josedsf a écrit :
le conseil c de prendre un 2.6C, avec une mémoire potable de marque style Samsung pc3200, vu que tu n'oc pas
Un 2.4+RAM cas2 tourneras jamais plus vite ku 2.6 cas 2.5 !!!!!!!
|
heureusement que mon josedsf me suit partout et connait mes besoins !
effectivement, je précise que je n'ai pas l'intention d'overclocker...
ma question découle d'un ancien comparo de tweakmax (le site n'existe plus ?) cas 2 vs cas 3
voici les conclusions (j'ai un backup de l'article) :
Final Conclusion:
So what do we learn from these tests? Well, faster isn't always better. For example, in the latest test we can see that 800MHz at Cas-2 is just as fast as running the CPU at 840Mhz, memory at Cas-3! This means that if your 600E maxes out at 834MHz (139x6), but your memory can't run Cas-2 at this speed, you will get better performance if you go down to 800MHz (133x6). Now you will even have a much greater memory bandwidth (MB/sec) than at 840MHz, as shown in Part I of this article, which may give you an even greater advantage at this lower speed, in some applications. So the info in this article might be useful for those people that things having the best possible performance is more important than having a cool bios startup screen showing a lot of MHz ![;) ;)](https://forum-images.hardware.fr/icones/wink.gif)
Message édité par Profil supprimé le 14-06-2003 à 12:05:07