Bonjour à tous, j'ai une rédaction d'anglais à rendre pour demain et jaimerais savoir si j'ai fait des fautes et lesquelles ? merci
 
On one hand, I think Mr Roarks was right to refused Mrs Wilmot's comition. First of all, Mr Roarks was a joung and brillant architect, so it was better for his status of creator to didn't rebuild the same house of Austen Heller, that meaned he didn't have any imagination. Moreover, Mrs Wilmot was very arrogant and she had no taste, so Mr Roarks would have had difficulties to work in such conditions and did something what Mrs Wilmot's would have like.
 
On the other hand, I think Mr Roarks wasn't right to refused Mrs Wilmot's comition. In fact, Mr Roaks was young and he had to earn a good living, so he could build the house and be paid. Build one more house would have extend his work and permite to meet others clients.

Je suis en freestyle sur la concordance des temps O_o
 
On one hand, I think Mr Roarks was right to refuse Wilmot's commission. First of all, Mr Roarks was a young and brillant architect, so it was better for his reputation as a creator to not rebuild the samehouse as Austen Heller's, which would have meant that he didn't have any imagination. Moreover, Mrs Wilmot was very arrogant and she had no taste, so MrRoarks would have had difficulty working in such conditions, doing what Mrs Wilmot's would have liked.
 
On the other hand, I think Mr Roarks wasn't right to refuse Mrs Wilmot's commission. In fact, Mr Roaks was young and he had to earn a good living; he could have built the house and been paid. Building one more house would have extended his work (voc?) and allowed him to meet other clients.
 
(note 1: non rien je dis du caca)