Reprise du message précédent :
en fait le procédural, c'est très vague, ça dépend de comment et quand il est fait.
 
rien que disposer de la végétation dans le cryengine c'est du procédural.

ok merci,  
c'est vrai que ca peut etre intéréssant d'avoir des plantetes majeures modélisés a la main et un bon paquet en procédural, ca permet d'avoir un nombre plus conséquent de planetes ca peut etre intéréssant!

Mondes principaux à la main, tout les mondes secondaires en procédural doit être une bonne méthode.

la promo du concours episode 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwXdRGxGXVA
 
a 22s je le trouve nickel

Vu vite fait ça m'a l'air un poil au dessus de la première sélection.

le dernier Wingman's hangar (dont la diffusion est passée au mercredi soir maintenant je rappelle) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?featu [...] avfOREH8sA

Il y a plein d'infos intéressantes sur le taf en cours et le planing de dev de SC.
L'on y apprend notamment que le planning n'a pas vraiment bougé et que la beta est toujours prévue pour octobre.

L'on peut aussi y voir l'objet des réunions de la semaine (on peut y voir une réunion dédié au procédural)

A mon sens, le procédural est indispensable dans ce type de jeu. Par contre c'est certainement une méthode de création bourrée de pièges, on va souhaiter garder un certain niveau d'intérêt dans l'exploration, et c'est évidemment là que les soucis vont commencer. J'ai hâte de connaître la façon dont ils vont l'utiliser.

les scans de la dernière fois mais en vraie qualité : https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ [...] es-Gallery
 
la station de minage est vraiment classe.

Traduction du WH (tout ce qui est intéressant a déjà été dit) : http://starcitizen.jeuxonline.info/actualite/43283

2 nouveaux comm links.

L'un est la suite de la nouvelle commencée récemment : Dateline, Sesen 2e partie :
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ [...] N-Part-Two

L'autre est une gallery d'images :

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ [...] es-Gallery

déjà mis en lien  

Vous conseillez quoi comme bon space opera orienté shoot (donc pas à la Eve) ? J'ai deja fait freelancer et les wing commanders... donc plus récent si possible
 
Sinon la dernière image fait un beau fond d'écran même si je préfere la 3eme de la gallerie .

Independance War (I-War) si tu n'y as jamais jouer. Et quitte à n'en faire qu'un je pencherai plutôt pour le 2.
Je viens de regarder, ils sont dispo chez GoG.

La vidéo d'intro qui faisait quasiment 1CD complet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9AN1hpbw2Y

Plus important, le 1er est un xwing-like, le second un privateer-like

 
Les deux freespace si tu ne les as pas fait. Pas vraiment plus récent que Freelancer mais quand même bien bon!

Certes bien moins récent que Freelancer, pourtant à l'heure actuel grâce au SCP les deux sont nettement plus jolie que lui !
Tous les détails et plus encore ici    
http://forum.canardpc.com/threads/ [...] a-2-OUT%29

J'ai glissé sur ma souris chef !
 
J'ai fait un pledge. Avec le Constellation.
Oups.
 
On ne peut pas tirer avec l'arme dans le hangar en fait ?
J'débarque hein.

Sinon en jeux qui m'avait laissé un bon souvenir ya Starlancer (plus ou moins un prequel de Freelancer) et le classique X-Wing Alliance.

 
Avec le panneau de contrôle dans le hangar tu peux enlever une arme du Constellation pour la mettre sur la tourelle.

J'ai réussi avec le panneau à virtuellement monter le canon sur la tourelle, mais il ne se passe rien avec la tourelle "réelle" ...
Comment on valide l'opération qui bouge le canon une fois réalisée sur la tablette ?

Normalement quand tu le fait sur le panneau ça le monte physiquement aussi. Donc t'as juste à t'asseoir sur la tourelle et ça devrait marcher logiquement.

