Russian military, police, and foreign policy elites[1] and was allegedly used as a textbook in the General Staff Academy of Russian military.[1]

Foundations of Geopolitics, by Alexander Dugin

The book declares that "the battle for the world rule of [ethnic] Russians" has not ended and Russia remains "the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution." The Eurasian Empire will be constructed "on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the USA, and the refusal to allow liberal values to dominate us."[1]

Military operations play relatively little role. The textbook believes in a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and disinformation spearheaded by the Russian special services. The operations should be assisted by a tough, hard-headed utilization of Russia's gas, oil, and natural resources to bully and pressure other countries.[1]

The book states that "the maximum task [of the future] is the 'Finlandization' of all of Europe".[1]

In Europe:

Germany should be offered the de facto political dominance over most Protestant and Catholic states located within Central and Eastern Europe. Kaliningrad oblast could be given back to Germany. The book uses the term a "Moscow-Berlin axis".[1]

France should be encouraged to form a "Franco-German bloc" with Germany. Both countries have a "firm anti-Atlanticist tradition".[1]

>United Kingdom should be cut off from Europe.[1]

Finland should be absorbed into Russia. Southern Finland will be combined with the Republic of Karelia and northern Finland will be "donated to Murmansk Oblast".[1]

Estonia should be given to Germany's sphere of influence.[1]

Latvia and Lithuania should be given a "special status" in the Eurasian-Russian sphere.[1]

Poland should be granted a "special status" in the Eurasian sphere.[1]

Romania, Macedonia, "Serbian Bosnia" and Greece – "orthodox collectivist East" – will unite with the "Moscow the Third Rome" and reject the "rational-individualistic West".[1]

>Ukraine should be annexed by Russia because "“Ukraine as a state has no geopolitical meaning, no particular cultural import or universal significance, no geographic uniqueness, no ethnic exclusiveness, its certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics". Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is cordon sanitaire, which would be inadmissible.[1]

In the Middle East and Central Asia:

The book stresses the "continental Russian-Islamic alliance" which lies "at the foundation of anti-Atlanticist strategy". The alliance is based on the "traditional character of Russian and Islamic civilization". Iran is a key ally. The book uses the term "Moscow-Tehran axis".[1]

Armenia has a special role and will serve as a "strategic base" and it is necessary to create "the [subsidiary] axis Moscow-Erevan-Teheran". Armenians "are an Aryan people … [like] the Iranians and the Kurds".[1]

Azerbaijan could be "split up" or given to Iran.[1]

>Georgia should be dismembered. Abkhazia and "United Ossetia" (which includes Georgia's South Ossetia) will be incorporated into Russia. Georgia's independent policies are unacceptable.[1]

Russia needs to create "geopolitical shocks" within Turkey. These can be achieved by employing Kurds, Armenians and other minorities.[1]

The book regards the Caucasus as a Russian territory, including "the eastern and northern shores of the Caspian (the territories of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan)" and Central Asia (mentioning Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kirghistan and Tajikistan).[1]

In Asia:

China, which represents a danger to Russia, "must, to the maximum degree possible, be dismantled". Dugin suggests that Russia start by taking Tibet-Xinjiang-Mongolia-Manchuria as a security belt.[2] Russia should offer China help "in a southern direction – Indochina (except Vietnam), the Philippines, Indonesia, Australia" as geopolitical compensatation.[1]

Russia should manipulate Japanese politics by offering the Kuril Islands to Japan and provoking anti-Americanism.[1]

Mongolia should be absorbed into Eurasia-Russia.[1]

>The book emphasizes that Russia must spread Anti-Americanism everywhere: "the main 'scapegoat' will be precisely the U.S."

In the United States:

>Russia should use its special forces within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism. For instance, **provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics."[1]

The Eurasian Project could be expanded to South and Central America.[1]