Comments posted by csaag, December 01, 2004. Rated this writer 9 of 10
Comments posted by Pablo, July 27, 2004. Rated this writer 9 of 10.
Comments posted by chris, July 16, 2004. Rated this writer 7 of 10.
Comments posted by Nick Turner, July 13, 2004. Rated this writer 1 of 10.
Comments posted by Myfurf, July 03, 2004. Rated this writer 7 of 10.
Comments posted by Bob Fahey, June 04, 2004. Rated this writer 8 of 10
Comments posted by Ashen, May 05, 2004. Rated this writer 8 of 10.
Comments posted by glockjs, May 03, 2004. Rated this writer 10 of 10.
Comments posted by glockjs, March 09, 2004. Rated this writer No rating.
Comments posted by PAUL, March 04, 2004. Rated this writer 9 of 10
Comments posted by Jsaint, February 28, 2004. Rated this writer 10 of 10.
Comments posted by James Ryan, February 20, 2004. Rated this writer 8 of 10
Comments posted by Brian, February 15, 2004. Rated this writer 8 of 10.
Comments posted by bozo, February 15, 2004. Rated this writer 1 of 10.
Comments posted by glockjs, February 11, 2004. Rated this writer 8 of 10.
Comments posted by TheAngryPenguin, February 10, 2004. Rated this writer 1 of 10.
Comments posted by ob, February 08, 2004. Rated this writer No rating.
Comments posted by EZ, February 06, 2004. Rated this writer 3 of 10.
Comments posted by bleedat, February 05, 2004. Rated this writer No rating
Comments posted by perfman, January 25, 2004. Rated this writer 7 of 10.
Comments posted by tg, January 25, 2004. Rated this writer No rating.
Comments posted by legend, January 23, 2004. Rated this writer 9 of 10.
Comments posted by reh, January 23, 2004. Rated this writer 9 of 10
Comments posted by stuart, January 22, 2004. Rated this writer 8 of 10.
Comments posted by J-Dub, January 13, 2004. Rated this writer 10 of 10.
25 commentaires : 4 mauvais , 17 bons, 4 non noté
C'est plutot correct comme rating je vois pas ce qu'il te faut.
Je vais pas le brader, il marche très bien.
Message édité par redrat le 02-02-2005 à 19:17:45