Ben pas là non snifff

Edit : ah oups, c'est bon ... faut fermer la table pour que ça valide  Bon, c'est juste un piou piou basique, le laser sur mon vaisseau.... Hummm ....

un gros post de CR https://forums.robertsspaceindustri [...] nt_1909659
 
a priori il explique pourquoi il n'y a pas forcément assez d'update et de partage du travail.
Perso je trouve que j'en vois suffisamment.
Y a des mecs qui sont jamais content quand même...

Ces derniers temps les update étaient pas super fournies, je pense que c'est pour ça que ça râle... Certains s'attendaient à ce que il y ait au contraire plus de contenu du fait de l'approche du DFM.
 
Mais bon il l'a bien expliqué, c'est pas trop le moment pour faire des "behind the scenes", tout le monde bosse à fond pour sortir le module et ça leur prend vachement de temps ce genre de vidéos.

Je plussoies. J'ai l'impression qu'à un moment on voyait assez souvent des nouveaux concepts de vaisseaux ou autres, des infos sur certains mécanismes du jeux, des update sur le hangar...
Alors que dernièrement, c'est surtout du Lore. Donc oui il y a encore du contenu mais il nous a habitué à plus les mois précédent.
(C'est une impression, je ne suis pas allé faire des stats sur les news pour le confirmer ).

Faudrait fermer le forum RSI, ça grouille de trolls là bas...

perso je look les ask dev tous les jours c'est assez sympa a lire on apprend pas mal de choses coté moteur, mais voilà c'est que du texte et très technique mais moi ça me parle.
 
Comme il le dit peu importe ce qu'il montre pour les fans il ne montrera jamais assez.

 
C'est clair, mais ce forum et cette "abondance" de communication risque de balancer dans le contre-productif. A un moment il va falloir faire comprendre aux donateurs que même tout l'argent du monde ne remplacera pas le temps nécessaire à faire le jeu comme il faut. Peut-être devraient il arrêter d'accepter les dons pour une période plus ou moins longue histoire de calmer les trolls et autres basheurs

arreter de recevoir de l'argent non là je pense pas ^^

bah meme ces derniers temps je trouve que la com' est quand meme super riche sur le jeu, j'ai suivi le dev de beaucoup d'autres jeux et je trouve que la c'est quand meme vachement fourni!

le ten for charmain en text from Reddit :
rien d'extraordinaire

Transcript:
Note: some answers are slightly paraphrased.
Q: What happens when I fly to a Banu world? Will it have space ports I can land at, space stations to doc at, etc.? Will they be alien or do they have the same stores as human worlds?
A: Yes, we definitely will have space ports. We'll have - not the entire Banu area mapped out, although down the road it probably will be - but we'll definitely have Banu worlds you'll visit and can land at. And they'll definitely have space stations. And yes, they will be different in architecture so we're designing that for the Xi'An right now, we're starting on the Banu, you can see the Banu trader is a very different look and feel than the human ships, and we'll be showing you some Xi'An stuff pretty soon. We've got some Xi'An architecture that we've been working on that's very different than human and we quite like it. So, we're trying to make each one of the races have a distinct feel and personality so you feel "I'm in human space, I'm in Banu space, I'm in Xi'An space. That's a long-winded version of "yes".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0GQV_Bx4U#t=247

Q: Are the Class-4 Turrets come as manned and/or only remote controlled?
A: A class 4 turret is a bigger remotely-controlled turret. It is not a manned turret. A class 5 and above are manned turrets. So on a Constellation is two class 5 turrets, on the back of a Freelancer is a class 5 turret. A class 4 turret is essentially a weapon mount that has either a bigger gun or hardpoints for two smaller guns. A good example is the Hornet - the ball turret is a class 4, and also the canard turret is a class 4. A class 2 mount is essentially a very small turret that can only fit one smaller gun. An example of a class 2 is the wing gatlings on the Hornet. A class 1 is a fixed mount for a gun. We have a bigger setting that goes all the way up to class 10 including capital ship mounts and those include spinal weapons as well as much bigger turrets that are for ship-to-ship.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0GQV_Bx4U#t=312

