Ton resumé de l'etude est assez partiel mais le papier en lui meme est super interessant et riche en données pour ceux que ca interesse.
Je viens d'en lire une partie, et il y a des elements assez marquants:
- ADS-equipped vehicles in work zones have a higher probability of being involved in minor and moderate/severe injury accidents [vs Human driven Vehicles, ADS = systèmes L4 type Google car, sinon ils appellent les systemes classiques L2 ADAS]
- The analysis suggests that accidents of vehicles equipped with Advanced Driving Systems generally have a lower chance of occurring than Human-Driven Vehicles in most of the similar accident scenarios. However, accidents involving Advanced Driving Systems occur more frequently than Human-Driven Vehicle accidents under dawn/dusk or turning conditions, which is 5.25 and 1.98 times higher, respectively. [turning = changements de directions, pas les virages, mais genre je veux tourner a gauche, a droite, ...etc]
mais pour eux ils ont aussi ce genre de stats, assez parlantes:
- When considering the proceeding straight condition, it was found that AV accident resulted in a 0.299 lower probability of an HDV accident. Remarkably, ADS accident risk is 0.021 times as high as that of an HDV accident in run-off road condition, which can be explained by the faster reaction time of AVs (run-off = sorties de route)
- The result [...] revealed a significant correlation between the entering traffic lane condition of ADS accident, the risk of which is [b]0.267 times as high as HDV accident[/b].[...] According to the analysis, the model using accidents of AVs showed a decreased probability of accidents for moderate and fatal severity in comparison to HDV.
- Compared to HDV accidents, AVs experience relatively lower risks in rear-end and broadside accidents (0.457 times and 0.171 times, respectively). This finding indicates that AVs may detect and react to potential rear-end and sideswipe accident situations much faster than humans can.
Message édité par ManuLM le 21-11-2024 à 10:10:52