Q: Will I be able to make some credits with a cruise line? Or will the public transportation system make such services obsolete?
A: We're looking for ways that people can run their own businesses in the game. Obviously taking cargo around - someone says "hey, take this piece of cargo or even take this ship from here to here for me because I want it over on this planet" is something to do, and I think that actually we'd like to find a way that people could even transport people around in a way that makes sense. There will be big cruise liners and stuff - there's a public transportation system that we've already promised, but it would be nice to have a version where people could have a ship and take some people from one planet to another. It would be kind of fun to have someone run a cruise liner - it would be a bit "over there" but maybe it could be like Murder on the Orient Express and people could get up to stuff on the cruise liner. We're going to try to have roles for people to do all sorts of jobs and one of them would be transporting people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0GQV_Bx4U#t=395

Q: How can a player who only has 2 or 3 hours a week available to play even hope tyo get a level of enjoyment out of Star Citizen when the competition will be playing 10 to 20 hours a week?
A: That's one of those questions which thinks of Star Citizen as being like "one play path, with one path to win" and the way I'm designing the game and the way I'm thinking about the game is that it isn't like that. There are just different things you can do, so it really depends on what you want to do and what is your definition of "win", because if you think about the real world: lots of people have different definitions of what makes them a winner - is it that they've made lots of money, that they've helped lots of people, is it that they're an amazing athlete, or are they a great teacher. There's all these different definitions and they can all be achieved at different levels: some people achieve things they're happiness or greatness by themselves, some people do it in a group. And I think that's the model of Star Citizen, is that we're allowing things for you to do if you just want to play by yourself and not deal with other people, there will be a game experience that will be very much like the old Privateer/Freelancer experience and you won't feel pressured to be in the big group. If you just want to play with a small group of your friends and go off and do stuff together then you'll be able to do that too. If you want to play in a really big group or organization and try to take over a part of space or build up a big trading empire you'll be able to do that. The goal for us is to provide lots of things to do. And of course with some of these bigger things, there will always be roles for people - like a mining operation, there's someone that wants to own and build a mining operation but then there might be people who just say "hey, I want to be a miner and earn a buck" and work for this coperation to do mining. So, I think that's a better way to think about it: it's not so much about 2 to 3 hours vs. 10 or 20 and you're competing against everyone else because it's what you want to do in the game, and you should be able to have fun with 2 to 3 hours even if someone else is playing 10 to 20 - you'll just be doing different things. You may not be able to do as much stuff but hey, that's the nature of these. But I definitely don't think you'll be not having fun not only playing for 2 or 3 hours.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0GQV_Bx4U#t=466

Q: You still have the complete OoB for the Battle of Austerlitz in "glorious 15mm hand painted miniatures". How many men per figure? How many figures per regiment? ...And did you paint them all yourself?
A: Not really a Star Citizen question but yes [shows miniatures]. The ruleset I was having them built to was Empire 3. It's been so long since I've actually played these - I started putting these together after my ill-gotten gains on the very first Wing Commander which was 24 years ago, and of course when you're actually making games you don't get to do as much game playing as you want. In my old Austin house I had a whole room built up for battle with a whole bunch of GeoHex. Most of this was actually painted in the UK then shipped over to the US, although some of it was painted by me which I quite enjoyed a long time ago though it was also quite painstaking. It sits there and one day I will hopefully play again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0GQV_Bx4U#t=610

Q: Will SQ42 and SC have SMAA (enhanced subpixel morphological antialiasing) in CryEngine?
A: I believe that we support all the AA setups - SMAA, FXMAA - and there's quite a few other ones. And I'm sure we'll support any new stuff that comes out. We've got a pretty big graphics team right now: we have 4 dedicated graphics engineers and we're looking to hire another 2-3. My goal is to have more graphics engineers for SC than even CryTec has. I may not achieve that, but we're going to give it a good try. So the answer is yes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0GQV_Bx4U#t=700

Q: I own an Idris and several Super Hornets. I want to base the Hornets full-time in my Idris. All ships are on the same account, will there be a way to park and leave fighters in the fighter bay of the Idris.
A: The answer is yes. The Idris is designed to have a complement of some ships on it. In SQ42 we decided that it has an active complement of two ships so in the military it has two Hornets and a backup/spare Hornet in case one gets destroyed. That's the standard complement on a military patrol setup. If you have two Hornets you definitely will be able to have them in your Idris. Think of it like: big ships have inventories, and smaller ships have inventories, rooms have inventories, and so you essentially move your Hornet from the inventory in your hangar to the inventory in your Idris. You should be able to have either NPCs to fly it, or preferably - since an Idris is really not designed to be a solo vehicle - you and your friends can have fun. We're really doing some stuff on the bigger/capital ships that I'm super excited by that's really going to push it - it's going to be like a whole game itself running these ships.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0GQV_Bx4U#t=752

Q: When are the Christmas decorations coming down?
A: We've been tardy on that. I believe we're planning to do a hangar update in the next week or so which will be a housecleaning update. One of the things we're doing will be bringing the decorations down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0GQV_Bx4U#t=853

Q: I see that the plan will be to have things added and updated over time, does this include graphics updates as well?
A: Yes, obviously. The long-term plan is that SC will never stop having content added to it, it will never stop having functionality added to it. The way I look at it is - even just now with everyone having the hangar module last year, and the upcoming dogfight module - that's the early versions of adding content and functionality. Our projected path is: we'll do the base dogfight where you'll be able to fly around in single-seater fighters, we'll have another update where we'll bring in the bigger multi-crew ships, then we'll have some update that will involve some first combat stuff, then an update that will bring that all together, then an update that will be planetside, so we're just building the game over time and we won't change that philosophy even after the game is "finished". We'll be adding new functionality and content, and also doing R&D - ultimately long-term I would like to be able to have a way to go seamlessly down onto the planets, maybe have some more procedural generation. That's all stuff that we're doing R&D on now, not for the initial release, but just to get a process to evaluate what the issues are. We're allowed to do this because you guys have been so generous in backing us that we have funds to do some long-term R&D.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y0GQV_Bx4U#t=880

10 4 Chairman #7 : https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ [...] -Episode-7
 
Comm link concernant la nouvelle grille des programmes : https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ [...] t-Schedule

Traduction du Guide Galactique Aegis Dynamics sur JOL

C'est du travail à double avec starcitizen.fr ou bien c'est collaboratif entre les deux plateformes ?

ils ont rien a voir donc j'en doute qu'ils se partagent le taf

 
Comme le dit Kenrio, nous n'avons pas de lien avec SC.FR (meme si je fais partis de leur flotte   ) concernant les traductions.

Traduction du dernier 10 4 C : http://forums.jeuxonline.info/show [...] st26900515

un guide sur Davien :

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ [...] ide-Davien

avec de beaux artworks

Des artworks oué...ils sont beaux oué....sinon niveau DFM ils en sont où ??

 
Ils en sont à un point qui n'a jamais été atteint auparavant.

je viens de lire un truc qui me fait plaisir, a priori les IA des tourelles notamment seront lié au radar (pas que biensur ) mais détruire les radars du vaisseaux diminuera les performances de ces mêmes IA.
On peut imaginer détruire assez facilement un gros vaisseaux style Idris si il n'est composé que d' IA pour la défense.

je copie au cas où j'aurais mal compris :

One of the great steps forward that S42 / SC will be bringing is the detail of modeling when it comes to ship systems damage, which promises to make combat much more tactical and interesting.
Will NPC AI repect this modelling - i.e, will the AI engine be deprived of input if, for instance, the ships radar system is destroyed? Likewise, will the AI properly model detailed visibility / radar limitations so we can hide and ambush, as we will be able to with real players?

Good question - and yes that's the current plan. Currently the AI uses radar to help perceive and then target certain ships. If you destroy a ship's radar the AI would lose the ability to gain information from it. Also if you were to partially damage the radar or use a chaff countermeasure for example, the AI would get broken or incorrect information from the radar. In these scenarios AI may have other means of tracking you, standard view or comms for example, but they would certainly be hindered and you would gain the upper hand. Additionally if you set your loadout to something stealthy the AI radar would reflect this so you can hide and ambush them.